Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Some redacted text in the Epstein files can be read when highlighted | Page 2 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Some redacted text in the Epstein files can be read when highlighted

Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:42 pm to
Posted by RelicBatches86
Florida
Member since Nov 2024
1217 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:42 pm to
If done intentionally, it would break the law because they are supposed to protect victims identity.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
11843 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:45 pm to
So...whaddduzitsay?
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
87435 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:47 pm to
Okay so where is the proof Israel and Trump raped kids?


Because that's all anyone cares about.






Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
87435 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

lulz

It shouldn't be redacted anyway. Good job Bondi! This one might very well trump the binders in embarrassment


More proof no one actually cared about the files.


Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
96019 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:49 pm to
Trump the most transparent Prez ever
Posted by deathvalleytiger10
Member since Sep 2009
9199 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

How could they frick up something so simple? How did no one think of this?


This is the government. It does not matter who is "in charge". They work in government because they can't work in the private sector.

Post after post, not necessarily this one, acting like Trump's DOJ is the problem.

No, it is the government as a whole that is the problem.
Posted by tigersbh
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
12875 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:58 pm to
Too bad it wasn’t a picture of trump saying “gotcha!”.
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 2:59 pm
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
6516 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:01 pm to
I thought it might work for the blacked out images too.
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
6516 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

How could they frick up something so simple? How did no one think of this?


Anons have known about this for years now.
Posted by NBR_Exile
Houston via Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2012
1919 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

I thought it might work for the blacked out images too.


It shouldn't. If the files were turned into images (rasterized) than the blacked out areas would almost certainty not be visible. But if the actual PDF's were redacted and kept in PDF form than it is definitely possible. PDF works in layers. Those layers can be pulled apart potentially.

Curriculum Vitae: I worked in the printing business for over 40 years. Started totally photo based but helped start the electronic printing business that used PostScript that essentially become PDF.
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 3:18 pm
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
56499 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:18 pm to
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
6516 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

It shouldn't. If the files were turned into images (rasterized) than the blacked out areas would almost certainty not be visible


Right. They did the images correctly. They wanted people to be able to read though. By design.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
121020 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:20 pm to
This is day 1 legal document type protection. What an embarrassment.
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
6516 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:21 pm to
It was deliberate. It's called "plausible deniability". Good luck with it.
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 3:22 pm
Posted by FLTech
Member since Sep 2017
26594 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:22 pm to
Bingo.
Posted by NBR_Exile
Houston via Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2012
1919 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

It shouldn't. If the files were turned into images (rasterized) than the blacked out areas would almost certainty not be visible


Right. They did the images correctly. They wanted people to be able to read though. By design.


You're probably right. I tend to think too litrerally
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
6516 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:26 pm to
Watch the same people who were bitching about them not releasing everything now pivot to saying they were amateurs by not "redacting things properly." It's hilarious. As they pivot, realize again that these people have no interest in the victims. Only in getting Trump. Their bitching about this proves it beyond doubt.

These stupid frickers can't help but step on their own dicks.
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 3:27 pm
Posted by Tvilletiger
PVB
Member since Oct 2015
5933 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:29 pm to
This was absolutely done by someone who knew what they were doing. Not a good look here. It’s burning down fast.
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
6516 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:29 pm to
Libs are being torched in real time. Enjoy it.
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
6516 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:33 pm to
I find myself agreeing with you more and more again. What gives? Do you trust the plan or not?

You're right. The anons knew. For years now.
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 3:35 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram