- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New study proves ivermectin works
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:12 am to BamaAtl
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:12 am to BamaAtl
quote:
and that one study has 2 lead authors funded by one of the companies that would profit from their contradictory view....that's a red flag.
It’s certainly a cause to look at the study more closely. I don’t discount that. Would you say a Pfizer study that has a doctor on it who ever got paid by Pfizer is questionable?
Changing study design midstream is bad. That’s more important than “one time Vitamedica paid this doctor.”
2
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:13 am to GhostOfFreedom
quote:
Imagine if the government had just sent every American a months worth of Ivermectin. It might have cost 5 million bucks and COVID (China Virus) might have been done in 2020.
How the frick do you think they can make 50,000,000 in kickbacks on revenue of 5,000,000. It doesn't work that way.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:14 am to BamaAtl
Hes not wrong moron.
He's simply pointing out that old financial connections would literally disqualify ALL scientists, Fauci being at the front of the line, from ever publishing.
You are asserting that there is some financial interest in promoting a 40 year old generic that is cheap, widely manufactured, and already being used all over the world to treat covid19, while ignoring that fricking billions are being raked in on new patented covid treatments by a small cabal of big pharma firms, AND the fact that they've already been busted publishing fake papers about drugs like Ivermectin and HCQ.
You cant have it both ways.
He's simply pointing out that old financial connections would literally disqualify ALL scientists, Fauci being at the front of the line, from ever publishing.
You are asserting that there is some financial interest in promoting a 40 year old generic that is cheap, widely manufactured, and already being used all over the world to treat covid19, while ignoring that fricking billions are being raked in on new patented covid treatments by a small cabal of big pharma firms, AND the fact that they've already been busted publishing fake papers about drugs like Ivermectin and HCQ.
You cant have it both ways.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:15 am to omegaman66
quote:
It might have cost 5 million bucks
It would have cost a lot more than that.
But trillions less than we spent.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:15 am to BamaAtl
quote:
When you have dozens of studies saying it doesn't work
Then what are you worried about? If it doesn't work stop fighting so hard against it. When prescribed it is a harmless drug. At worse the people that are taking it will be out $5 and fully dewormed.
It's a harmless drug. Stop treating it like it's fentanyl.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:15 am to smh4wg
So now we all have to take Ivermectin for the rest of our lives as a prophylactic to protect us if we should happen to get Covid? That's what they did to this town in Brazil.
Now we have Ivermectin cultists who want to force Ivermectin daily doses on everyone in the world?
Why would anyone trade a two shot vaccine for having to take a daily dose of Ivermectin for the rest of their lives?
Now we have Ivermectin cultists who want to force Ivermectin daily doses on everyone in the world?
Why would anyone trade a two shot vaccine for having to take a daily dose of Ivermectin for the rest of their lives?
This post was edited on 1/25/22 at 10:21 am
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:17 am to TBoy
quote:
So now we all have to take Ivermectin for the rest of our lives
who said that?
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:17 am to the808bass
quote:
Would you say a Pfizer study that has a doctor on it who ever got paid by Pfizer is questionable?
If there are dozens of articles that say the Pfizer drug they're studying doesn't work, an they are the only ones who publish that it does? And with obviously massaged data? Obviously.
The funding alone isn't enough to discredit this study - but combined with all of the other errors, it provides an answer to why they'd choose to be so shoddy.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:17 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
You are asserting that there is some financial interest in promoting a 40 year old generic that is cheap
To be fair, Ivermectin is how a generic company would exploit the current scene. They’re not bringing new therapies to market.
And Vitamedica sold +$80M in Ivermectin last year. Is that pennies compared to the big boys? Sure. Could it still be profit taking? Sure.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:17 am to TBoy
You’re a liar and an idiot.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:17 am to BamaAtl
quote:
If there are dozens of articles that say the Pfizer drug they're studying doesn't work, an they are the only ones who publish that it does? And with obviously massaged data? Obviously.
So, like the Pfizer vaccine.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:18 am to Gifman
quote:
who said that?
This study administered Ivermectin to every person in a town in Brazil as a prophylactic, whether they had Covid or not. So this study's suggestion is that everyone take Ivermectin all the time.
This post was edited on 1/25/22 at 10:19 am
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:18 am to GumboPot
quote:
Then what are you worried about?
Malicious actors convincing gullible people to do things that might harm them and their families.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:18 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
You’re a liar and an idiot.
Read TFA and report the methodology honestly. I will hang up and wait.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:19 am to the808bass
The Feds have managed to approve quite a few completely new, patented medications to treat covid.... Several vaccines, both for adults and children, boosters, anti-virals, and so on. All of this in a few months.
But two years in, they still cant figure out if a 40 year old drug, with hundreds of international studies and real world data behind it, is suitable?
These are the scientists our friends on the left march in step with.
But two years in, they still cant figure out if a 40 year old drug, with hundreds of international studies and real world data behind it, is suitable?
These are the scientists our friends on the left march in step with.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:19 am to the808bass
Low TBoy and BamaAtl how fricking embarrassing for them both
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:20 am to BamaAtl
quote:
Malicious actors convincing gullible people to do things that might harm them and their families.
/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/pmn/PTE7NTEHQ5BFBAUNFQOIJSMMP4.jpg)
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:20 am to TBoy
quote:
So this study's suggestion
Your interpretation
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:21 am to BamaAtl
quote:
Almost none of the others are this glaringly bad
So I take you support Remdisivir.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:21 am to TBoy
quote:
Why would anyone trade a two shot vaccine for having to take a daily dose of Ivermectin for the rest of their lives?
One has a side effect profile of nil. And it’s not the rest of your life, Nancy. It’s until the scam is complete.
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News