- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Scott Bessent is setting the record straight at Treasury!!
Posted on 2/6/25 at 7:35 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 2/6/25 at 7:35 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
i agree, but we need it from doge as well, otherwise it doesn’t mean anything
You'll get it. Reams and reams of it. Better yet, ask for a few USBs, it's going to be tons, and tons, and tons. I'd imagine theyll make a website to such end.
0
Posted on 2/6/25 at 7:35 pm to goatmilker
been posted dozens of times already
the main one is impoundment
illegal data access to uncleared individuals is the other
the main one is impoundment
illegal data access to uncleared individuals is the other
This post was edited on 2/6/25 at 7:39 pm
Posted on 2/6/25 at 7:38 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:what a fricking clueless grandpa comment
It may be true now that they’re on “read only” to view the payments it’s clear that wasn’t the case initially.
Also says nothing about whether they have the ability to write new code into the system.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 7:39 pm to narddogg81
how so? be specific please.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 7:39 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
So all the lawsuits being filed aren’t alleging lawbreaking?
First lawsuits mean nothing in regards to him doing something illegal! Secondly where have you been the past decade where your party unleashed Lawfare?
quote:
what do you think about his conflicts of interest here? how would you feel if you were a competitor of one of his companies?
Where was your concern when the FDA was being run by a revolving door of Pharmaceutical Executives? How about the DoD being run by former Generals or MIC Executives? How about Treasury being run by Wall-street CEOs? You think the richest man in the world that has nothing to really gain because no one is going to come close to his wealth level would risk it all on this?
Posted on 2/6/25 at 7:40 pm to Draconian Sanctions
It’s amazing how adverse you are to the executive carrying out their Article 2 responsibilities. 
Posted on 2/6/25 at 7:40 pm to Draconian Sanctions
your team got shut down and the ball taken away. Now your team has 4 years of defense. And your defense consists of screaming at the sky, starting new articles of impeachment and using the media as your propaganda arm. Your defense sucks. Looking forward to four years of you crying like the bitch you are
Posted on 2/6/25 at 7:41 pm to ABearsFanNMS
quote:
First lawsuits mean nothing in regards to him doing something illegal!
How does one file a lawsuit that doesn’t allege lawbreaking?
As for the rest of your post, I have no problem at all with legitimate audit that’s done legally. I’m not defending any spending.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 7:41 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
What we’re seeing now is obvious damage control. Don’t be such a shill.
Talking about all of the crying from the leftists?
Posted on 2/6/25 at 7:42 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
So all the lawsuits being filed aren’t alleging lawbreaking? i’m sure some of them are bullshite but that. error my qualifies as an accusation.
They are literally claiming that the executive branch has no authority to audit the executive branch. Even if someone were tragically stupid enough to consider that as a valid argument there is still no accusation of lawbreaking.
quote:
tell me, what do you think about his conflicts of interest here? how would you feel if you were a competitor of one of his companies?
Where's this lawbreaking you were speaking of? Are you ready to admit that you simply pulled it out of your blown out arse?
Posted on 2/6/25 at 7:43 pm to Timeoday
We have the best coders
Posted on 2/6/25 at 7:46 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
How does one file a lawsuit that doesn’t allege lawbreaking?
I almost feel sorry for you for being this stupid but you're such a dishonest hack that you don't deserve pity.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 7:49 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
I have no problem at all with legitimate audit that’s done legally. I’m not defending any spending.
how many posts a day do you think you’re averaging at this point defending Democrat corruption?
500? 1000? 2000?
it’s quite the time investment. every day.
This post was edited on 2/6/25 at 7:51 pm
Posted on 2/6/25 at 7:50 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Any program would likely need root access to read the data. But that would be for execution purposes only.
Writing new code into something would mean you would have to have read and understand what the existing code is doing. I would imagine it’s not simple code or programming so that part would be highly unlikely.
Nobody is stealing anything. They are exposing the wasteful criminal spending of US Taxpayers money.
Writing new code into something would mean you would have to have read and understand what the existing code is doing. I would imagine it’s not simple code or programming so that part would be highly unlikely.
Nobody is stealing anything. They are exposing the wasteful criminal spending of US Taxpayers money.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 7:50 pm to Klark Kent
quote:
how many posts a day do you think you’re averaging at this point defending Democrat corruption?
500? 1000? 2000?
it’s quite the time investment. every day.
He thinks he's still getting paid.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 7:52 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Here is my hypothesis.
The team had months to prepare-- do you think they brought in only poindexters or included forensic accountants? If you understand GAAP / GASB, the accounting concepts and business functions are essentially the same as any other payment system once you are granted full access, read only or not. It's probably based on some COTS system, which are all conceptually the same. All of these federal systems were implemented by a big teams from a handful of consulting companies. If they wanted, Findng folks who implemented them is a no brainer.
They also came in with the President's mandate. I'm sure they horsecollared some folks and said "show me x..." or "I need you to pull y.."
And I guarantee you the system was also exhaustively documented. I'm not talking out of my butt here-- I implemented government ERP systems for 25 years. They didn't have to hack their way in. They knew the exact questions they wanted answered. Read-only is all they ever needed. I assume they handed off data to the poindexters after that.
This is accounting, not nuclear secrets.
The team had months to prepare-- do you think they brought in only poindexters or included forensic accountants? If you understand GAAP / GASB, the accounting concepts and business functions are essentially the same as any other payment system once you are granted full access, read only or not. It's probably based on some COTS system, which are all conceptually the same. All of these federal systems were implemented by a big teams from a handful of consulting companies. If they wanted, Findng folks who implemented them is a no brainer.
They also came in with the President's mandate. I'm sure they horsecollared some folks and said "show me x..." or "I need you to pull y.."
And I guarantee you the system was also exhaustively documented. I'm not talking out of my butt here-- I implemented government ERP systems for 25 years. They didn't have to hack their way in. They knew the exact questions they wanted answered. Read-only is all they ever needed. I assume they handed off data to the poindexters after that.
This is accounting, not nuclear secrets.
This post was edited on 2/6/25 at 8:00 pm
Posted on 2/6/25 at 7:53 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
How does one file a lawsuit that doesn’t allege lawbreaking?
A lawsuit is a civil matter not criminal in nature. If I was Democrat I could file a lawsuit saying Elon is a bad man and thus he make my pussy hurt! Would that prove he is doing something “illegal”?
quote:
I have no problem at all with legitimate audit that’s done legally. I’m not defending any spending.
Please explain then how the EO appointing DOGE and their subsequent actions are not legal……
This post was edited on 2/6/25 at 7:57 pm
Posted on 2/6/25 at 7:55 pm to udtiger
quote:
Is no one else concerned how much the SecTreas said he couldn't do things unless the Fed okayed it?
Treasury - in the Constitution
Federal Reserve - NOT in the Constitution
I believe that will change soon enough.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 8:04 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Simple audit....no reason to resign"? Right. He wasn't afraid of all the shite that was going to come out when Musk was finally able dig through all the hidden waste.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 8:07 pm to dgnx6
quote:
We have the best coders
They love their coffee!!
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News