- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/16/22 at 7:12 am to BoarEd
Looks like this is based primarily in the standing issue.
I haven't looked at the full history, but I imagine this is not a decision on the merits themselves.
I haven't looked at the full history, but I imagine this is not a decision on the merits themselves.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 7:17 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I haven't looked at the full history, but I imagine this is not a decision on the merits themselves.
It isn’t. His writ is only asking SCOTUS to force the trial court to hear the merits.
This post was edited on 11/16/22 at 7:20 am
Posted on 11/16/22 at 7:20 am to Intelligent
Certainly resolving this one way or another is a bad thing, right?
But continue with your brilliant and logical arguments, please. They say a lot about what you are.
But continue with your brilliant and logical arguments, please. They say a lot about what you are.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 8:06 am to Lynxrufus2012
quote:
Certainly resolving this one way or another is a bad thing, right?
But continue with your brilliant and logical arguments, please. They say a lot about what you are.
it’s been resolved. Biden won. Trump lost. 
Posted on 11/16/22 at 8:11 am to BoarEd
Ed- don’t get excited.
Anyone can file a writ application.
The SCOTUS denies well over 90%.
This guy is self represented, which well over 99% of the time means he’s so nuts he can’t find anyone to represent him.
I find it highly unlikely-and by unlikely I mean less likely than me dying of Covid unlikely- that the Supreme Court will hear this case.
Anyone can file a writ application.
The SCOTUS denies well over 90%.
This guy is self represented, which well over 99% of the time means he’s so nuts he can’t find anyone to represent him.
I find it highly unlikely-and by unlikely I mean less likely than me dying of Covid unlikely- that the Supreme Court will hear this case.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 8:17 am to Wednesday
If the mods hurry up and delete this thread, we can enjoy a few hours of a hungover boared bitching about freedom of speech after lunch.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 8:20 am to Intelligent
Come on comrade. Please allow us to prove you were right all along. In doing so it will help us heal.
I mean, you do think you were right all along, don't you?
I mean, you do think you were right all along, don't you?
Posted on 11/16/22 at 8:25 am to BoarEd
quote:
BoarEd
Posted on 11/16/22 at 8:28 am to BoarEd
This is sad lol
Everyone knows nothing will happen
Everyone knows nothing will happen
Posted on 11/16/22 at 8:31 am to BoarEd
Nothing will come out of this. Nothing.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 8:57 am to Indefatigable
quote:
It isn’t. His writ is only asking SCOTUS to force the trial court to hear the merits.
What I figured.
Classic BorEd
Posted on 11/16/22 at 8:58 am to BoarEd
quote:
BoarEd
Where did you find this?
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:00 am to BoarEd
quote:
BoarEd
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:01 am to BoarEd
Amazing the amount of people who need to believe this. Boared just keeps trolling you guys along and you just lap his shite up.
It's comical
It's comical
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:03 am to TigernMS12
quote:
TigernMS12
And who the frick might you be?
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:06 am to BoarEd
quote:
The Supreme Court is Taking Up a 2020 Election Case
Lol. No. It's not.
Your Q arse has zero credibility. Start over with a new alter.
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:06 am to Texaggie96
quote:
Boared just keeps trolling you guys along and you just lap his shite up.
Well no, I was obviously excited thinking we were going to get an election fraud case in front of SCOTUS. It saddens me to now learn that they likely won't hear it. But you go ahead and frick off anyways ok, champ?
Posted on 11/16/22 at 9:06 am to BoarEd
quote:I cannot speak for others, but my downvote was simply to demonstrate utter contempt for your total lack of understanding of the court system.
I love how, so far, this thread has been visited by three communists who downvoted this. Yeah, it's just fricking terrible that a court is actually going to hear evidence of the stolen 2020 election, isn't it? frick you people.
IF the supreme court takes the case (unlikely), it does not “hear evidence.“ It will either affirm or reject the 10th circuit opinion on legal points. I suspect that it will affirm that opinion, 9-0.
This post was edited on 11/16/22 at 9:18 am
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News