- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
US companies are poised to receive record windfalls of tariffs if SC rules against Trump
Posted on 1/14/26 at 8:15 am
Posted on 1/14/26 at 8:15 am
But I thought foreign companies would be paying the tariffs?
Kalshi has only 28% likelihood the admin wins their case. I hope that’s incorrect.
Kalshi has only 28% likelihood the admin wins their case. I hope that’s incorrect.
9
Posted on 1/14/26 at 8:18 am to slackster
quote:
US companies are poised to receive record windfalls of tariffs if SC rules against Trump
Says who
quote:
Kalshi has only 28% likelihood the admin wins their case. I hope that’s incorrect
Sure you do
Posted on 1/14/26 at 8:21 am to slackster
quote:
But I thought we would be paying the tariffs?
Fify, retard
Posted on 1/14/26 at 8:21 am to slackster
quote:
But I thought foreign companies would be paying the tariffs?
How do you think tariffs work in a competitive market?
quote:
Kalshi has only 28% likelihood the admin wins their case.
Who?
Posted on 1/14/26 at 8:24 am to slackster
quote:
Kalshi has only 28% likelihood the admin wins their case. I hope that’s incorrect.
Well, I’m not buying their cereal anymore!
Posted on 1/14/26 at 8:29 am to slackster
Only a highly educated economist such as SFP and Roger can even begin to comprehend the depths of the tariff issue
Posted on 1/14/26 at 8:30 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Sure you do
Why would any sane person want the administration to lose? The chaos after a loss isn’t worth it. They have plenty of avenues they can pursue if these are struck down. It’s not like tariffs go away for good if they lose.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 8:33 am to LSUnation78
quote:
But I thought we would be paying the tariffs?
Fify, retard
Only on the political talk can people argue that corporate taxes are paid by consumers but tariffs are paid by … someone else?
That square peg cannot be rounded.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 8:34 am to slackster
quote:
Only on the political talk can people argue that corporate taxes are paid by consumers but tariffs are paid by … someone else?
That square peg cannot be rounded.
Because tariffs are magic
Posted on 1/14/26 at 8:38 am to slackster
If that's the case the American people will be the losers in all of this. The U.S. companies passed on the tariffs to us. So at the end of the day corporations made money on the deal. They passed the increased tariffs on and will be reimbursed.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 8:45 am to justjoe906
quote:
The U.S. companies passed on the tariffs to us
And the prices won't go all the way back to pre-tariff levels. They may go down but the delta will be in favor of the companies.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 8:48 am to slackster
I wonder how many companies who raised prices due to tariffs will lower them once they get refunded?
I’ll put the over/under at zero
I’ll put the over/under at zero
Posted on 1/14/26 at 8:48 am to BurlesonCountyAg
Speaking of Roger, where is he. Did a polar bear eat him or something? (I hope not. That poor bear would have MASSIVE indigestion and might not survive)
Posted on 1/14/26 at 8:53 am to slackster
Yeah, those Trump tariffs are causing prices to skyrocket! Whatever will we do???
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 1/14/26 at 8:55 am to Robin Masters
quote:
Yeah, those Trump tariffs are causing prices to skyrocket! Whatever will we do???
what is this straw man?Posted on 1/14/26 at 8:57 am to slackster
There is a few provisions in code that will allow differently
Posted on 1/14/26 at 9:00 am to slackster
There are backup plans for most of the tariffs, when we have signed agreements with countries, those should stand, etc. Other regulations allow tariffs. The ruling may only be going forward not backwards.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 9:00 am to slackster
quote:
what is this straw man?
Tariffs are supposed to drive inflation way up. That has not happened yet.
So the corporations will get the benefit and not the "people"?
Posted on 1/14/26 at 9:03 am to slackster
quote:
Only on the political talk can people argue that corporate taxes are paid by consumers but tariffs are paid by … someone else?
Yet if you step back you would find that the people who oppose the tariffs want much higher corporate income taxes. They have no concern that those additional burdens will be passed on to the consumer.
The right much more readily acknowledges that all the costs of a business are ultimately paid by the consumer.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 9:03 am to slackster
I don't deny that tariffs are eventually paid by the consumer.
My argument is that tariffs are a superior system to the income tax system. We need to abolish the income tax system and go to a consumer tax system.
My argument is that tariffs are a superior system to the income tax system. We need to abolish the income tax system and go to a consumer tax system.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News