- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The low IQs attempt to “cope”…must really really suck to be a low IQ lib these days huh?
Posted on 1/5/26 at 11:37 am
Posted on 1/5/26 at 11:37 am
Posted on 1/5/26 at 11:47 am to Ceazar
Makes fun of low IQs but doesn't know how to use the embed button. 
Posted on 1/5/26 at 11:51 am to Ceazar
We had several posters here downplaying the Minnesota fraud scandal just last week. I wonder if any of them will admit they were wrong?
Tim Walz had no intention of dropping out of his race until this scandal hit. He knows how bad it is, and he also knows what else might be coming out about this situation and potentially other matters.
Tim Walz had no intention of dropping out of his race until this scandal hit. He knows how bad it is, and he also knows what else might be coming out about this situation and potentially other matters.
Posted on 1/5/26 at 12:37 pm to aubiecat
quote:
Makes fun of low IQs but doesn't know how to use the embed button
Does not deny it’s low IQ status
Thank God for President Trump!
Posted on 1/5/26 at 12:41 pm to KCT
quote:
We had several posters here downplaying the Minnesota fraud scandal just last week. I wonder if any of them will admit they were wrong?
Low IQs do not understand they are wrong…their lack of comprehension and self- awareness precludes them from engaging with reality.
Thank God for President Trump!
Posted on 1/5/26 at 12:46 pm to Ceazar
For five years—actually, now it's almost six years—I have been told on this board by the vast majority of posters—like, 96% of them—that we have no business sending troops, weapons, aid of any kind, any military personnel, ANYTHING to anywhere else in the world to help the citizens of any other country out because it's none of our business, it's not our responsibility, they aren't sending their children to dangerous shithole countries to put them a risk for non-American citizens, and any time we intervene in world affairs it's because Globalists are trying to start wars for profit.
That narrative was on full display here as recently as last week. So here's my question:
All those people posting that stuff for almost six years here were low IQ libs?
That's who was saying all that stuff here?
That narrative was on full display here as recently as last week. So here's my question:
All those people posting that stuff for almost six years here were low IQ libs?
That's who was saying all that stuff here?
Posted on 1/5/26 at 12:51 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
For five years—actually, now it's almost six years—I
Low IQs cannot differentiate between actual national security operations and globalist “nation-building” and money laundering.
Poor simple low IQs…see my post above
Thank God for President Trump!
Posted on 1/5/26 at 1:08 pm to Ceazar
quote:
Low IQs cannot differentiate between actual national security operations
Nope.
That's not what you or any other populist MAGA simpletons are arguing.
Your argument is that it helped Venezuelan citizens out. Which you were staunchly against. Last week.
quote:
globalist “nation-building”
Let's see. Venezuela has been a puppet state for China and Russia and has actively participated in propping up Cuba. It would be kind of hard to pick two major world countries more resistant to globalism than China and Russia...about the best you could say is that China might be selectively globalist, but only on their own terms and largely restricted to trade.
So go for it. Explain to me, since I have a limited IQ, exactly how this was an anti-globalist action since it opposed the purposes of two of the biggest anti-globalist entities on the world stage.
Also, while you're at it, how is literally removing the leader of a sovereign nation and announcing you're going to run the place for a while not "nation-building?"
quote:
money laundering.
Link?
Posted on 1/5/26 at 1:13 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
That's not what you or any other populist MAGA simpletons are arguing.
Low IQ proving my point with determination
Thank God for President Trump!
Posted on 1/5/26 at 1:15 pm to Ceazar
I’ll tell you what I’m shocked by.
I have a buddy who is a big lib and does not like Trump at all actually tell me he was disgusted that he actually agreed with a lot of Nick Fuentes points.
I don’t know what this means but I was a bit shocked there wasn’t major pushback on every single topic.
Curious to see where this leads.
I have a buddy who is a big lib and does not like Trump at all actually tell me he was disgusted that he actually agreed with a lot of Nick Fuentes points.
I don’t know what this means but I was a bit shocked there wasn’t major pushback on every single topic.
Curious to see where this leads.
This post was edited on 1/5/26 at 1:16 pm
Posted on 1/5/26 at 1:26 pm to Ceazar
quote:
Complete Non-Answer
That's what I thought.
You know those guys who go around college campuses and film themselves asking college students about quotes that Biden or Obama or Clinton or someone else said but attributing them to Trump, and the students always think they're terrible...until it's revealed that it was actually some Democrat who said it and not Trump?
That's y'all. You're that stupid.
Posted on 1/5/26 at 1:43 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
Nope.
That's not what you or any other populist MAGA simpletons are arguing
Someone did not watch or understand the video. The dude is not MAGA. Far from it actually. He is trolling. Doing a pretty good job of it.
Posted on 1/5/26 at 1:54 pm to Ceazar
That was the dumbest thing I've ever watched.
Posted on 1/5/26 at 2:50 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
For five years—actually, now it's almost six years—I have been told on this board by the vast majority of posters—like, 96% of them—that we have no business sending troops, weapons, aid of any kind, any military personnel, ANYTHING to anywhere else in the world to help the citizens of any other country out because it's none of our business, it's not our responsibility, they aren't sending their children to dangerous shithole countries to put them a risk for non-American citizens, and any time we intervene in world affairs it's because Globalists are trying to start wars for profit.
The premise of your argument is that our action in Venezuela and everywhere else was solely to help out their citizens. That is incorrect.
Posted on 1/5/26 at 2:55 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
Your argument is that it helped Venezuelan citizens out.
Yes, when progs were crying and protesting. Helping Venezuelans wasn't the goal. We're just rubbing educated progs noses in how uneducated they are.
Posted on 1/5/26 at 2:58 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
For five years—actually, now it's almost six years—I have been told on this board by the vast majority of posters—like, 96% of them—that we have no business sending troops, weapons, aid of any kind, any military personnel, ANYTHING to anywhere else in the world to help the citizens of any other country out because it's none of our business, it's not our responsibility, they aren't sending their children to dangerous shithole countries to put them a risk for non-American citizens, and any time we intervene in world affairs it's because Globalists are trying to start wars for profit.
The irony of you railing on people as "simpletons" when this is your actual analysis of the situation couldn't be richer.
Posted on 1/5/26 at 3:08 pm to Ceazar
Are this guy's neighbors narcoterrorists? I guess he thinks he can just take over any neighbor's property just because he feels like it. If he was serious and did it, he would be shot, and rightly so. Try it genius.
Popular
Back to top
7









