- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 12/26/25 at 3:48 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
We did a lot of stupid shite back then, including jailing journalists over the war.
The text of the law remains however. And that text was construed to include gang violence an insurrection. You may not like it but the legal precedent is clear. All the lying and obfuscation doesn’t change the facts. Facts you were ignorant existed.
I tried to tell you earlier today. Do more research and less bloviating. Your inane prattling makes you look like an idiot. This post was edited on 12/26/25 at 3:54 pm
Posted on 12/26/25 at 3:52 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Riot and looting related, in the modern age, Goober.
Roger, Can you link me to this quote? You put it in as a quote, but I don’t recall you saying anything about the modern age in this thread. I think you’re trying to mislead and move the goalposts. As you tend to do.
And if we are limited to modern age why are we discussing the act at all? It was created in the 1800s
This post was edited on 12/26/25 at 3:54 pm
Posted on 12/26/25 at 4:01 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Keep hiding behind skirts, terrified Millennial.
Ok tough "guy"..
Posted on 12/26/25 at 5:11 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
It’s all well and good until the other side exercises those same powers.
What's the left going to do? Send the Marines to low crime areas and force the population to commit violent crime?
Posted on 12/26/25 at 5:16 pm to BBONDS25
Posted on 12/26/25 at 5:32 pm to CapnKangaroo
Large military presence?
What does that mean?
What does that mean?
Posted on 12/26/25 at 5:44 pm to RogerTheShrubber
missed that post. Apologies. Posted on 12/26/25 at 5:47 pm to BBONDS25
It was vague enough to where I could claim victory over a broad range of time. Sometimes a little bullshite can be pretty effective.
Posted on 12/26/25 at 6:16 pm to Bunk Moreland
I would prefer for the ultimate shift towards a Christian ruled America to be done by peaceful means and not at the business end of a gun.
I voted for Trump knowing he is not a Godly man, but he is the SOB we need to break the back of the corrupt deep state autocracy we have lived under for years.
I hope the bloodshed is minimal, but I am not hopeful.
I voted for Trump knowing he is not a Godly man, but he is the SOB we need to break the back of the corrupt deep state autocracy we have lived under for years.
I hope the bloodshed is minimal, but I am not hopeful.
Posted on 12/26/25 at 6:34 pm to BrodyDad
fricking 65 posts are the rest this idiotic?
Alter
Alter
Posted on 12/26/25 at 6:47 pm to Jbird
Jbird, tell us more about your kinder, gentler vision of military occupation of major U.S. cities.
Posted on 12/26/25 at 6:50 pm to Bunk Moreland
Occupation like your war scenario?
fricking amazing never go full 4dummies.
fricking amazing never go full 4dummies.
Posted on 12/26/25 at 6:53 pm to BrodyDad
“ALL things happen for the good of them that love God”, BD. Eternity and ‘Heaven’ will be sufficient to wipe clean any remembrance of the pain it required to get us there.
Merry Christmas Brother.
Merry Christmas Brother.
Posted on 12/26/25 at 6:55 pm to Bunk Moreland
Only extremist imaginations foresee anything that reasonable and rational people would deem “occupation.” Have you or any of the others similarly situated bothered or thought to research/consider past situations of similar federal intervention, and the circumstances surrounding them? To perhaps determine whether it’s the extraordinary and unprecedented scenario that you all seem to think it would be (hypothetically speaking)?
Posted on 12/26/25 at 6:58 pm to davyjones
Naw Bunk is still too busy trying to circumvent the checkpoints to get into the occupied territories.
This post was edited on 12/26/25 at 6:59 pm
Posted on 12/26/25 at 6:59 pm to davyjones
I think we should use the military to permanently police U.S. cities/citizens. Seems healthy. Dems would be benevolent with that power.
Posted on 12/26/25 at 7:00 pm to Bunk Moreland
“Permanently”
Posted on 12/26/25 at 7:00 pm to Bunk Moreland
Well those checkpoints weren't cheap!
Posted on 12/26/25 at 7:01 pm to Bunk Moreland
Whats the issue with keep the cities safe?
What could.Dems do with that power?
Do you hear yourself lately. You are fighting for crime
What could.Dems do with that power?
Do you hear yourself lately. You are fighting for crime
Page 22 of 24
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News