I'm not sure but I doubt we're talking tens of thousands. Perhaps we could be talking in the thousands.

I think we are just talking about clear cases where agencies were under the direction of a Presidential administration to formulate a "regulation" (or other directive) that was clearly not an interpretation of an existing law, but rather a whole new law itself that the then Administration knew it could never get through Congress. The EPA is probably the "current" best case for this as Congress has REFUSED to pass the Green New Deal insanity so Odumbf*ck used the EPA to get around Congress.

The major victory will be to discourage future government overreach as the West Virginia case could make it easier to get an injunction and the burden would then be on the alphabet agency to show that it's interpreting law rather than creating law. Further, West Virginia could be decided in a way so that Congress would be prevented from delegating the making of laws to these alphabet agencies.

It will all depend on the holding and, almost as importantly, how the holding is written.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Jake88

Member since Apr 2005

78997 posts

Posted on 6/29/22 at 8:14 am to MMauler

Wouldn't this impact the rules on how much water your dishwasher can use, the MPG of a manufacturer's car fleet, the types of bumpers on cars, what public schools need to teach to get federal funding and other picayune matters? That's where I came up with "tens of thousands", rules are everywhere.

This post was edited on 6/29/22 at 8:15 am

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Zephyrius

Wharton, La.

Member since Dec 2004

9482 posts

Posted on 6/29/22 at 8:35 am to Jake88

quote:
If Chief Justice Milquetoast

My concern also-

Roberts was able to bend the Obama mandate into a tax which Congress has power and so it goes elections have consequences.

If Roberts is writing the opinion siding with the EPA he will most assuredly attempt to bend these regulations that the President along with his cabinet(agencies)has this power hence (fraudulent)elections have consequences.

Hope I'm wrong but this is what I'm expecting.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by MMauler

Primary This RINO Traitor

Member since Jun 2013

24176 posts

Posted on 6/29/22 at 8:39 am to Jake88

quote:
Wouldn't this impact the rules on how much water your dishwasher can use, the MPG of a manufacturer's car fleet, the types of bumpers on cars, what public schools need to teach to get federal funding and other picayune matters?

It could possibly. It would depend on how the underlying law was written.

In my mind, I think one thing they may look at are regulations that change every time a different political party take over the White House. In the West Virginia case, the Odumbf*ck administration used the EPA to implement something that clearly wasn't just a regulation but laws that were nothing short of an end-around Congress. The Trump administration nixed those rules. Then, as soon as Raping Joe got in office, he reinstituted those "rules". Clearly, these "rules" are political and having these "rules" change every time a different political party takes over the White House shows that this is just Unconstitutional politicized "rule making".

In short, the rules and laws that we all have to follow should not be dependent upon who is in the White House.

This post was edited on 6/29/22 at 8:41 am

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by MakeLSUgoodAgain

Member since Sep 2021

132 posts

Posted on 6/29/22 at 10:02 am to VoxDawg

“Draconian” is the left’s synonym for constitutionality.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by JColtF

Lake Charles, LA