- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The not a great candidate argument is so sheepish.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 11:50 am
Posted on 12/7/22 at 11:50 am
Federman is not a great candidate.
Katie Hobbs, who never debated is not a great candidate.
You want to call warnock a better candidate than Walker, fine. However, he was not a great candidate either.
The entire argument comes from McConnell.
You fall right in line with the division they want. Republicans and democrats have done nothing “for the people” in 40 years. Once you realize they are for maintaining their position and will help each other do it, then you may vote a little differently.
This was never about trump. It was about someone who is an outsider from the same ole shitty politicians. That’s both, D and R.
I got news, McConnell, Romney, Collins, Graham, etc, are not for you and are not really republicans.
You want to know why McConnell wants the opposition? He keeps his position. Had those candidates won, he’s out as leader.
America needs to vote non incumbent if they want someone for them. A politician that’s been in there for 40 years is not for the people.
Katie Hobbs, who never debated is not a great candidate.
You want to call warnock a better candidate than Walker, fine. However, he was not a great candidate either.
The entire argument comes from McConnell.
You fall right in line with the division they want. Republicans and democrats have done nothing “for the people” in 40 years. Once you realize they are for maintaining their position and will help each other do it, then you may vote a little differently.
This was never about trump. It was about someone who is an outsider from the same ole shitty politicians. That’s both, D and R.
I got news, McConnell, Romney, Collins, Graham, etc, are not for you and are not really republicans.
You want to know why McConnell wants the opposition? He keeps his position. Had those candidates won, he’s out as leader.
America needs to vote non incumbent if they want someone for them. A politician that’s been in there for 40 years is not for the people.
23
Posted on 12/7/22 at 11:51 am to dos crystal
Yep. Games within games.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 11:52 am to dos crystal
quote:
The not a great candidate argument is so sheepish.
Democrats vote for policy, doesn't matter who the candidate is.
They know how to win elections.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 11:53 am to dos crystal
quote:
The not a great candidate argument is so sheepish.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 11:53 am to dos crystal
They won’t listen. TDS is too strong for them to see past Trump.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 11:55 am to dos crystal
quote:Was the LT. Governor - Experience
Federman
quote:Was the SOS - Experience
Katie Hobbs
Oz & Lake - TV
Posted on 12/7/22 at 11:55 am to dos crystal
Most republicans are sheepish, no different than radical leftists. That's why Mitch has been in power so long and has once again effortlessly brainwashed republicans over the past two years.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 11:56 am to dos crystal
Is it weird that I’ve been voting for over 30 years (and extremely rarely voting for anyone I truly WANT) and yet only recently have I ever seen such handwringing over the “quality” of candidates?
Hell, I’ve voted for more shite candidates than “quality” candidates in my lifetime, but only NOW is it the biggest issue for our concern?
Hell, I’ve voted for more shite candidates than “quality” candidates in my lifetime, but only NOW is it the biggest issue for our concern?
Posted on 12/7/22 at 11:57 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Was the LT. Governor - Experience
Lolololol.
Here’s a fella who has no idea what a Lieutenant Governor does. You wake up in the morning. Check your texts and emails to make sure the Governor didn’t die, then you go to a Rotary lunch.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 11:58 am to dos crystal
It’s possible for both candidates in a race to be bad candidates. Ultimately voters have tk choose between the two options. Fetterman and Oz were both bad candidates. Ultimately, Fetterman connected more with PA voters and earned their votes. Walker and Warnock were both bad candidates, but Warnock connected more with GA voters and won.
Elections are won in then margins in swing states, not with party loyalists.
Elections are won in then margins in swing states, not with party loyalists.
This post was edited on 12/7/22 at 11:59 am
Posted on 12/7/22 at 11:58 am to Jack Carter
Didn't Hillary Clinton lose to Trump? Including in some states that hadn't voted R for President since 1988? Bad D candidates don't always win.
And just because some bad D candidates win does not mean that we should nominate bad candidates, too. You don't want ads running saying that your nominee paid for abortions and beat his wife. Latham Saddler, Gary Black, etc, have not done those things. As a Christian of course I believe in forgiveness but this isn't about anyone's eternal soul. It just politics and a nominee like that is not worth the trouble.
And just because some bad D candidates win does not mean that we should nominate bad candidates, too. You don't want ads running saying that your nominee paid for abortions and beat his wife. Latham Saddler, Gary Black, etc, have not done those things. As a Christian of course I believe in forgiveness but this isn't about anyone's eternal soul. It just politics and a nominee like that is not worth the trouble.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 11:59 am to dos crystal
quote:
You want to call warnock a better candidate than Walker, fine. However, he was not a great candidate either.
So we agree the best candidate won? Sounds like the system is working?
Posted on 12/7/22 at 11:59 am to the808bass
quote:
Here’s a fella who has no idea what a Lieutenant Governor does. You wake up in the morning. Check your texts and emails to make sure the Governor didn’t die, then you go to a Rotary lunch.
He was a Mayor for 13 years before that also.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 11:59 am to dos crystal
quote:
The entire argument comes from McConnell.
No it doesn’t. At all. Pretty much everyone outside of the most hardened Trump loyalists have said it from the moment Trump endorsed Walker.
This post was edited on 12/7/22 at 12:06 pm
Posted on 12/7/22 at 12:00 pm to Snipe
quote:
Democrats vote for policy, doesn't matter who the candidate is.
And they are easily motivated and manipulated by fear.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 12:00 pm to TomJoadGhost
quote:
Fetterman connected more with PA voters
This is a wholly inaccurate description of the process of a guy hiding from a campaign process. They may have connected with the campaign. They didn’t connect with him.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 12:03 pm to the808bass
However you want to splice it. He did more than Oz to win over PA voters.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 12:04 pm to Mickey Goldmill
He was Mayor of a town of less than 2,000 people. It’s a glorified HOA position.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 12:06 pm to TomJoadGhost
quote:
He did more than Oz
No. “He” did not. He’s almost retarded. His campaign (including his accomplices in the media) did. He didn’t do anything.
Posted on 12/7/22 at 12:07 pm to TomJoadGhost
The entire comparison is absurd to begin with. John Fetterman will never be relevant to whether Herschel Walker was a bad candidate, or the fact that Republican candidates don’t enjoy the level of blind party support in purple areas that Democrat candidates often do.
This post was edited on 12/7/22 at 12:08 pm
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News