- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:22 am to TBoy
quote:
So this study's suggestion is that everyone take Ivermectin all the time.
Is it? You might be retarded.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:22 am to TBoy
quote:
So now we all have to take Ivermectin for the rest of our lives as a trophallactic to protect us if we should happen to get Covid?
No.
quote:
Now we have Ivermectin cultists who want to force Ivermectin daily doses on everyone in the world?
Where are they forcing ivermectin?
quote:
Why would anyone trade a two shot vaccine for having to take a daily dose of Ivermectin for the rest of their lives?
At least you are providing a choice. And you don't have to take Ivermectin the rest of your life. Take it upon an outbreaks. Then you are likely to contract the virus, be asymptomatic to mild symptoms and develop natural immunity which is the goal.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:22 am to the808bass
I'm asserting who is more likely to publish a fake study or take liberty with data.
The firm that stands to make an extra 5 million next year, or the firm that makes 5 BILLION on each order?
The firm that stands to make an extra 5 million next year, or the firm that makes 5 BILLION on each order?
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:23 am to the808bass
quote:
One has a side effect profile of nil. And it’s not the rest of your life, Nancy. It’s until the scam is complete.
OK. When will Covid be "over?" How long must everyone take a continuous maintenance dose of Ivermectin to reach the protection suggested in the article. Should everyone be taking it now?
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:24 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
The firm that stands to make an extra 5 million next year, or the firm that makes 5 BILLION on each order?
Both?
Fraud happens at all levels.
I don’t like the study design changing and I don’t like the fact that so few of the treatment group completed their treatment.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:25 am to TBoy
quote:
When will Covid be "over?"
Herd immunity.
Everyone (or a sufficient amount of people)need to catch it regardless of vaxx status.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:25 am to TBoy
quote:
Should everyone be taking it now?
No. If you choose to try to get the extra protection from the infection that you think the treatment might offer, you should take it.
Now, if it took 30,000 people taking Ivermectin to prevent one Covid death, it would be as effective as the vaccine.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:26 am to TigerStripes30
quote:
so when do we overthrow the government because they are obviously not representing the greater good of the people
I want public hangings of the mass murderers.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:27 am to TBoy
quote:
OK. When will Covid be "over?" How long must everyone take a continuous maintenance dose of Ivermectin to reach the protection suggested in the article. Should everyone be taking it now?
Why are you pretending that taking prolonged Ivermectin, which has zero side effects, is insane, but injecting gene therapy into perpetuity is good science?
This is why no one takes you seriously.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:27 am to deathvalleytiger10
quote:
So I take you support Remdisivir.
Remdesivir has limited uses - it's not a cure-all.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:28 am to GumboPot
The methodology is the following:
So the comparison is that more than 100,000 people were given maintenance doses of Ivermectin. Then they compared Covid outcomes between the 100,000 people who received constant maintenance doses and those who refused to take it.
This "it works" applies to people who receive Ivermectin as a prophylactic in a constant dosage. This is being touted as something great in this thread. But the only way to replicate this "success" is by taking this stuff all the time.
quote:
The entire population of Itajaí was invited to participate in the program, which involved a medical visit to compile baseline, personal, demographic, and medical information. In the absence of contraindications, ivermectin was offered as a preventative treatment, to be taken for two consecutive days every 15 days at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg/day.
Of the 223,128 citizens of Itajaí considered for the study, a total of 159,561 subjects elected to participate: over 70% opted to take ivermectin, and 23% chose not to.
So the comparison is that more than 100,000 people were given maintenance doses of Ivermectin. Then they compared Covid outcomes between the 100,000 people who received constant maintenance doses and those who refused to take it.
This "it works" applies to people who receive Ivermectin as a prophylactic in a constant dosage. This is being touted as something great in this thread. But the only way to replicate this "success" is by taking this stuff all the time.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:29 am to CasualBystander
quote:
FLCCC is the Frontline Doctors, a group that has spread some ridiculous ideas. The study is published in Cureus, a journal that uses crowd-sourcing as peer review. When it is published in NEJM, Nature, or Lancet, run with it. Until then, file it away as interesting but not definitive. Let the downvotes begin...
Their regimen has prevented us from getting Covid when everyone around us has it. Also saved my momma’s life in July 2020, you murderous lunatic.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:29 am to TBoy
quote:
So now we all have to take Ivermectin for the rest of our lives as a prophylactic to protect us if we should happen to get Covid? That's what they did to this town in Brazil.
Now we have Ivermectin cultists who want to force Ivermectin daily doses on everyone in the world?
Why would anyone trade a two shot vaccine for having to take a daily dose of Ivermectin for the rest of their lives?
Holy shite at the stupidity in this post.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:29 am to BamaAtl
Remdesivir has no statistically significant effect on mortality.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:30 am to TBoy
quote:
This "it works" applies to people who receive mRNA vaccines as a prophylactic in a constant dosage. This is being touted as something great in this thread. But the only way to replicate this "success" is by taking this stuff all the time
FIFY
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:30 am to TBoy
quote:
So now we all have to take Ivermectin for the rest of our lives as a prophylactic to protect us if we should happen to get Covid? That's what they did to this town in Brazil.
As opposed to a social experiment injection every few months?
Fckg idiot
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:31 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
No one has a financial interest in falsely promoting the efficacy of this drug. Its the exact opposite.
This right here. Hit the nail on the head.
It is so aggravating when stupid morons come here spouting off crap saying that a company is going to fake / manipulate a study to promote a drug that cost a nickel a dose instead of their drug that the sale for 10,000x more per dose.
Allegation made on nothing when we on the other hand expose them doing studies to disparage ivermectin and hcq by doing studies where the subjects are not given treatment until the last days of infection (ivermectin) or given poisonous amounts of the drug to kill the patient and 'prove' the drug doesn't work (hcq).
And they have been doing this long before covid19 ever happened.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:32 am to TBoy
For a harmless drug that doesn't work you guys are really triggered by it.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 10:34 am to TBoy
quote:
This "it works" applies to people who receive Ivermectin as a prophylactic in a constant dosage. This is being touted as something great in this thread. But the only way to replicate this "success" is by taking this stuff all the time.
Says the one who can’t wait to get in line for another dangerous injection when there is an alternative with a record of safety for decades.
This post was edited on 1/25/22 at 11:02 am
Popular
Back to top


0





