Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Simple Solution: only permit one protest at a time per place | Page 5 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Simple Solution: only permit one protest at a time per place

Posted on 8/13/17 at 12:38 pm to
Posted by cave canem
pullarius dominus
Member since Oct 2012
12186 posts
Posted on 8/13/17 at 12:38 pm to
If given the choice I would not spend one cent on protecting either group of assholes, in fact I would pass out weapons to both sides and hope they wipe each other out.

This country needs an enema and wherever both of these groups are is an excellent place to start.

Posted by cr32pll29
Member since Apr 2017
500 posts
Posted on 8/13/17 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

these marches require permits. the "Unite the Right" acquired one and had the legal ground to march

i have not seen confirmation that any of the leftist groups secured a permit to interfere with the march. if they didn't, they should have been removed/arrested

if you want to stop these violent clashes, just permit one group per space per time and arrest any antagonizer who shows up to use violence to silence the march. this would have solved the issues at Berkeley, VA, etc




That is the problem, "they" do not want to stop it, "they" want to increase it, to justify the deployment of a totalitarian "Police state"

This post was edited on 8/13/17 at 12:48 pm
Posted by rooster108bm
Member since Nov 2010
3180 posts
Posted on 8/13/17 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

That is the problem, "they" do not want to stop it, "they" want to increase it, to justify the deployment of a totalitarian "Police state" 



Correct. They don't care if the fascists or communists win because they will be the dictator either way.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
163619 posts
Posted on 8/13/17 at 4:50 pm to
best thread vote and

quote:



Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
27490 posts
Posted on 8/13/17 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

Nice premise to set up that any time the right protests, it's without merit.

that's not what i was doing at all, honestly... i'm not trying to marginalize the right and their need or basis for protesting... i'm just pointing out that that there isn't a lot of evidence of the right attacking the left, but that's mainly because they don't protest in the same manner, and there are usually individual cases of retaliation from the right... that's all...

quote:

I mean are you going to actually try to say the ridiculous march for science and pussy hat march were based on something with substance?

no that shite was stupid, and people showed their arse during those.... i'm sure you can find stuff that i posted during that time that would back up the fact that i condemned the shite then, just as i am now...

i support equality for women, and as a secular humanist, i value the shite out of science/logic/reasoning, but it wasn't handled properly at all... at all...
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126669 posts
Posted on 8/13/17 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

When you show up in helmets carrying shields and clubs you aren't coming to "protest"


Both sides did that

don't let facts get in the way.
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
26348 posts
Posted on 8/13/17 at 5:01 pm to
There were militia groups there that Terry Mc Auliffe said had better equipment than the police did. And not a shot was fired gee I wonder why not?
Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
55453 posts
Posted on 8/13/17 at 5:01 pm to
Correct. And the police should have separated the group with the permit in their area from the other idiots. They were told to stand down and let it roll.

Why do mayors in these towns do this? Was Kip Holden the only mayor not to allow extremist idiots to take over? I remember when the BLM moron was arrested he pretty much stated BR was the first town he and his ilk tried to terrorize where the police actually prevented them from breaking the law. Lol He couldn't believe it.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126669 posts
Posted on 8/13/17 at 5:03 pm to
quote:

There were militia groups there that Terry Mc Auliffe said had better equipment than the police did. And not a shot was fired gee I wonder why not?




thats fricking wild
Posted by G The Tiger Fan
Member since Apr 2015
116399 posts
Posted on 8/13/17 at 5:04 pm to
quote:

i have not seen confirmation that any of the leftist groups secured a permit to interfere with the march.
They don't need one. Police departments in cities with leftist leadership will let them do what they want.
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
26348 posts
Posted on 8/13/17 at 5:06 pm to
Not at all. ANTIFA didn't have a death wish is why not. Attacking men armed with AR15's when you have sticks is never wise
This post was edited on 8/13/17 at 5:07 pm
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
163619 posts
Posted on 8/13/17 at 5:08 pm to
quote:

Both sides did that

don't let facts get in the way.

pics or links? they called themselves UNITETHERIGHT and we know antifa showed up w/o a permit supposedly-- ready to riot and fight, that is a given.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
470617 posts
Posted on 8/13/17 at 5:09 pm to
Oh the Nazis came prepared

They were not allowing another Berkeley
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
26348 posts
Posted on 8/13/17 at 5:09 pm to
Police intel had to know ANTIFA was busing in protesters, and they had to also know they had no permit to assemble.

They let it happen.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
163619 posts
Posted on 8/13/17 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

Oh the Nazis came prepared

They were not allowing another Berkeley
I was not sure. thanks.

were ALL of the UnitetheRighters KKK nazi's?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
470617 posts
Posted on 8/13/17 at 5:16 pm to
No

But a huge chunk were
Posted by MizzouBS
Missouri
Member since Dec 2014
6810 posts
Posted on 8/13/17 at 5:19 pm to
The 1st amendment does not cover speech that insights violence or hate.

David Gurgen explained this earlier. This is something that has been held up by the courts.
Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
55453 posts
Posted on 8/13/17 at 5:23 pm to
Lol. This is great.

Let's redefine the first amendment now!

I knew this was the next step for your ilk.

Coming from a Mizzou fan I shouldn't be surprised. How's that cow towing to Prog lies and hate speech working out for your esteemed University? Loll lol
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
470617 posts
Posted on 8/13/17 at 5:25 pm to
Having a peaceful protest does not fall into "fighting words"

Posted by MizzouBS
Missouri
Member since Dec 2014
6810 posts
Posted on 8/13/17 at 5:29 pm to
Not by me but the US court system.

first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram