- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS - Oral Argument in Jackson Abortion Case begins 9:00 Central - Link to Audio
Posted on 12/1/21 at 9:42 am to Wednesday
Posted on 12/1/21 at 9:42 am to Wednesday
This case is interesting, but I doubt anything changes. The world elites have a huge beef with the world population. This is their best way of curtailing over population
2
Posted on 12/1/21 at 9:42 am to Wednesday
literally the only thing that matters is that nobody can prove that life begins at any point after conception, but life definitely does not begin before.
moreover, it's not for the court to decide that but the states.
moreover, it's not for the court to decide that but the states.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 9:42 am to Wednesday
Oral
Posted on 12/1/21 at 9:43 am to VoxDawg
Gorsuch: the Const is neutral on the question, but this is left to states or congress? Correct?
Miss - Yes.
Gorsuch: so states would be able to permit abortions even if you prevail.
Miss: yes.
Miss - Yes.
Gorsuch: so states would be able to permit abortions even if you prevail.
Miss: yes.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 9:44 am to xxTIMMYxx
quote:
This case is interesting, but I doubt anything changes. The world elites have a huge beef with the world population. This is their best way of curtailing over population
This is the first time Roe Has been reconsidered since Casey (30 yrs ago). A decision either way would be huge
Posted on 12/1/21 at 9:44 am to Wednesday
quote:
Gorsuch: the Const is neutral on the question, but this is left to states or congress? Correct?
Miss - Yes.
Gorsuch: so states would be able to permit abortions even if you prevail.
Miss: yes.
That's not an unreasonable request, and one that all of us have been making from a Constitutional standpoint.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 9:44 am to Wednesday
I’m sad to say, I want this to be overturned simply to see the melt.
I derive a great deal of pleasure from it.
I derive a great deal of pleasure from it.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 9:46 am to VoxDawg
Now for the agents of death . . .
Mississippi’s ban is unconstitutional under precedent
Mississippi’s ban is unconstitutional under precedent
Posted on 12/1/21 at 9:47 am to Wednesday
“Forcing women to give birth” 
“State takes control of woman’s body fundamental imposition on her liberty.” (Now do vaccines bitch)
“Mississippi ban would hurt poor people.”
“State takes control of woman’s body fundamental imposition on her liberty.” (Now do vaccines bitch)
“Mississippi ban would hurt poor people.”
Posted on 12/1/21 at 9:47 am to Wednesday
This woman arguing for Jackson Women's has a pleasant voice for the evil that she is representing.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 9:47 am to anc
quote:
Wise Latina is arguing with Mississippi SG. This isn't the way the SCOTUS should operate.
Right. What's your point? Do you think Obama would put someone on that court who would actually operate the way the SCOTUS should operate? Hell NO. He would put someone on that court that would help usher in the "Hope and Change" of turning the U.S. into a post constitutional Authoritarian nightmare.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 9:48 am to Wednesday
"the other interest at stake" is the new leftist definition for baby
Posted on 12/1/21 at 9:48 am to Wednesday
The argument of "a woman's right to choose" still deliberately sidesteps the pesky details of personal responsibility and consequences to their actions.
There are obvious rape/incest exceptions, but let's be honest, what % of abortions performed meet that criteria, opposed to convenience/birth control?
There are obvious rape/incest exceptions, but let's be honest, what % of abortions performed meet that criteria, opposed to convenience/birth control?
Posted on 12/1/21 at 9:49 am to VoxDawg
Thomas gets her to trip on first question. She admits that states can regulate based on a South Carolina case.
This post was edited on 12/1/21 at 9:51 am
Posted on 12/1/21 at 9:50 am to Wednesday
Clarence - I assume you are relying on autonomy
Death lady - yes
Clarence- after Casey we had a SC case where lady convicted of child neglect bc she ingested cocaine post viability. If she has done so before viability would state be able to intervene?
Death lady - struggling with answering this.
Clarence - basically asking if woman has bodily autonomy in ingesting substance pre viability.
Death Lady - avoiding questions
Death lady - yes
Clarence- after Casey we had a SC case where lady convicted of child neglect bc she ingested cocaine post viability. If she has done so before viability would state be able to intervene?
Death lady - struggling with answering this.
Clarence - basically asking if woman has bodily autonomy in ingesting substance pre viability.
Death Lady - avoiding questions
Posted on 12/1/21 at 9:51 am to anc
Posted on 12/1/21 at 9:51 am to Wednesday
quote:
Forcing women to give birth”
“State takes control of woman’s body fundamental imposition on her liberty.” (Now do vaccines bitch)
“Mississippi ban would hurt poor people.”
How long until they invoke The Handmaid's Tale?
Posted on 12/1/21 at 9:52 am to VoxDawg
The Agent of Death is not answering the questions.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 9:52 am to Wednesday
Death Lady referring to brief saying that if we outlaw women having late abortions their lifestyle is harmed.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 9:53 am to VoxDawg
"abortion has allowed women to be equal in society" tf does this even mean?
Page 3 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News