- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS - Oral Argument in Jackson Abortion Case begins 9:00 Central - Link to Audio
Posted on 12/1/21 at 10:23 am to hogcard1964
Posted on 12/1/21 at 10:23 am to hogcard1964
Julie Rikelman of CRR
This post was edited on 12/1/21 at 10:23 am
2
Posted on 12/1/21 at 10:30 am to Pettifogger
quote:
Center for reproductive rights
ministry of love
Posted on 12/1/21 at 10:32 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Abortion should not be federal. Let the States decide. And the prog filth all live in prog filth States mostly so what's the problem?
Esactly. And maybe if that were the case some of the liberals living in red states would leave for the democrat utopias.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 10:33 am to Wednesday
So I've been listening for about 30 minutes. What argument is winning? Legalese isn't my forte.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 10:33 am to Pettifogger
sounds like breyer is on board
Posted on 12/1/21 at 10:33 am to hogcard1964
quote:
Who's "Death Woman"?
The atty arguing against the MS abortion restriction law.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 10:33 am to Wednesday
quote:
Death Lady referring to brief saying that if we outlaw women having late abortions their lifestyle is harmed.
Wait, is she saying men can't get pregnant?
How dare she!
She should be canceled for transphobia!
Posted on 12/1/21 at 10:34 am to Homesick Tiger
quote:
What argument is winning?
Thomas & Alito have nuked this poor lady from orbit.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 10:36 am to VoxDawg
I’m baaaack
Death Lady going down in flames
shite even Breyer on her arse
Death Lady going down in flames
shite even Breyer on her arse
Posted on 12/1/21 at 10:37 am to Wednesday
What are they arguing for here?
Posted on 12/1/21 at 10:37 am to Ag Zwin
popping in and out on this.
The RIGHT of an abortion.
She actually said women should not have to travel to get an abortion
In the same context I needed surgery that only Duke Hosp could do. I had to travel from State to State to get there. Is it my RIGHT to not have to have traveled? It was the ability to control my body to LIVE and not be in pain.
So when will someone ask about the RIGHTS that people have not to get an unproven vaccination?
No woman has a RIGHT to an abortion. If there is an emergency that she will die it is called a C-section.
Also someone bring up the fine in 6 figures if anyone accidentally interferes with turtle eggs on the beach; yet it is a right to kill a human baby but a sea turtle is protected.
Abortion should not be federal R v Wade was erroneous.
Make abortion decided per State.
The RIGHT of an abortion.
She actually said women should not have to travel to get an abortion
In the same context I needed surgery that only Duke Hosp could do. I had to travel from State to State to get there. Is it my RIGHT to not have to have traveled? It was the ability to control my body to LIVE and not be in pain.
So when will someone ask about the RIGHTS that people have not to get an unproven vaccination?
No woman has a RIGHT to an abortion. If there is an emergency that she will die it is called a C-section.
Also someone bring up the fine in 6 figures if anyone accidentally interferes with turtle eggs on the beach; yet it is a right to kill a human baby but a sea turtle is protected.
Abortion should not be federal R v Wade was erroneous.
Make abortion decided per State.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 10:38 am to Homesick Tiger
quote:
So I've been listening for about 30 minutes. What argument is winning? Legalese isn't my forte.
unclear, i disagree with virtually everything this woman is saying, but she's good and articulate. the opposing counsel, not so much.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 10:40 am to Masterag
I love how she frames "unplanned pregnancy" in terms of it being an absolute mystery as to what's causing it.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 10:40 am to cajunangelle
A stark divide on abortion, which this ruling could facilitate (not sure how likely it is), would be a huge asset in drawing the much-needed lines in America and either setting up divorce or empowering the states to operate increasingly autonomously.
It's a big moment. If Roe survives at full strength, it's yet another sign that it's absurd people divided on this topic continue to live under the same roof.
It's a big moment. If Roe survives at full strength, it's yet another sign that it's absurd people divided on this topic continue to live under the same roof.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 10:41 am to Wednesday
Since this is the oral argument on the case, I can't imagine that they're going to do anything this week, right? This strikes me as one of those decisions that they hand out right before the end of the term in June.
I'd love to get an up or down on this sooner, but I'm skeptical that this'll happen like that.
I'd love to get an up or down on this sooner, but I'm skeptical that this'll happen like that.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 10:42 am to Masterag
quote:
but she's good and articulate.
I have not heard her answer directly one single question aside from softballs lobbed by Wise Latina.
Her argument is that poor people are harmed and that women have a lifestyle impaired if they are “forced to have a baby.”
She’s a moron.
She has not made one logical argument why Roe makes sense aside from the Supreme Court decided Roe.
There is no difference btwn Roe and Pleasy v Ferguson. None. Alito schooled her
Posted on 12/1/21 at 10:43 am to Pettifogger
quote:
yet another sign that it's absurd people divided on this topic continue to live under the same roof.
fair point, but considering the fact that virtually all metro areas in the southern/midwestern red states are deep blue, that makes an even split very challenging.
Posted on 12/1/21 at 10:43 am to VoxDawg
quote:
Since this is the oral argument on the case, I can't imagine that they're going to do anything this week, right? This strikes me as one of those decisions that they hand out right before the end of the term in June.
Correct. They will publish in their next round of publishing So im assuming June. There’s no emergency- like for example a stay of execution or something
Posted on 12/1/21 at 10:43 am to Wednesday
@JerryDunleavy
Sotomayor just compared an unborn child recoiling at being poked or prodded to a brain dead person having some sort of physical reaction
Sotomayor just compared an unborn child recoiling at being poked or prodded to a brain dead person having some sort of physical reaction
Posted on 12/1/21 at 10:44 am to alphaandomega
The y would simply use this as a justification in painting the Constitution as outdated and in need of being replaced.
Page 6 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News