- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NY Times: Jesus was likely a Palestinian
Posted on 4/23/19 at 5:14 am to tiggerthetooth
Posted on 4/23/19 at 5:14 am to tiggerthetooth
0
Posted on 4/23/19 at 5:41 am to tiggerthetooth
quote:
NY Times
is likely a POS.....OK remove likely
Posted on 4/23/19 at 7:18 am to tiggerthetooth
Rational people know that Jesus was likely in the dusky range - anywhere from a medium khaki to a dark tan.
But, the entire foundation upon which he built his ministry was Judaism.
The term Palestinian hadn't been invented yet. FFS we were over 600 years before Islam at that point.
But, the entire foundation upon which he built his ministry was Judaism.
The term Palestinian hadn't been invented yet. FFS we were over 600 years before Islam at that point.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 7:46 am to tiggerthetooth
Christ is of the Tribe of Judah.
Idk wtf this guy got his information, but this guy is a moron.
Idk wtf this guy got his information, but this guy is a moron.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 7:52 am to tiggerthetooth
quote:
NY Times: Jesus was likely a Palestinian
Everything in the Old Testament prophecies speaking of the messiah and all of the New Testament verses speaking of Jesus as that messiah is directly tied to the Jews. Coming to any other conclusion is unhistoric and unbiblical nonsense.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 7:55 am to tiggerthetooth
quote:Nice supporting evidence.
Palestinians are Arabs, Arabs did not exist in the area that would become Palestine until 700 years after Jesus died.
The people now described as “Arabs” are not closely-related to one another and are comprised of four distinct genetic groups.
(1) The North Africans (Algerians, Tunisians, Moroccans, and Libyans), and the first Arabian Peninsula cluster (Saudis, Kuwaitis, and Yemenis),
(2) The Levantine Arabs (Palestinians, Jordanians, Lebanese, and Syrians), along with Iraqi and Egyptians, who are related to Eastern Mediterraneans.
(3) The Sudanese and Comorians, who tend to cluster with Sub-Saharans.
(4) The second Arabian Peninsula cluster, made up of Omanis, Emiratis, and Bahrainis.
In very simple terms, MANY of the peoples who were conquered by the Arabian expansion (fueled by the spread of Islam) started calling themselves “Arabs” as they adopted much of the Arabian culture.
quote:In layman’s terms, the people of the ancient Levant (ancestors to both the Jews and the modern Palestinians) were all closely-related to one another, and NOT to the people of the Arabian peninsula. About 3000 years ago, there was a CULTURAL (religious) split, between inter alia the Jewish and Palestinians ancestors.
Palestinians (the above-described Levantine Arabs) are genetically yery close to Jewsand other Middle East populations, including Turks (Anatolians), Lebanese, Egyptians, Armenians, and Iranians. Archaeologic and genetic data support that both Jews and Palestinians came from the ancient Canaanites, who extensively mixed with Egyptians, Mesopotamian, and Anatolian peoples in ancient times. Thus, Palestinian-Jewish rivalry is based in cultural and religious, but not in genetic, differences. The relatively close relatedness of both Jews and Palestinians to western Mediterranean populations reflects the continuous circum-Mediterranean cultural and gene flow that have occurred in prehistoric and historic times.
Thereafter, the Jewish diaspora took place, THEN the Levant was conquered by Arabians. The Palestinians ancestors adopted the CULTURE of their conquerors and perhaps even started CALLING themselves “Arabs,” just as the Greeks CALLED themselves Romans for 1500 years after THEIR conquest by Rome.
This post was edited on 4/23/19 at 8:10 am
Posted on 4/23/19 at 8:56 am to tiggerthetooth
He was Jewish and was definitely Middle Eastern....this is not a revelation
Posted on 4/23/19 at 9:27 am to tiggerthetooth
Can't wait til the brave New York Times does a huge series of articles on the fact that mohammed was one of the biggest slave owners in History.....
BTW, where's that damned "crickets" emoji?
BTW, where's that damned "crickets" emoji?
Posted on 4/23/19 at 9:31 am to papasmurf1269
quote:
I already knew that he was not a white man considering the region he was from
I always thought Jesus looked like Brad Pitt with long hair and a beard.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 9:34 am to GumboPot
According to scientists, more like this.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 9:36 am to Plx1776
quote:
How dumb are Palestinians?
They are extremely low IQ people due to Inbreeding.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 9:36 am to tiggerthetooth
Well, Nazareth is the “Arab capital of Israel”
Posted on 4/23/19 at 9:37 am to mrbroker
He was an olive skinned Jew. Of course he was from Middle East. The fact they ignore land of Canaan or the states of judea and Israel and have to use modern day Palestine oh because he was born in Bethlehem is laughable. Pure left wing tripe.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 9:40 am to Revelator
I found this kind of interesting.
quote:
Another rare early portrait of Jesus was discovered in 2018 on the walls of a ruined church in southern Israel. Painted in the sixth century A.D., it is the earliest known image of Christ found in Israel, and portrays him with shorter, curly hair, a depiction that was common to the eastern region of the Byzantine empire?especially in Egypt and the Syria-Palestine region?but disappeared from later Byzantine art.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 9:40 am to Revelator
That is very likely what he looked like. He wasn't 'white' and wasn't 'black'. He was somewhere in between and likely had an olive or dark olive complexion. We know from descriptions in The Bible he was not handsome and he certainly didn't look like the 'California surfer' Jesus we see depicted in Europe and other places where he has long straight brown or blondish hair with blue eyes. That is pure fantasy.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 9:42 am to GumboPot
quote:
it is the earliest known image of Christ found in Israel, and portrays him with shorter, curly hair, a depiction that was common to the eastern region of the Byzantine empire?especially in Egypt and the Syria-Palestine region?but disappeared from later Byzantine art.
So, when and why did he become a long-haired hippie?
Posted on 4/23/19 at 9:44 am to 337Tiger19
quote:
Well, Nazareth is the “Arab capital of Israel”
Well, it wasnt when Jesus was alive.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 9:45 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
So, when and why did he become a long-haired hippie?
According to this article:
quote:
The long-haired, bearded image of Jesus that emerged beginning in the fourth century A.D. was influenced heavily by representations of Greek and Roman gods, particularly the all-powerful Greek god Zeus. At that point, Jesus started to appear in a long robe, seated on a throne (such as in the fifth-century mosaic on the altar of the Santa Pudenziana church in Rome), sometimes with a halo surrounding his head.
“The point of these images was never to show Jesus as a man, but to make theological points about who Jesus was as Christ (King, Judge) and divine Son,” Joan Taylor, professor of Christian origins and second temple Judaism at King's College London, wrote in The Irish Times. “They have evolved over time to the standard ‘Jesus’ we recognize.”
LINK
Posted on 4/23/19 at 9:46 am to Y.A. Tittle
That was only after he smoked some hashish with Some romans.
Posted on 4/23/19 at 9:56 am to tiggerthetooth
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News