- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Question for Trump Supporters reg. NYT piece.
Posted on 9/5/18 at 11:53 pm to Wild Thang
Posted on 9/5/18 at 11:53 pm to Wild Thang
These "concerns" about Trump's stability would hold more credence if they weren't a Dem talking point going back to September 2016.
0
Posted on 9/6/18 at 12:01 am to NewYorkYankeeFan
Not concerned with Trump as we now have a year and a half plus of his policy and rhetoric and not only has this country not been destroyed and rights not been trampled but it can be argued that we are much better off now than we were when he took office.
I’m more concerned with the admission of sedition within the administration and want the perpetrators to receive justice.
I’m more concerned with the admission of sedition within the administration and want the perpetrators to receive justice.
Posted on 9/6/18 at 12:08 am to NewYorkYankeeFan
If it I was written by someone within the admin, it was probably someone like Amarosa with an ax to grind. I believe it was a fabrication, sounds too much like the BS Joe and Mika have been spewing for awhile, maybe they wrote it. I am amazed at President Trump, under constant attack but still doing a great job MAGA
Posted on 9/6/18 at 12:13 am to Pussykat
What? You don't believe that there is a high end administration official who thinks Trump could push the button any day now, but don't worry we'll tackle him if he tries it? Sounds totes plausible to me.
This post was edited on 9/6/18 at 12:15 am
Posted on 9/6/18 at 12:23 am to NewYorkYankeeFan
quote:Nope, not at all. Almost everyone who cares is doing better.
But my question is simple. If the above 3 points are true, are you not gravely concerned with the stability and fitness of this president.
I learned during the Obama years that even an unaccomplished, inexperienced, mediocre intellect could be president without completely destroying the country. Throw in 20 more IQ points and some narcissism that makes one crave to be viewed as the man who revived American exceptionalism and we've got the best president in decades.
Posted on 9/6/18 at 12:28 am to timdonaghyswhistle
Yes, probably shadows him all day, protecting America from its retarded, juvenile, immoral, deranged leader, who somehow managed to get tax reform passed and removed the stranglehold on our economy just for starters.
Posted on 9/6/18 at 12:28 am to NewYorkYankeeFan
quote:
1. The article is not completely made up by the NYT.
Posted on 9/6/18 at 12:35 am to NewYorkYankeeFan
quote:
The article is not completely made up by the NYT. The article was as they say written by a member of the Trump Admin.
quote:
Whoever wrote the article isn't outright lying.
So trump is actually against "free people"
What does that mean?
Posted on 9/6/18 at 2:26 am to NewYorkYankeeFan
The Failing New York Times is fake news, this “article” is 100% FAKE NEWS! #TREASON
Posted on 9/6/18 at 3:21 am to NewYorkYankeeFan
quote:
But my question is simple. If the above 3 points are true, are you not gravely concerned with the stability and fitness of this president.
You asked for an answer so I will give you one.
Answer is, "NO!"
Why would this person's opinion on some of the President's platform be given higher regard than the President's? It's unsubstantiated and ANONYMOUS!!!! It was printed as an OP-ED. It is strictly an OPINION. How the frick am I supposed to value this "information" to any great degree at all?
You suffer from confirmation bias.
Posted on 9/6/18 at 6:24 am to NewYorkYankeeFan
quote:
But my question is simple. If the above 3 points are true, are you not gravely concerned with the stability and fitness of this president.
In a word, no.
We have known for some time that many Republicans are not thrilled with the idea of "president Trump", so an op-ed in the NYT that essentially proves, or at least gives credibility to, the idea of a "deep state" (ie, high ranking people in power with an agenda to protect the status quo); that also unequivocally proves sedition, will absolutely not sway me to start thinking that Trump is dangerous
Posted on 9/6/18 at 6:26 am to Jake88
quote:
I learned during the Obama years that even an unaccomplished, inexperienced, mediocre intellect could be president without completely destroying the country.
Posted on 9/6/18 at 6:27 am to NewYorkYankeeFan
quote:
So, I am attempting to operate in good faith here
quote:
NewYorkYankeeFan
Number of Posts: 4
Registered on: 4/4/2018
No you’re not.
Posted on 9/6/18 at 6:28 am to NewYorkYankeeFan
Lol you people want to believe something is true so damn bad, you have lost all touch with any semblance of reality....
The world would be a better place without you...
The world would be a better place without you...
Posted on 9/6/18 at 6:28 am to NewYorkYankeeFan
Posted on 9/6/18 at 6:34 am to NewYorkYankeeFan
Baking in your premise that the op-ed MUST be factually correct/accurate is where you're fricking up.
If your premise is incorrect, then all results that follow will be just as wrong.
If your premise is incorrect, then all results that follow will be just as wrong.
Posted on 9/6/18 at 6:35 am to NewYorkYankeeFan
quote:
The idea is IF these things are true how do you feel?
If ifs and buts were candies and nuts we’d all have a merry Christmas.
Moral of the story is gtfoh with hypotheticals.
Posted on 9/6/18 at 6:37 am to NewYorkYankeeFan
quote:
to get anywhere meaningful I think we have to accept three things.
LOL. So so typical.
quote:
appreciate some genuine responses.
Only, of course, after someone accepts your view of the situation.
Dear Politards, this is how to "debate" like a Proggie.
At least your predetermined bullshite didn't involve calling Trump supporters Nazis, racist, etc, or is that something too you automatically assume?
Posted on 9/6/18 at 6:38 am to NewYorkYankeeFan
I don’t believe the opinion piece is real because the NYT told me that the deep state didn’t exist.
Posted on 9/6/18 at 6:49 am to NewYorkYankeeFan
quote:
The article is not completely made up by the NYT.
Wrong to accept this as fact. Numerous articles quoting "anonymous" sources in the NY Times related to Trump have been proven wrong. They have issued a number of retractions. Not sure why you would accept the NY Times at its word. Says a lot about you.
quote:
Basically, this includes anyone with direct access to the president or who is a peer with multiple officials with direct access.
Wrong again. This could be someone in the Treasury or State Department that has virtually no interaction at all with the president and who rarely, if ever, has gone to the White House or even been in the same building... much less the same room... with Trump.
The bottom line is that anyone that watches CNN or MSNBC could have written this "op ed" piece. It was written in an exact way to appeal to the left leaning media. 20 Insiders that support Trump 100% could write op ed pieces and put their names to it and the NY Times would not print it.
Now... frick off.
This post was edited on 9/6/18 at 6:51 am
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News