- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump orders release of Epstein documents
Posted on 7/18/25 at 7:28 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 7/18/25 at 7:28 am to SlowFlowPro
Oh you’re just talking about this silly board?
Never mind. Carry on.
Never mind. Carry on.
2
Posted on 7/18/25 at 7:31 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Oh you’re just talking about this silly board?
Twitter, Youtube, Patriots.win, etc.
All the MAGA outlets have had similar shares of outrage.
Posted on 7/18/25 at 7:48 am to cajuntiger1010
Awesome but why the frick didn’t he just do this from the get-go? 
Posted on 7/18/25 at 7:51 am to SlowFlowPro
I’m genuinely curious. How much digging have you done into Epstein? You constantly act like it’s the equivalent to Q
It doesn’t take a ton of research to find literal mountains of circumstantial evidence that tell you something funky is going on there. One or two pieces of circumstantial evidence, sure. But hundreds?
It doesn’t take a ton of research to find literal mountains of circumstantial evidence that tell you something funky is going on there. One or two pieces of circumstantial evidence, sure. But hundreds?
Posted on 7/18/25 at 7:53 am to PhillyTiger90
quote:
Awesome but why the frick didn’t he just do this from the get-go?
Because he isn’t releasing shite but he is giving his paid media backers an opportunity to spike the football and try to get everyone to move on.
My assumption is this will also blow up in his face
Posted on 7/18/25 at 7:57 am to theronswanson
quote:
Why limit it to grand jury testimony?? Why not release every single document?? What is there to hide.
See?
Posted on 7/18/25 at 7:57 am to cajuntiger1010
Calling it right now.
Panicans and and dems will not be satisfied, and accusations of hiding and destroying evidence will dominate this forum.
Panicans and and dems will not be satisfied, and accusations of hiding and destroying evidence will dominate this forum.
This post was edited on 7/18/25 at 7:58 am
Posted on 7/18/25 at 8:02 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Panicans and and dems will not be satisfied, and accusations of hiding and destroying evidence will dominate this forum.
They will try, but it will die quickly.
Posted on 7/18/25 at 8:03 am to loogaroo
Idk, man.
The obsession is out of this world
The obsession is out of this world
Posted on 7/18/25 at 8:04 am to cajuntiger1010
great. that means that all the names that needed to be edited have been successfully removed. release them now.
Posted on 7/18/25 at 8:08 am to davyjones
quote:
See the shortsighted and perilous assumption you’re making here is that there were all the absolutely necessary pieces required to bring a valid case against said “johns,”
It didn't seem so powerless to assume that of the party of "believe all women ". They forced Trump to pay millions of dollars to a woman whose evidence against him was simply her own testimony, and she could not even remember the year it happened.
This post was edited on 7/18/25 at 8:10 am
Posted on 7/18/25 at 8:30 am to cajuntiger1010
I knew he was just playing a part. Trying to get Dems to actually want the documents.
Posted on 7/18/25 at 8:44 am to AtlantaLSUfan
Why do people do this to themselves?
This is going to be a dud.
This is going to be a dud.
Posted on 7/18/25 at 8:52 am to cajuntiger1010
Likely the only untampered evidence left on Epstein. Unlikely that client names were used with the Grand Jury, though. Definitely more info on the scale of operations and detailed instances.
Posted on 7/18/25 at 8:57 am to cajuntiger1010
It's kind of smart because some folks will have their hands forced to file for injunctions blocking it. Not every single person will have culpability on this, but every one that files an injunction will have to explain themselves.
What happens when you turn on the lights?
What happens when you turn on the lights?
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:02 am to Ace Midnight
A judge also has to approve release of grand jury testimony.
It’s not something that can just happen.
It’s smart because the judge can just say “no” and Trump can wave it around like he tried.
It’s not something that can just happen.
It’s smart because the judge can just say “no” and Trump can wave it around like he tried.
This post was edited on 7/18/25 at 9:03 am
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:06 am to Ace Midnight
I predict that once again nothing happens
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:08 am to cajuntiger1010
Well I guess the 'idiots' weren't so dumb after all!
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:13 am to msutiger
quote:
I’m genuinely curious. How much digging have you done into Epstein?
Clearly more than most because I can answer questions like "Why is Maxwell In prison? Who did she traffic victims to?"
quote:
One or two pieces of circumstantial evidence, sure. But hundreds?
There is just as much that deflates the CTs
The 2 biggest issues with the major CTs are
1. Where are all the victims? The fact that several ha e participated in civil and criminal litigations show many related only to Epstein exist. Where are the hundreds/thousands of victims associated with the rest? Clearly "They" weren't killing these victims.
2. Why did Maxwell permit her prosecution and conviction? If this blackmail is so powerful it fricked Trump (and 4 other admins at least), how was it so weak she was unable to avoid a multi-decade sentence?
These cannot be explained within the CTs without creating new layers to the CT, which is damning
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:14 am to PhillyTiger90
quote:
Awesome but why the frick didn’t he just do this from the get-go?
I have said it over and over and gotten roasted....the dumb arse dems had to call for it, so it didn't look like political retrobution on his part....they fell for it hook, line and sinker..I knew it the minute Nancy Pelosi agreed with Trump, that it should go away..She knew what he was doing and wanted the dems to shut up before he said you want it....? well, here ya go......
Page 12 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News