- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Moneyball vs the Yankees
Posted on 1/6/26 at 8:50 am
Posted on 1/6/26 at 8:50 am
I think there are two schools of thought in this NIL/Portal world in which we live.
1) There is the Yankees approach of throwing money at whoever is considered the top players available (Texas Tech, Miami, and LSU this past season)
and
2) the money ball approach of building the best overall roster with the funds available (Indiana, Ole Miss in the last cycle)
It appears LSU is taking more of a moneyball approach this year to rebuild the entire roster including depth due to the dire state of the offensive roster.
1) There is the Yankees approach of throwing money at whoever is considered the top players available (Texas Tech, Miami, and LSU this past season)
and
2) the money ball approach of building the best overall roster with the funds available (Indiana, Ole Miss in the last cycle)
It appears LSU is taking more of a moneyball approach this year to rebuild the entire roster including depth due to the dire state of the offensive roster.
This post was edited on 1/6/26 at 8:51 am
Posted on 1/6/26 at 9:00 am to jmaclsu
The Dodgers use moneyball better than the As ever did and also spend more than the Yankees.
That's the actual model.
That's the actual model.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 9:03 am to jmaclsu
You do both. I think that's the key.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 9:05 am to ProjectP2294
Maybe so. He is just saying they are taking a carefully planned approach because we have more starting roster holes than most, which means we have to spread money around more.
And I agree. Like he said, look at Indiana. Look at ole miss last year.
I am tired of coaches relying on media or trying to win the preseason Twitter awards instead of just doing their own homework ala Cignetti.
And I agree. Like he said, look at Indiana. Look at ole miss last year.
I am tired of coaches relying on media or trying to win the preseason Twitter awards instead of just doing their own homework ala Cignetti.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 9:11 am to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
Maybe so. He is just saying they are taking a carefully planned approach because we have more starting roster holes than most, which means we have to spread money around more.
And I agree. Like he said, look at Indiana. Look at ole miss last year.
I am tired of coaches relying on media or trying to win the preseason Twitter awards instead of just doing their own homework ala Cignetti.
Thank you. Worded much better than I did to express my thoughts.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 9:15 am to Yeti_Chaser
quote:
Too early to tell
And way too early to tell the quality of our portal and recruiting classes. Best evaluation will be in October thru January 2027(hopefully). Brian Kelly and LSU were the portal kings until about game 5 this year. While Lane Kiffin and little brother Ole Miss took some FCS QB no one had ever heard of before October.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 9:16 am to jmaclsu
Indiana has no NIL moneyball issues.
Popular
Back to top
4





