- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: People who hate Trump will believe anything
Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
Lawfare is the strategic use or misuse of legal systems and lawsuits to intimidate, burden, coerce, punish or weaken an opponent rather than to seek justice.
1
Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:09 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
I'm not saying it is or isn't, but how do you know it's a lie?
A liberal said it
Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't even know what "lawfare" is
Ouch
Posted on 12/21/25 at 2:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Define it for me and I can assess.
Who the frick are you and why should anybody waste time with your fake obtuseness?
Posted on 12/21/25 at 3:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Lord do I feel that meme.
You should.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 3:29 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
SFP trying to rewrite history on trans and child sex trafficking rings is rich.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 3:35 pm to thebigmuffaletta
Trump has destroyed their entire party.
And it’s glorious
And it’s glorious
Posted on 12/21/25 at 3:37 pm to The Torch
quote:
Trump has destroyed their entire party. And it’s glorious
I wish this were true
Posted on 12/21/25 at 3:45 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
Lawfare is the strategic use or misuse of legal systems and lawsuits to intimidate, burden, coerce, punish or weaken an opponent rather than to seek justice.
So to test your definition
The Florida prosecution of Trump and defamation suit against Rudy are NOT examples of lawfare, correct?
And the various post-election lawsuits that had no factual basis filed on behalf of Trump WERE lawfare, correct?
Posted on 12/21/25 at 3:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
There it is slowparsingpro can pick the nit.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 3:57 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
You are always punching at the air.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 4:07 pm to thebigmuffaletta
It beyond funny at this point
Posted on 12/21/25 at 4:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
So rather than just be intellectually SECURE and acknowledge the existence of the concept, you choose to immediately obfuscate, deflect and project? Thats not a very impressive response, my guy. Do you want to try again?
Posted on 12/21/25 at 4:13 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
You want us to believe that the judicial branch is something impervious to human nature and corruption and using their power to coerce and target and destroy people
SFP believes that local law enforcement and prosecutors are all in on a mass conspiracy to deny people their constitutional rights but can’t fathom that this can be the case at the federal level.
According to him, the local beat cop is corrupt but democrat federal judges and prosecutors can never be corrupt.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:23 am to TX Tiger
quote:
quote:
Was reading the comments on a news article and one liberal after another was insisting that Trump had thanksgiving dinner with Epstein in 2017.
I'm not saying it is or isn't, but how do you know it's a lie?
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:25 am to Lsupimp
quote:
So rather than just be intellectually SECURE and acknowledge the existence of the concept, you choose to immediately obfuscate, deflect and project? T
No. Not at all. I tested your definition.
The typical scenario is this:
People cite one of the malleable, vague MAGA words
I ask for a definition
They give one
I test it
They rage quit, typically shielded in ad homs
quote:
you choose to immediately obfuscate, deflect and project? Thats not a very impressive response, my guy. Do you want to try again?
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:26 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Literally not being able to see a thread without going “ah yes, this reminds me of what the right does” has to mean something bro
You simply have to be much farther left than you claim
He admitted on here a while back that he supported and voted for Obama. So, he is definitely much farther left than he claims.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:26 am to The Torch
quote:
Posted on 12/21/25 at 3:35 pm to thebigmuffaletta
Trump has destroyed their entire party.
Trumps war is with Republicans, not Democrats.
He's the literal RINO
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:26 am to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
SFP believes that local law enforcement and prosecutors are all in on a mass conspiracy to deny people their constitutional rights
A very inaccurate and emotive way to strawman my stance.
quote:
but can’t fathom that this can be the case at the federal level.
Topped with utter retardation.
I have never dismissed the feds from expanding police power over citizens and fighting to restrict our rights in court. What a dumb thing to say.
You are not living in reality my friend.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:27 am to AlterEd
quote:
Correct. He's another of these leftists pretending to be a libertarian. Most of the so-called libertarians around here are exactly the same.
Liberaltarians
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News