- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The Left is angry because they were robbed of a martyr again.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 3:19 pm
Posted on 1/24/26 at 3:19 pm
On this forum and everywhere else.
They want more than anything to have George Floyd 2.0.
They thought they had one, but it was just a child abusing lunatic white woman who's sex partner encouraged her to run over a Law Officer.
What did they do? First they claimed that she was just there by accident, later videos showed she had been interfering for an extended period of time. Then they moved the goalposts, claims the officer wasn't hit, then later when Video showed he got hit and had actually went to hospital with injuries, they claimed well assault with a deadly weapon is no reason to shoot someone.
There are plenty of low information voters that now think she was a mom who was just going to work.
And now here we go again, someone who was fully armed and stalking ICE officers, with enough ammo to kill a dozen of them and 6 more bystanders gets shot, and first it's oh they just grabbed him and executed him, now it's well he was armed, and had 2 extra mags on his body, had deleted his social media, and was filming ICE in -5 weather before he rushed to confront officers when they had an altercation with other protesters.
It's now a goalpost move to ICE can't shoot someone unless they shoot first, and if he loses the gun, they have to assume he's helpless and unarmed, even if they don't see it.
Again they are trying to spin George Floyd 2.0, but this one isn't it either.
I look forward to the body cam videos.
They want more than anything to have George Floyd 2.0.
They thought they had one, but it was just a child abusing lunatic white woman who's sex partner encouraged her to run over a Law Officer.
What did they do? First they claimed that she was just there by accident, later videos showed she had been interfering for an extended period of time. Then they moved the goalposts, claims the officer wasn't hit, then later when Video showed he got hit and had actually went to hospital with injuries, they claimed well assault with a deadly weapon is no reason to shoot someone.
There are plenty of low information voters that now think she was a mom who was just going to work.
And now here we go again, someone who was fully armed and stalking ICE officers, with enough ammo to kill a dozen of them and 6 more bystanders gets shot, and first it's oh they just grabbed him and executed him, now it's well he was armed, and had 2 extra mags on his body, had deleted his social media, and was filming ICE in -5 weather before he rushed to confront officers when they had an altercation with other protesters.
It's now a goalpost move to ICE can't shoot someone unless they shoot first, and if he loses the gun, they have to assume he's helpless and unarmed, even if they don't see it.
Again they are trying to spin George Floyd 2.0, but this one isn't it either.
I look forward to the body cam videos.
This post was edited on 1/24/26 at 3:25 pm
Posted on 1/24/26 at 3:21 pm to Narax
All the left does is gaslight this will likely be no different
This post was edited on 1/24/26 at 4:07 pm
Posted on 1/24/26 at 3:23 pm to Narax
Hey at least white lives matter to them again lol
Posted on 1/24/26 at 3:33 pm to SaintsReportExile
what's the way back machine say about his history
Posted on 1/24/26 at 3:45 pm to Narax
I am glad no officers were hurt. It is just a matter of time before these lunatics start shooting agents because they have the green light from the gov. and mayor.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 3:46 pm to Narax
quote:
child abusing
What’s the story on this? I guess I missed it.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:03 pm to FieldEngineer
quote:
What’s the story on this? I guess I missed it.
She had lost custody of her two kids from her first marriage.
When her second husband died she started yanking the kid around the country, hooked up with a lesbian, moved him to Canada where they seemed to have no income.
Then then went to Minneapolis where she threw him in a super pro trans woke school and then got herself involved with overthrow the government extreme woke types.
The grandfather of the little boy hopefully has custody now.
Plus there are a number of unverified claims out there, but it will take a while to see any of them verified.
But everything above is confirmed.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:12 pm to Narax
The MSM always looks for outlier situations that will influence their audience.
I call it “Ryan Whiting” after the kid they used during the height of the AIDS scare.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:32 pm to Narax
quote:
They want more than anything to have George Floyd 2.0.
That's never happening again. Ever.
And if there was going to be an equivalent event that had the Right fired up in the streets, it would've happened when they shot Trump and Charlie Kirk.
I feel like the Right is so damn exhausted at this point, that if the left started burning cities again, the most fed-up Right-wingers would just start shooting them.
Remember the old writing about "the men who wanted to be left alone". When the Right finally snaps, it's not going to be a few isolated protests in cities where law enforcement will tolerate it. It's going to be a reckoning.

Posted on 1/24/26 at 7:51 pm to TigerAxeOK
quote:
That's never happening again. Ever.
Agreed, never again will many people let themselves be bullied into silence designed to create lawlessness.
Popular
Back to top
6








