Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Yesterday, FORTY-FOUR Senate democrats voted for human euthanasia | Page 3 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Yesterday, FORTY-FOUR Senate democrats voted for human euthanasia

Posted on 2/26/19 at 12:02 pm to
Posted by mightyMick
Member since Aug 2018
3067 posts
Posted on 2/26/19 at 12:02 pm to
These dimprogs are soulless.
Posted by da prophet
hammond, la
Member since Sep 2013
2984 posts
Posted on 2/26/19 at 12:03 pm to
And Trump is supposed to be Hitler? Dems voting to kill babies. This is scary stuff.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
117150 posts
Posted on 2/26/19 at 12:04 pm to
OK, I read the bill. It provides that if a child survives the abortion living the doctor cannot kill it. The penalty is fines or 5 yrs in prison.
HOWEVER, the mother cannot be punished in any manner if the child is killed or allowed to die by withholding treatment.
Therefore, the doctor can simply say "Ms. Jones, would you please take this hammer and whack that baby a few times in the head?"
No one could be punished.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 2/26/19 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

the doctor can simply say "Ms. Jones, would you please take this hammer and whack that baby a few times in the head?" No one could be punished.
Under FEDERAL law.

Where is it written that there should be a FEDERAL remedy for every wrong?
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55505 posts
Posted on 2/26/19 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

pwejr88


Liar.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 2/26/19 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

The bill was to make it a felony for doctors to not provide care for babies that survive and abortion attempt.


Attempted murder is a felony, so...
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
117150 posts
Posted on 2/26/19 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

Where is it written that there should be a FEDERAL remedy for every wrong?


Roe v. Wade made it federal law, not me. The senate bill that was voted down simply limited what was protected by Roe. It did not include restricting the acts of the mother. Abortion IS an act of killing by the mother and it is currently in the Constitution.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55505 posts
Posted on 2/26/19 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

1. If a fetus is born alive, would it not already be a crime (homicide) to kill it? Why is this proposal not redundant of existing States homicide laws?


It should be, but states are seeking to undo that. Northham speaking clearly stated that.

quote:

2. What is the Constititional basis for yet another federal criminal law? Should this matter not be decided by the States?


When states or talk for states begin to erode the right of LIFE of a living human who has committed no crime, the job of the FED GOV is to protect and serve punishment.

From the outset, THIS nation has sought to defend life. When we declared our independence we specifically stated and used the word LIFE:

that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.



Posted by TheRoarRestoredInBR
Member since Dec 2004
31093 posts
Posted on 2/26/19 at 12:23 pm to
Johnny Cash..

You can run on for a long time
Run on for a long time
Run on for a long time
Sooner or later God'll cut you down
Sooner or later God'll cut you down
Go tell that long tongue liar
Go and tell that midnight rider
Tell the rambler
The gambler
The back biter
Tell 'em that God's gonna cut 'em down
Tell 'em that God's gonna cut 'em down
Well my goodness gracious let me tell you the news
My head's been wet with the midnight dew
I've been down on bended knee talkin' to the man from Galilee
He spoke to me in the voice so sweet
I thought I heard the shuffle of the angel's feet
He called my name and my heart stood still
When he said, "John, go do my will!"
Go tell that long tongue liar
Go and tell that midnight rider
Tell the rambler
The gambler
The back biter
Tell 'em that God's gonna cut 'em down
Tell 'em that God's gonna cut 'em down
You can run on for a long time
Run on for a long time
Run on for a long time
Sooner or later God'll cut you down
Sooner or later God'll cut you down
Well, you may throw your rock and hide your hand
Workin' in the dark against your fellow man
But as sure as God made black and white
What's down in the dark will be brought to the light
You can run on for a long time
Run on for a long time
Run on for a long time
Sooner or later God'll cut you down
Sooner or later God'll cut you down
Go tell that long tongue liar
Go and tell that midnight rider
Tell the rambler
The gambler
The back biter
Tell 'em that God's gonna cut 'em down
Tell 'em that God's gonna cut 'em down
Tell 'em that God's gonna cut you down
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55505 posts
Posted on 2/26/19 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

Where is it written that there should be a FEDERAL remedy for every wrong?


THe federal Gov already has the authority.

Under the 5th, for one example, you can not take the life of any USA citizen without due process.

In fact, the 5th contains 2 clauses.


A baby born alive within the USA is a Citizen... THEREFORE a DR nor a MOTHER can kill it without DUE process.


Next
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134141 posts
Posted on 2/26/19 at 12:30 pm to
quote:


Where is it written that there should be a FEDERAL remedy for every wrong?


Zero people have intimated this.
Posted by Costanza
Member since May 2011
3272 posts
Posted on 2/26/19 at 12:32 pm to
Aren’t people born in the US citizens?

Muh birthright citizenship!!
Posted by Lg
Hayden, Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
8563 posts
Posted on 2/26/19 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

Our societal structure requires at least some basic level of respect for our fellow man or it falls apart.


Roger, we have had this discussion many times on here and maybe you are now beginning to understand that without a standard (God) then society can be anything man/woman wants it to be. All due to the selfishness of human nature.
Posted by pwejr88
Red Stick
Member since Apr 2007
37748 posts
Posted on 2/26/19 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

Jjdoc


I know you would support distorting the facts because you do it often.

My point remains the same for you as well.

We're all MAGA, let's just keep it simple and factual. Don't let the liberals' tactics venture over into ours. That's my point.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55505 posts
Posted on 2/26/19 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

I know you would support distorting the facts because you do it often.

My point remains the same for you as well.


This bill was clear. 44 dems did in fact vote against it most stating it was a right of the mother.

It's not. A life born here is a USA Citizen. For the DEMS to support the killing of a USA citizen without DUE PROCESS is and should be shunned.

Your point is way off.

quote:

Nearly half of the United States Senate believes, or thinks their constituents believe, that a doctor should be allowed to terminate potentially viable fetus after they are born.

This is disingenuous and you know it. The bill was to make it a felony for doctors to not provide care for babies that survive and abortion attempt.


A Baby is a USA citizen. Period.

Therefore the DR is required to care for it. This should not be up for debate. It should not be a question.

The left is void of decency and of morals.

PERIOD



Posted by pwejr88
Red Stick
Member since Apr 2007
37748 posts
Posted on 2/26/19 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

Therefore the DR is required to care for it.


The bill doesn't prohibit doctors from taking care of it, it simply doesn't charge the doctor with a felony if he doesn't. (which I agree should happen)
Posted by Lg
Hayden, Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
8563 posts
Posted on 2/26/19 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

it simply doesn't charge the doctor with a felony if he doesn't.


Then he/she doesn't need to be a doctor.
Posted by pwejr88
Red Stick
Member since Apr 2007
37748 posts
Posted on 2/26/19 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

Then he/she doesn't need to be a doctor.


Agreed.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 2/26/19 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

A Baby is a USA citizen. Period.
Once born, yes.
quote:

Therefore the DR is required to care for it.
Really? If so, why would we need a NEW law saying exactly the same thing?

But I am not entirely certain that your assertion is accurate. I though that a parent (rather than the government) makes medical decisions (what treatment and whether any treatment at all) on behalf of a minor child.
Posted by 31TIGERS
Mike’s habitat
Member since Dec 2004
7219 posts
Posted on 2/26/19 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

"pro-life Catholics" will vote lock-step for Democratic candidates.


bullshite! Born and raised Catholic and neither me nor any family member has ever voted democrat. And that current socialist pope can go kick rocks.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram