- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Court rules ICE violating Constitutional rights
Posted on 2/15/26 at 8:59 am
Posted on 2/15/26 at 8:59 am
Court rebukes Trump administration for denying immigration detainees access to lawyers
The Supreme Court already ruled in Trumps favor to be more aggressive when deporting illegal aliens.
This is just another activist and wearing a robe.
Politico
The Supreme Court already ruled in Trumps favor to be more aggressive when deporting illegal aliens.
This is just another activist and wearing a robe.
quote:
U.S. District Judge Nancy Brasel said it appeared the Trump administration had surged law enforcement into the Twin Cities without accounting for “the constitutional rights of its civil detainees” held by Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
quote:
The government suggests—with minimal explanation and even less evidence—that doing so would result in ‘chaos,’” wrote Brasel, an appointee of President Donald Trump. “The Constitution does not permit the government to arrest thousands of individuals and then disregard their constitutional rights because it would be too challenging to honor those rights.” The judge ordered the administration to dramatically revamp conditions in the Bishop Henry Whipple federal building, and provide routine and unmonitored phone access to detainees, including the chance to alert attorneys and family members at least one hour before being transferred out of state.
Politico
15
Posted on 2/15/26 at 9:02 am to Chazreinhold
They are building a huge transition hub in Arizona, they are really only pursuing criminal act aliens at present, the mass removal of just regular aliens will come after midterms, when Trump won’t GAF afterwards
Posted on 2/15/26 at 9:03 am to Chazreinhold
For the 56,321st time: ILLEGAL INVADERS DON'T HAVE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
Posted on 2/15/26 at 9:04 am to Chazreinhold
Overruled. And frick off lower courts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 9:11 am to CamdenTiger
Operation move back better
Posted on 2/15/26 at 9:30 am to Chazreinhold
Ignore the courts like biden did on the student loan payoffs.
Posted on 2/15/26 at 9:43 am to CamdenTiger
ICE has an impossible task. They are responsible for enforcing US immigration laws. This includes removal of immigrants that have no legal basis for being in the country.
During the previous administration, the US was the only country in the world that essentially had an open border policy. Somewhere between 8 and 21 million people entered the US through the southern border. Many of them entered as asylum-seekers and were readily let in with a pinky swear promise to attend an asylum hearing in a US court (which everybody knows will never happen, given the backlog of cases to hear).
Many more people came in without even checking in at the door. We have no idea who many of these people are. We know that there are violent criminals, drug traffickers, and human traffickers, terrorists, and the like. ICE is tasked to root out the people that are here illegally. They have stated they are searching for the most violent criminals as their to priority.
Rather than assist ICE in their efforts, for some reason, city, county, and state leaders across the country (mayors, governors, judges, attorneys general, and the like) are actively impeding ICE and their efforts to enforce laws. They are also riling up citizen armies to impede the enforcement of US law.
Federal lawmakers are on record in support of abolishing immigration enforcement altogether. People are intent on making an impossible job even more impossible. We look for anything we can to put law enforcement at fault, instead of the law breakers.
We really should put this to a vote in Washington -- do we want to get rid of our border enforcement and just let anyone come in and out as they please, unchecked.? Because any restriction on entry and staying in this country will require some entity to enforce the laws. And weak enforcement is just another way of saying we really aren't serious about having a border.
During the previous administration, the US was the only country in the world that essentially had an open border policy. Somewhere between 8 and 21 million people entered the US through the southern border. Many of them entered as asylum-seekers and were readily let in with a pinky swear promise to attend an asylum hearing in a US court (which everybody knows will never happen, given the backlog of cases to hear).
Many more people came in without even checking in at the door. We have no idea who many of these people are. We know that there are violent criminals, drug traffickers, and human traffickers, terrorists, and the like. ICE is tasked to root out the people that are here illegally. They have stated they are searching for the most violent criminals as their to priority.
Rather than assist ICE in their efforts, for some reason, city, county, and state leaders across the country (mayors, governors, judges, attorneys general, and the like) are actively impeding ICE and their efforts to enforce laws. They are also riling up citizen armies to impede the enforcement of US law.
Federal lawmakers are on record in support of abolishing immigration enforcement altogether. People are intent on making an impossible job even more impossible. We look for anything we can to put law enforcement at fault, instead of the law breakers.
We really should put this to a vote in Washington -- do we want to get rid of our border enforcement and just let anyone come in and out as they please, unchecked.? Because any restriction on entry and staying in this country will require some entity to enforce the laws. And weak enforcement is just another way of saying we really aren't serious about having a border.
Posted on 2/15/26 at 10:00 am to jrobic4
That's a lot of times to be wrong
Posted on 2/15/26 at 11:31 am to Brosef Stalin
I asked ChatGPT
Without doing a deep dive that appears that they would have the right to access to counsel omfor any proceeding but that does not mean original detention
If they have already been proceeding and there are removal orders I am not entirely sure they will be entitled to further representation rather than just being removed. It would seem to be somewhat fact specific
quote:
An individual detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) does have the right to seek legal representation, but this right is not as straightforward as it is in criminal cases. Here are the details: Right to Legal Counsel Detained immigrants are allowed to have a lawyer represent them in immigration proceedings, but they are not provided one at government expense. This means that while they can hire an attorney or seek assistance from nonprofit organizations, they must cover the costs themselves. Access to legal resources: Immigration detention facilities may have resources or contacts for legal aid, and various nonprofi
Without doing a deep dive that appears that they would have the right to access to counsel omfor any proceeding but that does not mean original detention
If they have already been proceeding and there are removal orders I am not entirely sure they will be entitled to further representation rather than just being removed. It would seem to be somewhat fact specific
This post was edited on 2/15/26 at 11:34 am
Posted on 2/15/26 at 11:33 am to Chazreinhold
quote:
Court rules ICE violating Constitutional rights
A Kangaroo Court presided by a Joey rules ICE violating Constitutional rights
FIFY
Posted on 2/15/26 at 12:04 pm to Chazreinhold
So if they did show up in court to argue they overstayed their visa.....and they are standing there in court.......wouldnt that be proof they did indeed overstay 
Posted on 2/15/26 at 12:10 pm to dafif
quote:
Without doing a deep dive
Please don’t use that terminology. I just retired from public education, and that nonsense term makes me want to fight a central office supervisor.
Posted on 2/15/26 at 12:10 pm to jrobic4
quote:
ILLEGAL INVADERS DON'T HAVE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
Posted on 2/15/26 at 12:12 pm to Chazreinhold
That raises a question. Why did Trump appoint “another activist”?
Posted on 2/15/26 at 12:15 pm to Chazreinhold
quote:
Brasel, an appointee of President Donald Trump
Who recommended her.
ETA
Who TF recommended her
quote:
Born in England, Brasel earned her Bachelor of Arts from Trinity University in 1991, where she was inducted into Phi Beta Kappa, her Master of Arts from the University of Texas at Austin in 1993, and her Juris Doctor, magna cum laude, from the University of Minnesota in 1996, where she was inducted into the Order of the Coif and served as a managing editor of the Minnesota Law Review.
Born in England, from Minnesota...
quote:
Upon graduation from law school, Brasel served as a law clerk to Judge Donald P. Lay of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit from 1996 to 1997.
Lay was nominated by President Lyndon B. Johnson on July 11, 1966, to a seat on the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit vacated by Judge Harvey M. Johnsen.
TF?
quote:
In 2011, Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton (D) appointed Brasel to the Minnesota State District Court for the Fourth Judicial District in Hennepin County, where she served until becoming a federal judge. Judge Brasel is the former Chair of the Board of Directors of the Domestic Abuse Project in Minneapolis.
Why?
quote:
In 2017, Brasel was recommended to the Trump administration as a federal judge by Senator Amy Klobuchar. On February 12, 2018, President Donald Trump announced his intent to nominate Brasel to an undetermined seat on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota as part of a bipartisan package of judicial nominees which included Minneapolis lawyer Eric Tostrud.
Oh that's why...
Total leftist Trash.
This post was edited on 2/15/26 at 12:25 pm
Posted on 2/15/26 at 12:16 pm to VOR
A Trump appointee and a legit question.
Posted on 2/15/26 at 12:21 pm to Chazreinhold
quote:
ICE has an impossible task. They are responsible for enforcing US immigration laws. This includes removal of immigrants that have no legal basis for being in the country. During the previous administration, the US was the only country in the world that essentially had an open border policy. Somewhere between 8 and 21 million people entered the US through the southern border. Many of them entered as asylum-seekers and were readily let in with a pinky swear promise to attend an asylum hearing in a US court (which everybody knows will never happen, given the backlog of cases to hear). Many more people came in without even checking in at the door. We have no idea who many of these people are. We know that there are violent criminals, drug traffickers, and human traffickers, terrorists, and the like. ICE is tasked to root out the people that are here illegally. They have stated they are searching for the most violent criminals as their to priority. Rather than assist ICE in their efforts, for some reason, city, county, and state leaders across the country (mayors, governors, judges, attorneys general, and the like) are actively impeding ICE and their efforts to enforce laws. They are also riling up citizen armies to impede the enforcement of US law. Federal lawmakers are on record in support of abolishing immigration enforcement altogether. People are intent on making an impossible job even more impossible. We look for anything we can to put law enforcement at fault, instead of the law breakers. We really should put this to a vote in Washington -- do we want to get rid of our border enforcement and just let anyone come in and out as they please, unchecked.? Because any restriction on entry and staying in this country will require some entity to enforce the laws. And weak enforcement is just another way of saying we really aren't serious about having a border.
I can tell you that we have an absolutely metric F^CK TON of them up here in Massachusetts(“asylum” seekers, green cards(mostly bullshite), H1B’s, and just straight illegals.
It’s the same way in most states I bet, and until our election system is overhauled to one that is free and FAIR, the status quo continues: the Marxists are simply waiting out the clock in hopes of Dems and more corrupt Republicans to get back into office.
I want immigrants who come in the correct way and who plan to assimilate.
This post was edited on 2/15/26 at 12:22 pm
Posted on 2/15/26 at 12:21 pm to Narax
quote:
Who recommended her.
tTurtle
Posted on 2/15/26 at 12:22 pm to Chazreinhold
What is it about MN that they have so many corrupt government officials?
Posted on 2/15/26 at 12:30 pm to Chazreinhold
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News