- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Epstein story is like a Rorschach test.
Posted on 2/14/26 at 2:08 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
Posted on 2/14/26 at 2:08 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
I’d be willing to bet my life savings he was MOSSAD
Posted on 2/14/26 at 2:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Just to update you, when the witch hunt dies down and exits the public discourse, they'll all be back.
Still doubling down on wrong and stupid. To update you, don't bet on it.
"Ghislaine Maxwell was arrested for trafficking minors. Will more people be held accountable."
"There are ongoing investigations."
So yes, there is evidence of more of this shite. It's still being investigated. SFP's schtick here is to claim it's not happening until which time he sees the evidence himself. Trying to win internet arguments based on this like a child. And when that evidence is made public and the people involved are arrested he will act like he knew this shite the entire time knowing nobody is going to scour through his eleventy million posts to show him to be a bold faced liar.
This post was edited on 2/14/26 at 2:14 pm
Posted on 2/14/26 at 2:11 pm to Rip Torner
More ready than most. More ready than you.
Posted on 2/14/26 at 2:13 pm to RescueT
I am sure you are lol no doubt Patriot Food supply has you prepared for anarchy. The naivety of many is astounding
Posted on 2/14/26 at 2:15 pm to AlterEd
And Mandelson has already been replaced. It took a couple days.
So using him as some example of a world leader whose absence would cause shockwaves is a bit of faulty reasoning.
So using him as some example of a world leader whose absence would cause shockwaves is a bit of faulty reasoning.
Posted on 2/14/26 at 2:17 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
And Mandelson has already been replaced. It took a couple days.
So using him as some example of a world leader whose absence would cause shockwaves is a bit of faulty reasoning
The context would be if it was all done suddenly, as I've been saying. It's being brought down, but in a controlled manner. Too much all at once would be too big of a shock to the system.
Posted on 2/14/26 at 2:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
As I was saying. Like a child.
Posted on 2/14/26 at 2:20 pm to AlterEd
quote:
SFP's schtick here is to claim it's not happening until which time he sees the evidence himself.
No. I am only talking about the evidence being used by you (and those similar to you) to jump to conclusions you're jumping to.
So I ask again: what direct, credible evidence are you relying on ?
Posted on 2/14/26 at 2:20 pm to Rip Torner
You grossly underestimate some men. There are some who haven’t been duped into the demonization and feminization of the culture. Who aren’t blind to the circus of left/right polar politics that’s blinding this country. Big tvs and sports mind numbing you into a walking coma. Just because you aren’t ready, doesn’t mean some aren’t.
Posted on 2/14/26 at 2:20 pm to AlterEd
quote:
The context would be if it was all done suddenly, as I've been saying. It's being brought down, but in a controlled manner. Too much all at once would be too big of a shock to the system.
Posted on 2/14/26 at 2:24 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
This article sums up my position on Epstein
Agree completely. A 20 year saga of "not enough evidence to convict" that amounts to a political football used by both sides.
Posted on 2/14/26 at 2:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No
Yes, you are. And now you're lying.
quote:
Serious crimes against underage girls were committed.
By Epstein and Maxwell? Sure
MAYBE Prince Andrew
This is some more 1984 type frickin doublespeak, by the way. I claimed you are doing what I just quoted you doing. You then denied it and did the exact thing I said you were doing in the same frickin post.
Posted on 2/14/26 at 2:30 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Yes, you are. And now you're lying.
I've said no direct, credible evidence has been presented.
You realize that's a LOT different than saying nothing is happening, right?
quote:
This is some more 1984 type frickin doublespeak
You talking about yourself?
Are we talking about Epstein's orbit or only Epstein and Maxwell? Because you've referenced people in the orbit in this thread, as well as supposed prosecutions against people other than Epstein and Maxwell. But if you want to walk that back and say you're only talking about Epstein and Maxwell (and nobody else), now is the time to declare that.
So which is it?
Posted on 2/14/26 at 2:30 pm to AlterEd
quote:
The context would be if it was all done suddenly, as I've been saying. It's being brought down, but in a controlled manner. Too much all at once would be too big of a shock to the system.
Peter Mandelson’s last known contact with Epstein was over 10 years ago.
How slow do we need to go to not shock the system?
One Bond villain per decade? Can we do a few more? Speed up the pace a bit, but not get into zombie apocalypse levels?
Posted on 2/14/26 at 2:30 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
One Bond villain per decade? Can we do a few more? Speed up the pace a bit, but not get into zombie apocalypse levels?
Posted on 2/14/26 at 2:33 pm to AlterEd
What happened to the diddy case…
Posted on 2/14/26 at 2:36 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
One Bond villain per decade? Can we do a few more? Speed up the pace a bit, but not get into zombie apocalypse levels
I wish it were happening faster too.
Posted on 2/14/26 at 2:36 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
Peter Mandelson’s last known contact with Epstein was over 10 years ago.
How slow do we need to go to not shock the system?
One Bond villain per decade? Can we do a few more? Speed up the pace a bit, but not get into zombie apocalypse levels?
This actually made me think of a follow up.
Mandleson resigned for emails being released that do not imply or indicate any illegality, and simply show an association with Epstein.
Why weren't these emails released to force his hand in 2020? They aren't involved in any criminal prosecution and they clearly don't name any victim Why were 2 different Trump DOJs so conflicted in releasing them, to the point of refusal under Bondi?
Posted on 2/14/26 at 2:47 pm to SlowFlowPro
I can only assume they were focused on criminal charges.
But no one in any official capacity looks good on this topic.
But no one in any official capacity looks good on this topic.
Popular
Back to top


0




