- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What a staff, what a staff, what a staff!
Posted on 1/12/10 at 9:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 1/12/10 at 9:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
I LOVE the hire.......a scumbag coach for a scum of a school....
GREATness
GREATness
0
Posted on 1/12/10 at 9:20 pm to DaLSUTigers
5-15 with Oakland
7-6 with UT
Congrats
There's a reason why Sark, Rilly and Del Rio said no = Sanctions.
7-6 with UT
Congrats
There's a reason why Sark, Rilly and Del Rio said no = Sanctions.
Posted on 1/12/10 at 9:21 pm to hacanms
its called denial
Posted on 1/12/10 at 9:28 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
No staff better
AS IN "STAFF INFECTION".
I see the second coming of the U. (as in U of Miami)
Posted on 1/12/10 at 9:28 pm to LSUTANGERINE
Clearly you are using the word staff as a euphamism for a penis...
Posted on 1/12/10 at 9:34 pm to DocBugbear
Sark would have been much better choice.
This is a big roll of the dice in my opinion.
This is a big roll of the dice in my opinion.
Posted on 1/12/10 at 9:41 pm to Tig1969
quote:
There's a reason why Sark, Rilly and Del Rio said no = Sanctions.
Word leaks out. High level folks at universities are often aware of pending sactions, maybe not what they will be. I don't think USC would bring in such a staff, especially Kiffen, and spend that kind of money if they believed sanctions were looming. But who knows?
Posted on 1/12/10 at 9:44 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
No staff better
Bama's staff is
Posted on 1/12/10 at 9:46 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
I don't think USC would bring in such a staff, especially Kiffen, and spend that kind of money if they believed sanctions were looming.
I respectfully disagree. USC football is still a big-time business, and needs to keep that cash-flow going. The USC Athletic Dept realizes that they didn't make a huge hire, so they wanted to excite the fanbase by bringing back most of the past ingridients that gave yall success plus Monte Kiffen. This staff will keep most of the fanbase excited thus buying season tix, merchandise, etc.
Even if they know NCAA is looming, you still want to make as much as you can and put together the best staff possible that will help you weather the storm.
Posted on 1/12/10 at 9:47 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
I don't think USC would bring in such a staff, especially Kiffen
i'm not being a smartass here i'm really confused what you mean by that.
Posted on 1/12/10 at 9:50 pm to Rocket
quote:
No staff better
quote:
Bama's staff is
Once again, clearly you are using the word staff as a euphamism for a penis...
Posted on 1/12/10 at 9:51 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
I don't think USC would bring in such a staff, especially Kiffen, and spend that kind of money if they believed sanctions were looming. But who knows?
There has to be a reason behind it.
I mean seriously, he absolutely sucks as a coach.
Did they just not want to waste a good hire when they know they are out on their asses soon? I think this is it.
Or did they just enjoy the lack of pressure of playing in a December bowl?
Posted on 1/12/10 at 9:52 pm to drexyl
quote:
i'm not being a smartass here i'm really confused what you mean by that.
IMO, if they belived sanctions were coming, having Kiffen aboard certainly would not give the image of trying to clean things up.
Posted on 1/12/10 at 9:52 pm to drexyl
quote:
I don't think USC would bring in such a staff, especially Kiffen
i'm not being a smartass here i'm really confused what you mean by that.
It is amazing isnt it? It is like reverse world.
Posted on 1/12/10 at 9:52 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
There has to be a reason behind it.
I mean seriously, he absolutely sucks as a coach.
Did they just not want to waste a good hire when they know they are out on their asses soon? I think this is it.
Or did they just enjoy the lack of pressure of playing in a December bowl?
I believe the hire was as much, if not more, about the new staff, than Kiffen
Posted on 1/12/10 at 9:54 pm to Barry Badrinath
quote:
I respectfully disagree. USC football is still a big-time business, and needs to keep that cash-flow going. The USC Athletic Dept realizes that they didn't make a huge hire, so they wanted to excite the fanbase by bringing back most of the past ingridients that gave yall success plus Monte Kiffen. This staff will keep most of the fanbase excited thus buying season tix, merchandise, etc.
Even if they know NCAA is looming, you still want to make as much as you can and put together the best staff possible that will help you weather the storm.
another point of view that is rational and makes sense as well. I've thought about that one too, but went with the more optimistic one.
Posted on 1/12/10 at 9:56 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
I believe the hire was as much, if not more, about the new staff, than Kiffen
Honestly, in all seriousness, why is this even remotely a positive move.
Monte is not able to translate his success at Tampa to the college rank.
O is a liability of the highest order.
And Chow has not really duplicated the success he had at USC. Success with a group of the most gifted athletes just about ever assembled at the college ranks.
I would be absolutely horrified at this hire if I was a USC fan.
Posted on 1/12/10 at 9:56 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:so hiring kiffin indicates this because he's been so notoriously dirty at UT that USC wouldn't dare hire him unless they were free and clear from the NCAA or because you don't think you could make this impressive of a hire if sanctions were known to be on the horizon? again serious question.
IMO, if they belived sanctions were coming, having Kiffen aboard certainly would not give the image of trying to clean things up.
ETA: you should also learn to spell his name; he's going to be your head coach for the next year and a half.
This post was edited on 1/12/10 at 10:00 pm
Posted on 1/12/10 at 9:56 pm to LSUTANGERINE
chow is so overrated
you have to go back like 6 years to find his last real success
you have to go back like 6 years to find his last real success
Posted on 1/12/10 at 9:59 pm to DBG
Hell... Chow is the only part of this menagerie that USC fans should be happy with...
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News