- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/29/25 at 8:47 am to antibarner
quote:
Richard Nixon was pardoned by Gerald Ford for what reason if he was immune from prosecution?
The immunity decision was in 2024. When was Nixon pardoned?
Posted on 7/29/25 at 8:49 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Sure, but we aren't really talking about that, are we?
I mean, people who want him to not be immune keep trying to change the facts and the discussion, accordingly, yes.
quote:
We are talking about ordering his political lackeys to direct the intelligence community to lie about a political rival in order to, at minimum, derail the government
You've really framed the facts, but assuming this is all true, why wouldn't he be immune?
Remember the "Seal Team 6" hypos from the arguments about the immunity case? We're somewhat seeing one of those unfold in real time
Posted on 7/29/25 at 8:49 am to RoyalWe
quote:
but seems silly to get protection from purposeful political illegal acts just because you're in office.
Immunity from collateral damage of authorizing military strikes? Sure.
Telling the FBI/CIA what story you want them to tell even though it's against the actual intelligence? Nah.
Anyone care to bump the threads about the immunity case from last year?
Posted on 7/29/25 at 8:50 am to SlowFlowPro
It wouldn't have mattered anyway. Biden showed us that you can blanket-pardon "completely innocent people", so it would be racist to assume Nixon is a criminal just because he accepted Ford's pardon.
This post was edited on 7/29/25 at 8:52 am
Posted on 7/29/25 at 8:51 am to BigTigerJoe
quote:
What happens if he continued with activities related to the original conspiracy after he left office?
Then he wouldn't be immune, which is why you see hopium-infused theories trying to stretch what "conspiracy" is to both extend the SOL and remove immunity.
That's why you get talking point-based discussions trying to create that scenario.
Posted on 7/29/25 at 8:51 am to ScoopAndScore
quote:
I can still remember exactly where I was when Trump came out and said “Obama tapped my wires”.
Thanks to Admiral Rodgers for that.
PS - Funny how SFPanican has never addressed the fact that Obama spied on Trump. Wonder why?
Posted on 7/29/25 at 8:52 am to SlowFlowPro
If the facts say charge Obama it should happen IMO. Both for cause and to get a reading from the SCOTUS on the limits of the prior ruling on Presidential Immunity….
Posted on 7/29/25 at 8:54 am to Zgeo
right. regardless of SFPs verbal diarrhea, they can just do what democrats have repeatedly done.... twist the law to their will and make it happen.
But they wont do it. I can almost guarantee that Trump wont go there because he'd be inviting the same thing onto himself post-presidency. And you KNOW the dems wont be bashful about exacting revenge.
But they wont do it. I can almost guarantee that Trump wont go there because he'd be inviting the same thing onto himself post-presidency. And you KNOW the dems wont be bashful about exacting revenge.
Posted on 7/29/25 at 8:56 am to KCT
quote:
Funny how SFPanican has never addressed the fact that Obama spied on Trump
Why do you lie so much?
Posted on 7/29/25 at 8:57 am to Zgeo
quote:
If the facts say charge Obama
From what we have now, they don't, even ignoring the immunity/SOL issues.
quote:
Both for cause and to get a reading from the SCOTUS on the limits of the prior ruling on Presidential Immunity
The ruling last year already established this.
Posted on 7/29/25 at 8:57 am to SlowFlowPro
Wires were NOT ackshywully tapped!!!! 
Posted on 7/29/25 at 8:57 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Wires were NOT ackshywully tapped!!!!
I never made that argument. I always called out muh Russia/Russian collusion as fake news.
Posted on 7/29/25 at 9:02 am to SlowFlowPro
Save it SFP, just go with the alternative reality they have created. Be a bro!!!
Posted on 7/29/25 at 9:03 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Russian interference/hacking is real
What is your source for this?
Posted on 7/29/25 at 9:05 am to BurlesonCountyAg
quote:
What is your source for this?
The literal memo Tulsi released last week
If you want to claim that's wrong, then the analysis on the purported improprieties of the Obama admin should be discarded too, as they're from the same source.
Posted on 7/29/25 at 9:07 am to SlowFlowPro
I must have missed the hacking part
Posted on 7/29/25 at 9:08 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Then he wouldn't be immune, which is why you see hopium-infused theories trying to stretch what "conspiracy" is to both extend the SOL and remove immunity.
Would be nice to see one of his conspirators flip on him and say he continued to conspire once he left office. Destroying his legacy is just as good as any conviction.
He would get pardoned for the good of the Nation; just like Nixon.
Posted on 7/29/25 at 9:10 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Why do you lie so much?
SFPanican
Were you looking in the mirror when you said this? You're the biggest liar here. You claim to be just the opposite of who and what you really are.
Posted on 7/29/25 at 9:11 am to BigTigerJoe
Susan Rice wrote the “ we did everything by the book” memo. Tends to imply that she knew she needed to CHA for what they did. She might flip on Obama….
Popular
Back to top


1





