Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us So the CBS news says now there was two dozen boxes | Page 3 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: So the CBS news says now there was two dozen boxes

Posted on 8/14/22 at 6:52 pm to
Posted by Canada_Baw
Member since Dec 2017
2489 posts
Posted on 8/14/22 at 6:52 pm to
6 in one hand, half dozen in another.

Tree fitty here, tower fitty dere.

A box a, a satchel, a suitcase, a ream.
Pages of papers, upon papers.; with footnotes and anecdotes and ridiculous
similes.

14 million letters in Times New Roman font but only 26 million in Georgian.

But whats important is that we inflate the numbers a little but so the economy looks a little better and 97% of america isnt going to starve to death when their used car loan defaults and their medical provider says shite sorry you dont have 87,000,000 for a physical.

Posted by NCIS_76
Member since Jan 2021
5246 posts
Posted on 8/14/22 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

I will say that the whole “anything I leave the office with is declassified cause I said so” schtick seems like some serious horse shite rule that nobody should be okay with


No. You’re digging schite out of your arse and believing what you are being told.
This post was edited on 8/14/22 at 6:54 pm
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
39274 posts
Posted on 8/14/22 at 6:57 pm to
Seems like your buddy whose arse you were just smooching agrees with me that the rule is correct as I stated it - take it up with him once you finishing puckering up.
Posted by Aubeachgirl
Member since May 2020
20 posts
Posted on 8/14/22 at 6:58 pm to
What are you talking about?? No Executive Order is required to declassify papers.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 8/14/22 at 7:01 pm to
quote:

and yet that is the rule.


It's really not. Retroactively declassifying something as a private citizen isn't a thing.

And when you're told that you have possession of things that you, a private citizen, shouldn't have...and you still keep them? Then lie about them? And demonstrate knowledge that they're sensitive?

You're about to find out about actual rules, not magical telepathic declassification.
Posted by genuineLSUtiger
Nashville
Member since Sep 2005
77203 posts
Posted on 8/14/22 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

. 20 to life at Rikers.


Trump will live the last couple of decades of his life on Riker’s Island whitewashed from history by the new Marxists.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
43628 posts
Posted on 8/14/22 at 7:04 pm to
They are finding them days later, just like votes. Also similar to votes, the “recently found” boxes will help the Democrats (deep state).
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
137217 posts
Posted on 8/14/22 at 7:05 pm to
quote:

Retroactively declassifying
What is it you think you might be talking about?
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
39274 posts
Posted on 8/14/22 at 7:05 pm to
They hired a videographer to help with… videos?

You got em now!
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
110357 posts
Posted on 8/14/22 at 7:05 pm to
quote:

quote:If Trump issued an executive order to declassify these particular documents, there would be an executive order number and we could all go to the Federal Register and see it

That’s the problem. We don’t know how these things are recorded when they leave with a outgoing President. No one will make that clear


Yep. Ask him to explain in detail how Obama, W, Clinton, el al., all meticulously declassified and/or catalogued every document associated with their administrations and how whatever DRUMPF did was so uniquely different, nefarious, AND criminal.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 8/14/22 at 7:06 pm to
We're discussing why a private citizen can't decide to retroactively declassify something, when he certainly didn't decide to do so as President.

Try to keep up.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
137217 posts
Posted on 8/14/22 at 7:07 pm to
quote:

And when you're told that you have possession of things that you, a private citizen, shouldn't have...and you still keep them?

What part of full cooperation with NARA in June did you miss?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
137217 posts
Posted on 8/14/22 at 7:08 pm to
quote:

retroactively declassify
That has no application to Trump. Try to keep up.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
137217 posts
Posted on 8/14/22 at 7:10 pm to
quote:

They hired a videographer to help with… videos?
The word you are searching for is "Producer" .... TWICE!

Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 8/14/22 at 7:11 pm to
quote:

What part of full cooperation with NARA in June did you miss?


The part where they were moving things in and out of the room after June? Or where they signed a statement in June claiming they no longer had any restricted materials (since proven false)?

You're free to point to why you ignored those - or are you so far behind you're not there yet?
Posted by themunch
bottom of the list
Member since Jan 2007
71638 posts
Posted on 8/14/22 at 7:12 pm to
All their stories grow in time.
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
39274 posts
Posted on 8/14/22 at 7:12 pm to
quote:

The word you are searching for is "Producer" .... TWICE!


Did he produce… videos?

The horror!!
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 8/14/22 at 7:13 pm to
quote:

That has no application to Trump


It surely does, when nobody ever raised the issue of a blanket declassification until Thursday of this week, despite discussions about returning the material he shouldn't have starting in May of 2021.

But, regardless, it's not like either of the 3 statutes cited to get the search warrant on Mar-A-Lago last week requires a document be classified. So, again, moot point even if he did have some magical retroactive declassification powers. Which, again, he doesn't.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
28155 posts
Posted on 8/14/22 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

HEY! a-hole!

Are these documents subject to a declassification order or not? If you say they are, cite us to the order. It’s really that simple.

Of course you can’t. That’s why you are being a dick instead.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram