- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/28/25 at 11:20 am to SirWinston
quote:
Thats fine. I think we should still listen to voices like his as they represent a large percentage of young right-leaning kids today
Poor kids will grow up incels or gay, following that twat.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 11:22 am to Boodis Man
My thoughts on the interview:
It didnt show off Nick's intellect or sense of humour to the extent that I would have liked. Favourite part was NJF retelling the story of he and Ye at Mar a Lago.
I thought Tucker was still kind of insinuating that he thinks Nick might be a fed at various points towards the end
C- overall. Nicks show is usually more interesting and funny (especially his Superchats at the end of his programmes) than this interview was.
It didnt show off Nick's intellect or sense of humour to the extent that I would have liked. Favourite part was NJF retelling the story of he and Ye at Mar a Lago.
I thought Tucker was still kind of insinuating that he thinks Nick might be a fed at various points towards the end
C- overall. Nicks show is usually more interesting and funny (especially his Superchats at the end of his programmes) than this interview was.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 11:31 am to SirWinston
quote:
I thought Tucker was still kind of insinuating that he thinks Nick might be a fed at various points towards the end
And I think Fuentes is still skeptical of Tucker (who I like) due to his family having CIA ties.
Ideologically Fuentes takes a reasonable conclusion and then extrapolates based on that to a conclusion that is well beyond reasonable. Even worse I think he intentionally uses words like "Jewry" that paint his legitimate questions in a poor light and that's why Tucker is so skeptical of him.
Asking why AIPAC doesn't have to register under FARA is a really good question.
Following that up by saying that all jews answer to Israel first and foremost and that they should be collectively viewed as different than anyone else is actual antisemitism.
But I think he believes that we're entering a period where the younger generation isnt going to give a F about offending people as their culture and nation is crashing down around them and he wants to be the voice for that.
This post was edited on 10/28/25 at 11:55 am
Posted on 10/28/25 at 11:33 am to RobbBobb
quote:
There is no middle ground there. You either support the genocide seeking Muslims, or the constantly warring Israelis
There is totally a middle ground. It is naive, even genocidal, to think differently.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 11:41 am to tide06
quote:
Even worst I think he intentionally uses words like "Jewry" that paint his legitimate questions in a poor light and thats why Tucker is so skeptical of him.
I listen to Professor Jeffery Sachs a lot and he uses that term all the time. It seems to get high usage in academic circles.
This post was edited on 10/28/25 at 11:44 am
Posted on 10/28/25 at 11:52 am to DCTiger
quote:
THIS!! And I can 100% assure the collection of morons who believe in or what Fuentes has to say know absolutely nothing about politics or the dark money associated with it. However, I do…my nom de plume says it all. Long time politcial veteran, seen it all.
“Nick Fuentes IS a moron…”
Like many “influencers”, he’s bought and paid for. 90+% are. It’s propaganda at its finest echoed by social media. The amount of research on propaganda is long and extensive spanning decades. Once you see it and understand why it’s there, you will awaken mentally. Like UAPs…once you see it, you can’t unsee it.
I would like to hear more about this.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 11:53 am to GumboPot
quote:
I listen to Professor Jeffery Sachs
CCP paid shill
Posted on 10/28/25 at 11:55 am to tide06
quote:
And I think Fuentes is still skeptical of Tucker (who I like) due to his family having CIA ties.
Ideologically Fuentes takes a reasonable conclusion and then extrapolates based on that to a conclusion that is well beyond reasonable. Even worst I think he intentionally uses words like "Jewry" that paint his legitimate questions in a poor light and thats why Tucker is so skeptical of him.
Asking why AIPAC doesn't have to register under FARA is a really good question.
Following that up by saying that all jews answer to Israel first and foremost and that they should be collectively viewed as different than anyone else is actual antisemitism.
But I think he believes that we're entering a period where the younger generation isnt going to give a F about offending people as their culture and nation is crashing down around them and he wants to be the voice for that.
Fair takes.
I would recommend Nick's recent conversation with Gavin McInnes in regards to the "new right" and Israel. It was way funnier and more interesting than this one with Tucker.
Gavin was pro-Israel and Nick is obviously not. Better convo and I thought Gavin more than held his own.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 11:55 am to tide06
quote:
Is the very act of questioning an alliance with a nation racist?
This is always the defense of Tucker, "he's just asking questions". Dinesh D'Souza describes him well here. (skip to 13:00)
quote:
Tucker doesn't even purport to be knowledgeable about anything. As a result, what Tucker says is "I will develop a ventriloquist style. I have strong opinions but I don't want to defend any of them. So I will setup a structure in which I bring in sources, often rather dubious sources...what I will do is ask leading questions that in which is embedded an answer, my answer, but framed as a question. You then will blurt out the obvious implications of the questions giving me the answer I expected..."
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 11:57 am to GumboPot
quote:
I listen to Professor Jeffery Sachs a lot and he uses that term all the time. It seems to get high usage in academic circles.
Very interesting, I plead ignorance on it as I've only heard it used in context to WW2 era Nazi ideology and radicals on 4chan using it in a very derogatory way.
Just like so many other terms I have no idea why they're considered offensive but we're all expected to accept that it somehow is and that the use of it in a modern context is considered an attempt to convey a negative light on a group.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 11:59 am to jlnoles79
quote:
CCP paid shill
Everybody is paid by somebody.
Daily Wire, Dave Rubin, Babylon Bee all get tons of money from Israel interests. The info we have about Charlie Kirk and his donors proves this.
Tucker Nick Candace, Tate bros and others likely get money from the Middle East
Doesn't mean that any of their opinions are right or wrong based on where their sponsorships come from.
This post was edited on 10/28/25 at 12:01 pm
Posted on 10/28/25 at 12:00 pm to Scumbag from NewYork
First time I've ever heard an in-depth interview with Fuentes, honestly don't know much about him at all.
After listening to about 3/4 of the podcast the one thing I can say is Fuentes isn't happy that certain ethnicities and ethno-religious groups can unashamedly promote their views and beliefs with little to no blowback from many so called "conservatives."
Fuentes brings up a good argument against the intolerance by many Americans of white Christian Nationalism in America. Fuentes astutely describes how every ethnicity and ethno-religious group can pull together in clannish societal groups but the same behavior is viewed as racist and a threat to society if white Christians who promote the America First/MAGA agenda do the same.
The other obvious issue Fuentes has is the tentacles of political influence that exist between many in the DC Uniparty and Israel. Fuentes also decries the fact many Jews in the US (and around the world) have an Israel First belief and loyalty to Israel vs an America First belief, in many ways I understand Fuentes concerns. I do believe there are times to support Israel when they are being unfairly attacked and harassed, however, I don't believe the US should show blind loyalty to support Israel in every circumstance because I don't believe Israel is infallible and always without fault when armed skirmishes occur.
After listening to about 3/4 of the podcast the one thing I can say is Fuentes isn't happy that certain ethnicities and ethno-religious groups can unashamedly promote their views and beliefs with little to no blowback from many so called "conservatives."
Fuentes brings up a good argument against the intolerance by many Americans of white Christian Nationalism in America. Fuentes astutely describes how every ethnicity and ethno-religious group can pull together in clannish societal groups but the same behavior is viewed as racist and a threat to society if white Christians who promote the America First/MAGA agenda do the same.
The other obvious issue Fuentes has is the tentacles of political influence that exist between many in the DC Uniparty and Israel. Fuentes also decries the fact many Jews in the US (and around the world) have an Israel First belief and loyalty to Israel vs an America First belief, in many ways I understand Fuentes concerns. I do believe there are times to support Israel when they are being unfairly attacked and harassed, however, I don't believe the US should show blind loyalty to support Israel in every circumstance because I don't believe Israel is infallible and always without fault when armed skirmishes occur.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 12:00 pm to SirWinston
quote:
Everybody is paid by somebody.
Some of you America First frauds really seem to like people who speak glowingly about foreign adversaries
Posted on 10/28/25 at 12:03 pm to jlnoles79
Why is Qatar more of an "adversary" to America than Israel is? Genuine question.
Qatar props up Trump, works with him for peace in the ME, showed great restraint when Israel literally BOMBED their country recently, doesn't historically sell our intelligence and technologies to China, doesnt honeypot our politicians and billionaires, etc.
Qatar props up Trump, works with him for peace in the ME, showed great restraint when Israel literally BOMBED their country recently, doesn't historically sell our intelligence and technologies to China, doesnt honeypot our politicians and billionaires, etc.
This post was edited on 10/28/25 at 12:06 pm
Posted on 10/28/25 at 12:04 pm to jlnoles79
quote:
Some of you America First frauds really seem to like people who speak glowingly about foreign adversaries
Fuentes is worse than Candace. He's simply choosing his positions to excite the retards.
I cant imagine how any man would be attracted to this incels message.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 12:07 pm to JoeHackett
quote:
This is always the defense of Tucker, "he's just asking questions". Dinesh D'Souza describes him well here. (skip to 13:00)
And this is the same deflection I hear his critics make when asked what he's done that's anti-Semitic.
The only criticisms I've ever heard him make are specific to the Israeli government / Bibi, not the Jewish religion or people, and specifically that they're overly influential via AIPAC and that its ridiculous that AIPAC doesn't have to even register with FARA.
So again, how is Tucker anti-Semitic? You want to make the claim that he is either support it with evidence or withdraw the statement.
To make a vague reference to D'Souza just sounds like you don't know why you have that opinion but feel obligated to repeat it because its the accepted viewpoint among those on the right you follow.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 12:09 pm to SirWinston
quote:
Why is Qatar more of an "adversary" to America than Israel is? Genuine question.
You absolute fricktard. You assholes belong in the streets marching with the Bernie Bros and Globalize the Intifada crowd
Posted on 10/28/25 at 12:14 pm to tide06
quote:
and that its ridiculous that AIPAC doesn't have to even register with FARA.
What do the letters in AIPAC stand for? What do the letters in FARA stand for?
quote:
To make a vague reference to D'Souza
I didn't make a "vague reference". I'm not sure what you're talking about. I quoted him directly explaining his position on Tucker's style of "asking questions".
quote:
among those on the right you follow.
I don't "follow" people on the right.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 12:17 pm to jlnoles79
quote:
You absolute fricktard. You assholes belong in the streets marching with the Bernie Bros and Globalize the Intifada crowd
Why dont you address my points instead of just hurling pejoratives at me?
Has Qatar honeypotted our politicians and business magnates? Has Qatar sold our technologies to our enemies?
This post was edited on 10/28/25 at 12:18 pm
Page 6 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News