- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This isn’t 2016 Trump…
Posted on 8/3/23 at 10:25 am to PorkSammich
Posted on 8/3/23 at 10:25 am to PorkSammich
He’s fumbled many interviews, but that was really bad.
But we aren’t supposed to notice or call it out.
But we aren’t supposed to notice or call it out.
0
Posted on 8/3/23 at 10:46 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:Is he? What did he say about the Smith J6 indictment? Not a rhetorical question. I apparently missed RDD's verbal decapitation of the SOB. If so, good for him! I'd like to hear it
He isn't? That's what you want to to go with?
Posted on 8/3/23 at 10:49 am to guy4lsu
quote:
Thats why Ron needs to wipe the floor with everyone else at the debate and do it convincingly.
I think a few of the candidates will open some eyes during the debates, people will realize it’s time to move on from the 77 yr old.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 10:51 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
J6 indictment
Well, you said DOJ.
So, which is it? Does he need to go after the DOJ, or is this just specifically about how you perceive his defense of Trump?
Posted on 8/3/23 at 10:59 am to guy4lsu
quote:
I'm a trump fan but that was really really bad
Yes it was.
I'm replying to more of the "gotcha" from liberals
Posted on 8/3/23 at 11:39 am to Flats
quote:
They just don't like the obvious implications.
Maga understands the implications of the indictments. It started in 2016 when Trump broke the fraud with the overwhelming support of MAGA. MAGA is not going away even though 2020 heist happened. The indictments now allow the 2020 heist and J6 to be exposed. LFG!
Posted on 8/3/23 at 11:42 am to TUman
quote:
The indictments now allow the 2020 heist and J6 to be exposed. LFG!
I can't wait for the meltdowns and conspiracies when it doesn't happen, ignoring clear reality like usual.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 11:45 am to SlowFlowPro
They won't let go of the dream.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 11:46 am to PorkSammich
When you have a bad record and can’t defend it.
That’s why he’s skipping the debates.
That’s why he’s skipping the debates.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 11:48 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
They won't let go of the dream.
why does Idiocracy have so many gifs that apply perfectly for Trumpkins and Qtards? It's shocking.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 11:48 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
ignoring clear reality like usual.
Your clear reality is to turn a blind eye to the frickery. Time will tell won’t it.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 11:50 am to TUman
quote:
Your clear reality is to turn a blind eye to the frickery.
No I have asked for legit evidence many times.
Trump is not going to be allowed to re-litigate 2020 during a criminal proceeding in the way his echo chamber and content creators are claiming. When the court correctly rules on these issues, there will be a major meltdown claiming corruption, partisanship, "Deep State" bullshite, etc.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 12:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Trump is not going to be allowed to re-litigate 2020 during a criminal proceeding in the way his echo chamber and content creators are claiming. When the court correctly rules on these issues, there will be a major meltdown claiming corruption, partisanship, "Deep State" bullshite, etc.
So, in an indictment that charges him with knowingly lying about election fraud and inciting violence, he won’t be able to present evidence that there was in fact election fraud?
With respect to the violence, he won’t be able to present evidence that the government had actors that encouraged the violence?
Posted on 8/3/23 at 12:30 pm to moneyg
quote:
So, in an indictment that charges him with knowingly lying about election fraud and inciting violence, he won’t be able to present evidence that there was in fact election fraud?
Almost assuredly not.
He will be allowed to present evidence of specifics he knew at the time, however, which wasn't much.
He will be allowed to present evidence of the legal arguments/theories he was relying on.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 12:50 pm to moneyg
quote:
quote:
Trump is not going to be allowed to re-litigate 2020 during a criminal proceeding in the way his echo chamber and content creators are claiming. When the court correctly rules on these issues, there will be a major meltdown claiming corruption, partisanship, "Deep State" bullshite, etc.
So, in an indictment that charges him with knowingly lying about election fraud and inciting violence, he won’t be able to present evidence that there was in fact election fraud?
With respect to the violence, he won’t be able to present evidence that the government had actors that encouraged the violence?
The reality is it really doesn't matter. The Dems have got Trump so bottled up in legal issues and mixed the complete garbage with a few things that actually have some legs between the 4 different cases that people don't care. I mean some people care of course but most people are just glazed over and want it all to go away.
Doesn't help that Trump can't clearly explain anything, it's just ALL CAPS posts that read like the ravings of a lunatic.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 1:11 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:The DOJ and Jack Smith. They are poisonous peas in a rotting pod. That was my reference.
Well, you said DOJ.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 1:13 pm to moneyg
quote:
So, in an indictment that charges him with knowingly lying about election fraud and inciting violence, he won’t be able to present evidence that there was in fact election fraud?
Correct. Of course not.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 1:16 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:Can you link his comments de-cleating Jack Smith relative to the J6 charges?
He has eviscerated the DOJ multiple times.
Again, I'm not arguing here. If RDD verbally gutted the son of a bitch after this week's BS, that would be fantastic. If not, he's playing for second place.
Posted on 8/3/23 at 1:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Not the standard, is it? The standard is reasonable doubt as to DJT's belief there was fraud.
Trump is not going to be allowed to re-litigate 2020
Posted on 8/3/23 at 1:21 pm to PorkSammich
Another ronbot circle jerk.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News