- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Vitamin D, Ivermectin, Vaccine...great information
Posted on 3/31/21 at 7:48 am to AmosMosesAndTwins
Posted on 3/31/21 at 7:48 am to AmosMosesAndTwins
quote:
So just like Pfizer and Moderna?
I hope this is sarcasm.
0
Posted on 3/31/21 at 8:12 am to AMS
The fact that they tell you to wear a mask (or two) and social distance after you've had the vaccine makes me think they don't know what they've created. They created that optic not me. They fear mongered themselves to those paying attention. They should have said take the vaccine and be free but they didn't.
And Islandbuckeye, I realize that chatting in a forum isn't the best way to have a back and forth conversation because you cannot know the emotion behind my response but I wasnt trying to argue. Read it like a request I guess. More like I understood his point about the cdc but not your point about the bio stuff.
And Islandbuckeye, I realize that chatting in a forum isn't the best way to have a back and forth conversation because you cannot know the emotion behind my response but I wasnt trying to argue. Read it like a request I guess. More like I understood his point about the cdc but not your point about the bio stuff.
Posted on 3/31/21 at 8:17 am to Mizooag94
quote:
Your vaccines will be useless in a year if not less
The doctors and pharmacists I’ve talked to off the record think it will be much less. Which gives me another reason to not take any of the current “vaccines”.
Posted on 3/31/21 at 8:17 am to Statestreet
So let me make sure I have all this right.
Things we trust government on:
1) Vaccine side effect numbers
2) Vaccine death numbers
3) Need for Stimulus
Things we don't trust government on:
1) COVID case count
2) COVID death count
3) COVID origin
4) Mask efficacy
Am I on the right track?
Things we trust government on:
1) Vaccine side effect numbers
2) Vaccine death numbers
3) Need for Stimulus
Things we don't trust government on:
1) COVID case count
2) COVID death count
3) COVID origin
4) Mask efficacy
Am I on the right track?
Posted on 3/31/21 at 8:19 am to Herooftheday
quote:
I wasnt trying to argue. Read it like a request I guess.
Understood and apologize if my post was read as adversarial. I am just tired of being stuck between both sides. I have administrators/USVI DOH and fear mongering from both sides.
When I was supporting HCQ in our hospital, we obtained a supply of HCQ. Then our DOH (run by a nurse with an MBA) issued a statement denying its use. When I argued this up my chain of command, I literally received a laugh with the comment: of course it is political. I was and remain pissed off about it. Like I said I just want politics OUT of science/medicine.
Posted on 3/31/21 at 8:21 am to jp4lsu
I took Ivermectin the day I tested positive. And had been taking C, D, and zinc prior. Very mild case. Doesn't prove anything but doesn't disprove either.
Posted on 3/31/21 at 8:21 am to Mizooag94
quote:
Your vaccines will be useless in a year if not less...
So it will be like the flu shot.
Posted on 3/31/21 at 8:21 am to jp4lsu
When I worm my cows, I dab a little on my tongue. I have never gotten the COVID or stomach worms
Posted on 3/31/21 at 8:23 am to ImaObserver
quote:
It's been in common use elsewhere with great success and it is not known to give adverse side effects.
Small sample size, but myself, my father and my uncle all took two small doses when we all had Covid. The next day we were almost back to normal. My mother had it at the same time and refused to take it and dealt with it for about 2 weeks before she got better.
My dad took it on the advice of his doctor and then we followed suit. Could be a coincidence, but it can't hurt if you just take two small doses and stop at that.
Posted on 3/31/21 at 8:49 am to MikeBRLA
quote:
The doctors and pharmacists I’ve talked to off the record think it will be much less.
There are actual virologists and biochemists out there that think it could provide 2-3 years of effective protection.
The bottom line is nobody knows yet.
Posted on 3/31/21 at 8:59 am to LSU316
quote:
There are actual virologists and biochemists out there that think it could provide 2-3 years of effective protection.
I highlighted the key word for you. Which also means it could NOT provide 2-3 years of protection. Hell, there are already reports of “vaccinated” people getting COVID-19.
Posted on 3/31/21 at 9:06 am to MikeBRLA
quote:
Hell, there are already reports of “vaccinated” people getting COVID-19.
So I've seen very few...single digits...the vaccines are 95% effective and on a real world study of medical providers held up to that rate. So yea some very few unlucky people will get it but it should be very minor illness.
quote:
Which also means it could NOT provide 2-3 years of protection.
I see you didn't get to the part where I said that "Nobody knows."....my point is to say that you think the protection is 1 year or less is disingenuous without admitting that it could be a lot more.
This post was edited on 3/31/21 at 9:08 am
Posted on 3/31/21 at 9:11 am to jp4lsu
Thanks for posting. My internal medicine guy told me the same thing for my yearly except the Ivermectin part. He was big on Vitamin D and Zinc and not big on masks. I've been taking those and only masking when the business required it.
Posted on 3/31/21 at 9:38 am to AMS
quote:
youre wasting your breath espousing basic medical data interpretation skills. when propaganda and click bait articles that say otherwise. many of these folks are unreasonably terrified of the vaccine but think covid is literally nothing. its ironic in both a sad and funny way.
How could anyone be questioning what they have heard this past year and be a bit skeptical to scared.
April 2020 - Fauci - don't wear masks there is not need.
June 2020 - Fauci - you must wear a mask, you are spreading the virus.
April 2020 - Fauci - the earliest the US could possibly get a vaccine would be in 12 or even 18 months — "at least. Anything less would be reckless.
December 2020 - Fauci - The speed is really a reflection of the scientific advances that have allowed us to do things in a matter of months that would have formerly taken years. And that's the reason why we have a vaccine now in less than one year from the time the virus was identified. That isn't reckless speed; that's sufficient speed based on scientific advances.
August 2020 - Fauci - U.S. could "be as good [as] back to normal as we possibly can" by early 2021 if a coronavirus vaccine becomes widely available.
February 2021 - Fauci - Americans who have received the vaccine still must wear a mask.
Posted on 3/31/21 at 9:55 am to BayouBengal51
What was the dosage I have it for treating my dogs for heart worms
Posted on 3/31/21 at 10:39 am to ole man
quote:
What was the dosage I have it for treating my dogs for heart worms
Curious about this as well. One study I read said 12mg daily for a week after testing positive.
Posted on 3/31/21 at 11:22 am to IslandBuckeye
quote:
The point I was making to him was presenting adverse reactions to vaccines without providing the number of those vaccinated with no adverse reactions is fear mongoring.
I see your point, but my point was that there are reported (and many verified) adverse reactions to the Covid Vaccine. No fear mongering intended, just pointing out that fact. I supplied a link with the searchable data bank.
Posted on 3/31/21 at 11:48 am to ole man
I have a Ivermectin paste for horses and it has markers on it showing how much to take by weight. The Dr in the video said there is no risk in taking a lot more than is on label.
I feel now that this vaccine will be like the flu vaccine, meaning it will be needed each year. I think this was an opportunity for mass human testing of their new toy (mRNA) method. This method has never been done and there are studies in animals that have been unsuccessful.
I feel now that this vaccine will be like the flu vaccine, meaning it will be needed each year. I think this was an opportunity for mass human testing of their new toy (mRNA) method. This method has never been done and there are studies in animals that have been unsuccessful.
Posted on 3/31/21 at 11:53 am to jp4lsu
I didn't know this till earlier this week, and this Dr in the video mentioned it.
The number of deaths in years past are the same as they are in 2020. Very interesting. I dare say the same percentages at each age group is the same.
The number of deaths in years past are the same as they are in 2020. Very interesting. I dare say the same percentages at each age group is the same.
Posted on 3/31/21 at 12:13 pm to Aubie Spr96
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News