- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/9/23 at 1:58 pm to teke184
Orange man bad is the only thing that matters to a ny jury.
Posted on 5/9/23 at 1:58 pm to VoxDawg
The Chappelle Show’s bit on the R Kelly tape seems appropriate here.
“I won’t believe that tape without each of the girls holding up two forms of ID and Kelly’s grandmother present to identify him.”
“I won’t believe that tape without each of the girls holding up two forms of ID and Kelly’s grandmother present to identify him.”
Posted on 5/9/23 at 1:58 pm to Lakeboy7
quote:
But unlike you I have a good bit of jury experience.
I have a decent amount. It would be pretty unusual for a civil jury to come back with a really large monetary verdict that quickly.
Posted on 5/9/23 at 1:59 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Rape and taking a pee pee on a hookers buttocks.
Both of which will ultimately be revealed were actually Hunter Biden.
To be fair, the rape part is his daddy Joe with his sister
Posted on 5/9/23 at 1:59 pm to Fun Bunch
Someone give me the quick rundown of this case. Did this broad claim Trump raped her 30 years ago?
Posted on 5/9/23 at 2:00 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
I have a decent amount. It would be pretty unusual for a civil jury to come back with a really large monetary verdict that quickly.
You are correct. Lakeboy has no idea what he's talking about.
ETA, to be clear, I'm not trying to suggest what THIS jury may be doing here.
Just speaking on experience and knowledge.
This post was edited on 5/9/23 at 2:01 pm
Posted on 5/9/23 at 2:00 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Not usually in a civil case when awarding large damages.
Its in a jurisdiction where you have to plead a dollar amount right?
Posted on 5/9/23 at 2:01 pm to auggie
If all it takes is a women telling a story about something that allegedly happened 20+ years ago with no other evidence such as a witness, video tape, police report soon after it occurred, etc… to render a man liable to pay monetary damages, then no man is safe in NY and all men should leave the state.
Posted on 5/9/23 at 2:02 pm to Fun Bunch
Lol. Wouldn't surprise me if the only question the jury asked was "what's trump worth?" and then just all agreed to use that number as the judgement.
Sadly, I'm only like 40% joking. I've genuinely no faith in juries from big blue areas.
Sadly, I'm only like 40% joking. I've genuinely no faith in juries from big blue areas.
Posted on 5/9/23 at 2:04 pm to Jon Ham
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/11/23 at 5:29 pm
Posted on 5/9/23 at 2:04 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
It would be pretty unusual for a civil jury to come back with a really large monetary verdict that quickly.
I've seen it, but only when the jury was pissed off.
Posted on 5/9/23 at 2:05 pm to TCO
quote:
no one can prove that Trump didn’t commit this crime.
Do they have to?
Posted on 5/9/23 at 2:05 pm to Jon Ham
No other reason to be in the state anyway.
Blind David Paterson changed the NY state tax laws years ago to where you count as a resident for tax purposes if you spend more than X days in the state within a calendar year.
Unless you have a definite need to be physically present in the state, I would avoid it like the fricking plague if I didn’t want to be considered a “resident” of multiple states simultaneously.
Blind David Paterson changed the NY state tax laws years ago to where you count as a resident for tax purposes if you spend more than X days in the state within a calendar year.
Unless you have a definite need to be physically present in the state, I would avoid it like the fricking plague if I didn’t want to be considered a “resident” of multiple states simultaneously.
Posted on 5/9/23 at 2:05 pm to Lakeboy7
You can plead whatever dollar amount you want but my understanding is the jury can still decide on any amount they want to give.
They have to decide first on liability aka is this person civilly liable which would generally take time.
Then they would decide on damages, aka amounts, and there is usual several elements of damages to award.
That USUALLY takes time.
However, all juries are different. They could have walked in and said "Guilty", give her whatever she wants.
That isn't the norm though
They have to decide first on liability aka is this person civilly liable which would generally take time.
Then they would decide on damages, aka amounts, and there is usual several elements of damages to award.
That USUALLY takes time.
However, all juries are different. They could have walked in and said "Guilty", give her whatever she wants.
That isn't the norm though
Posted on 5/9/23 at 2:05 pm to Lakeboy7
quote:
Not really. But unlike you I have a good bit of jury experience.
Of course you are, every single possible anti-Trump tidbit causes your knee to jerk into convulsions.
Civil suits don't "prove" jack shite but I am sure you and others will jump at the opportunity to call Trump a "rapist".
Posted on 5/9/23 at 2:05 pm to teke184
quote:
The Chappelle Show’s bit on the R Kelly tape seems appropriate here.
Did Trump plead the Fif?
Posted on 5/9/23 at 2:06 pm to TDTOM
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/11/23 at 5:29 pm
Posted on 5/9/23 at 2:06 pm to teke184
So their plan is to make Trump come to court enough in NY so they can get his tax money.
Posted on 5/9/23 at 2:06 pm to TDTOM
In a criminal court, there should be no way to convict based solely on a lack of evidence. The bedrock of our court system is “innocent until proven guilty” and not vice versa.
In a civil court? More leeway but a total lack of evidence toward that verdict means an extremely high chance of being tossed on appeal.
In a civil court? More leeway but a total lack of evidence toward that verdict means an extremely high chance of being tossed on appeal.
Page 2 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News