- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: WEF: “we can induce meat allergy by using ticks to stop the consumption of meat”
Posted on 2/8/26 at 10:17 am to SallysHuman
Posted on 2/8/26 at 10:17 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Or rogue scientist activists.
I already covered the 12 Monkeys scenario
0
Posted on 2/8/26 at 10:17 am to TigerDoc
The left has no control over its fringe. It’s a key difference from the political right. Everything moves left.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 10:21 am to Sid E Walker
quote:
I caught this about 12 years ago and didn’t even know that I had been bitten. High fever, pounding headaches, joint pain. Still suffer the effects of it, nasty shite.
I have a family member that was suffering. Many idiot doctors were consulted. The topic was discussed on this board.
I recommended the Lyme test based on the board discussion. It got diagnosed and treated but they do have lingering effects. Best of luck.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 10:21 am to TigerDoc
quote:
Liao is a philosopher who specializes in extreme thought experiments about climate ethics.
It's "extreme thought experiments" alright -- as in, openly declaring war on all human life via an anti-ethical, immoral evil agenda.
And btw, to characterize this evil PO as a so-called "philosopher" is to ridicule its definition AND those with sane sensibilities.
quote:
The interesting question isn’t whether the idea is gross (it is) but what the actual pathway from a paper or a panel to real-world coercion would be.
Courts, regulators, medical ethics boards, and public backlash would all light up immediately.
Since when?
What happened during the never-"proven" Covid pandemic AND subsequent widely mandatory injections of a never-tested "vaxxine"? Whistle-blower doctors and researchers were censored, ostracized, lost licenses. The "public backlash"? Ignored, gaslit and quashed via internet censorship and institutional Media-Blitz.
Your perspective is an interesting rationale to a sanctioned speaker at the WEF; Naivete and wishful thinking to the max. Liao was not a "guest speaker" out of the blue. He speaks for the WEF's agenda and eventual implementations thereof.
The Davos-WEF machination comprises and represents the world's collective banking, corporate, and governmental leadership. A virtual cabal, they control ALL national and international communications, "health care", economics, monetary systems and social policies.
quote:
What's interesting is how fast creepy hypotheticals turn into a monolithic "they want to do this to us" stories.
So in other words, "More paranoia" and "CT" a la SFP? "Nothing to see here"?? You two rogue naifs need to be sent to the Principal's office.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 10:24 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What is the full context?
All you do is stir shite up. It doesn't matter the board or post. It's insufferable
Posted on 2/8/26 at 10:26 am to EphesianArmor
Covid was a watershed moment of institutional distrust. In spite of our left wing apologists, anyone with eyes should rightfully be very concerned when ideas like this are entertained on such a stage.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 10:28 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Funny no one ever asks this in relation to Trump.
What is the full context?
Posted on 2/8/26 at 10:30 am to Fun Bunch
If someone were to actually try that, on a population, they'd end up dead. You're writing your death sentence.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 10:33 am to Oates Mustache
quote:
If someone were to actually try that, on a population, they'd end up dead. You're writing your death sentence.
Not really... they will blame it on climate change, ecosystem disturbances, etc... that's the beauty of it, be it a tick or a virus- they claim it an act of an angry Gaia.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 10:35 am to Oates Mustache
More shocking than the proposal itself is the fact that it was allowed on such a stage, and how quickly leftists came here to do damage control rather than join civil society in marginalizing tf out of this clown.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 10:36 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
and how quickly leftists came here to do damage control
Who has supported this idea in any way?
Posted on 2/8/26 at 10:36 am to Fun Bunch
Published in Bioethics last year. Different authors than this guy but the same idea.
LINK
LINK
quote:
The bite of the lone star tick spreads alpha-gal syndrome (AGS), a condition whose only effect is the creation of a severe but nonfatal red meat allergy. Public health departments warn against lone star ticks and AGS, and scientists are working to develop an inoculation to AGS. Herein, we argue that if eating meat is morally impermissible, then efforts to prevent the spread of tickborne AGS are also morally impermissible. After explaining the symptoms of AGS and how they are transmitted via ticks, we argue that tickborne AGS is a moral bioenhancer if and when it motivates people to stop eating meat. We then defend what we call the Convergence Argument: If x-ing prevents the world from becoming a significantly worse place, doesn't violate anyone's rights, and promotes virtuous action or character, then x-ing is strongly pro tanto obligatory; promoting tickborne AGS satisfies each of these conditions. Therefore, promoting tickborne AGS is strongly pro tanto obligatory. It is presently feasible to genetically edit the disease-carrying capacity of ticks. If this practice can be applied to ticks carrying AGS, then promoting the proliferation of tickborne AGS is morally obligatory.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 10:49 am to SlowFlowPro
You’re so contrarian that you defend the WEF.
A group of elites that want to change the world, including finishing the power of the country you live in.
You dismiss them as a “think tank”, not knowing shite about the WEF.
You do it to get you “actually” meme in so you feel better. Which makes you look retarded.
A group of elites that want to change the world, including finishing the power of the country you live in.
You dismiss them as a “think tank”, not knowing shite about the WEF.
You do it to get you “actually” meme in so you feel better. Which makes you look retarded.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 10:54 am to thermal9221
quote:
You’re so contrarian that you defend the WEF.
Not really, but many people here clearly don't know what the WEF actually is.
quote:
A group of elites that want to change the world, including finishing the power of the country you live in.
Like I said...
Posted on 2/8/26 at 10:55 am to Fun Bunch
Helicopter rides for everyone who says stuff like this would solve the problem.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 10:57 am to Earnest_P
quote:
Helicopter rides for everyone who says stuff like this would solve the problem.
Yeah, people advocating for bio-terrorism should be summarily dealt with in the harshest methods available. There should be no backpedaling allowed for his kind of rhetoric.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 10:57 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
People who are ignorant of the WEF but believe irrational projections would say something like this.
People who understand what the WEF actually is
The former are statists who are brainwashed beyond imagination.
Most people already know what the WEF is, as told BY Klaus Schwab and the WEF itself.
Aside from WEF-advocated mad scientists like Dr. Liao and his evil Tick-Meat engineering and Mind-Erasure schemes, here's what their dystopian goals for mankind. For you, which ones are "reasonable" or "beneficial"?
#1 "Penetrating" Governments with puppets reps
#2 Controlling Minds Using Sound Waves
#3 Pills That Contain Microchips
#4 Directing and advocating Massive Lockdowns (for "emergencies")
#5 Plans for implementing AI digital detection and ID applied by laser, EMF, and grid control -- to be made mandatory for all humans (like tracking livestock inventory)
#6 The Great Reset
#7 Recalibration (i.e. restrictions) of free speech
#8 Digital passports and cellphones the gauge movement & communication (within your clothing OR physical body)
#9 World serfs and slaves (who survive the WEF-NWO sabotage of health) "will own nothing and be happy"
#10 Control over all water, land, sunlight, diet, and ownership of all living creatures -- and especially independent and sovereign mankind
Posted on 2/8/26 at 11:01 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Not really, but many people here clearly don't know what the WEF actually is.
What do YOU think it is?
I buy their books, read their website and watch their YouTube… I feel comfortable at taking them at their word.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 11:03 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Covid was a watershed moment of institutional distrust.
Forevermore. (Not that they care -- they feel they hold all the cards of control at this point)
quote:
anyone with eyes should rightfully be very concerned when ideas like this are entertained on such a stage.
Absolutely. (The willing ignorant and blind are a massive problem)
Somehow, even when it's in our face, the tyranny only registers with about 10%. Moreover, ZERO governments (including our own) reassure us that they will push back against any of these threats of vandalism against our person, health and sovereignty.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 11:06 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Because it's insane and people like to eat meat.
I’m sure people in Germany would like affordable heat in the winter, yet that didn’t stop the Gordon shutting down every coal plant in the country. And why did they do that? Because they listen to whack jobs like this guy at the WEF.
You are missing the point. It doesn’t matter that “the people” like to eat meat. What matters is that governments don’t care what the people want, only their own agendas. And if they think something crazy like this meets that agenda, then who know.
Page 6 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News