- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS Tariff Ruling is in: 6-3 against tariffs.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 10:39 am to Night Vision
Posted on 2/20/26 at 10:39 am to Night Vision
the clapping seals are going to fight and die on the tariff hill. not because of some deep understanding of their effectiveness or necessity, but because donald john trump is butthurt that he was ruled against
always and forever
always and forever
1
Posted on 2/20/26 at 10:40 am to wackatimesthree
quote:Yes. The same people that "voted for Trump" also "voted for Congress". Honestly, they're not as far apart as many people seem to think.
The system is working just like it's supposed to.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 10:41 am to beaux duke
Dumbasses everywhere today.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 10:42 am to Centinel
quote:For all his faults, Newt Gingrich, leveraged this by nationalizing the '94 election. Contract with America was a good idea--with RINO execution.
*My* House Rep and Senator are the good guys. It's all the *other* House Reps and Senators that are the problem.
/'Murica
Posted on 2/20/26 at 10:42 am to BCreed1
Because of this expected ruling, Democrats are abandoning the IEEPA strategy. Instead, they are pivoting to the "Clean Competition Act," which seeks to create a carbon border adjustment through legislation rather than executive order.
Fact.
Fact.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 10:43 am to NC_Tigah
Get ready for Free Trade!
Where other countries pay no tarriffs and have no regulations and we pay tarriffs and have all the regulations!
Where other countries pay no tarriffs and have no regulations and we pay tarriffs and have all the regulations!
Posted on 2/20/26 at 10:43 am to BigGreenTiger
People were taking opinions from other doctors to counter Fauci's claims. I don't believe there is a person out there that is smarter than Bessent when it comes to business, economics or the law regarding them. If there is then file a lawsuit and take it to court because that is the only way you can prove it. It took them a year to get the first one to Scotus. They only have 5 more to go.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 10:44 am to stout
quote:Or worse whoever has a "R" or "D" next to their name. Team jersey politics are killing us.
Too lazy to do any research so they just pull the lever for the familiar names.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 10:45 am to GeauxPanthers2
quote:Nah. We already have them. Voters don't want them.
Term limits is the only solution.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 10:45 am to AlterEd
The SC had to decide what we already knew, as the weak Republicans in congress can't do their job.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 10:45 am to NC_Tigah
Not at all worried about this and will not discount that this was prolly expected and part of a tactical advance of larger strategic goals.
Also and as a fruitful side benefit, it will serve up on a platter legions of libtards loudly purporting Constitutional and economic expertise -which the vast majority lack or disdain, in any case- which will be memorialized and used in perpetuiy to illustrate their massive retardation.
That is all…
Also and as a fruitful side benefit, it will serve up on a platter legions of libtards loudly purporting Constitutional and economic expertise -which the vast majority lack or disdain, in any case- which will be memorialized and used in perpetuiy to illustrate their massive retardation.
That is all…
Posted on 2/20/26 at 10:46 am to ob1pimpbobi
quote:Well, we never had any soo....
Any leverage the US had in trade is all gone.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 10:46 am to Taxing Authority
quote:
Nah. We already have them. Voters don't want them.
No, voters don't want term limits for *their* politicians. They most certainly want them for everyone else's.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 10:47 am to NC_Tigah
You mean the SCOTUS is biased? Interesting...
Posted on 2/20/26 at 10:48 am to Knight of Old
quote:
Not at all worried about this and will not discount that this was prolly expected and part of a tactical advance of larger strategic goals.
Ah yes. They wasted a bunch of time and resources on this and created likely an absolute repayment legal debacle because it was intentional 4d underwater parcheesi strategy by Trump
Posted on 2/20/26 at 10:49 am to Taxing Authority
Yea because the largest consumer market in the entire world is not leverage at all.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 10:51 am to Night Vision
quote:Kinda addressed in today's ruling, tho. You can't enact broad tariffs under the grounds that everything is a threat/emergecy.
Read that again… on NATIONAL SECURITY GROUNDS. I mean, everything Trump is dealing with could be classified as National Security Grounds.
quote:Hmm....
Just a guess..
I imagine Trump might post his disappointment about the ruling, and he will go on to say he has no choice but to expand Section 232. Or, expand on other tariff powers yet unnamed.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 10:51 am to BeeFense5
quote:
Ah yes. They wasted a bunch of time and resources on this and created likely an absolute repayment legal debacle because it was intentional 4d underwater parcheesi strategy by Trump
And we haven't even gotten to the new uncertainty in the market that will be created when Trump rolls his new tariffs under different statutes.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 10:52 am to Ailsa
“So it could be codified?”
Congress could pass a statute allowing the tariffs or as Kav explained in dissent, the president could use other statutes to institute most, if not all of the tariffs.
Congress could pass a statute allowing the tariffs or as Kav explained in dissent, the president could use other statutes to institute most, if not all of the tariffs.
Page 18 of 26
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News