Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us On this day in 1945, The Battle of Seelow Hights, forerunner to Battle of Berlin | O-T Lounge
Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

On this day in 1945, The Battle of Seelow Hights, forerunner to Battle of Berlin

Posted on 4/17/26 at 6:53 am
Posted by PSS101
Member since Jun 2024
1627 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 6:53 am
16-19 of April. Soviets crushed the Germans and moved to encircle Berlin
Posted by awestruck
Member since Jan 2015
14519 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 6:57 am to
While Brazilian forces liberate the town of Montese, Italy, from German Nazi forces.
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
70858 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 7:03 am to
Talk about a blood bath. Marshal Zhukov was way too overconfident in carrying out a frontal assault against an entrenched enemy on high ground. The idea was to hit the Germans with a massive artillery bombardment then hit them with spotlights to blind them to the approach of the Soviet infantry and armor columns. Problem was, there was so much smoke and dust lingering in the air from the bombardment that when the Soviets turned the spotlights on, the light reflected off the dust and back at them.

The Soviets lost between 30,000-35,000 men trying to take the heights while the Germans lost between 40,000-45,000 (most of them captured), trying to defend.
Posted by PSS101
Member since Jun 2024
1627 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 7:06 am to
you know your history. That is exactly what happened
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
73301 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 7:06 am to
Yeah. Day 1 was an unmitigated disaster for Zhukov. But he knew the German were scrapping the bottom of the barrel and all he had to do was keep battering away and their lines would collapse.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
40589 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 7:12 am to
quote:

Day 1 was an unmitigated disaster for Zhukov


This is why I laugh when people think the Soviets stood a chance against the US Army in 1945 in the usual "what ifs". The Germans were on the verge of collapse. No fuel, limited ammo, no air power, putting boys and old men at the front; yet, they killed the Russkies by the scads. What would the US Army do with its advanced artillery tactics, overwhelming air superiority, command and control, and massive material and logistics support do to the Red Army? Vaporize it.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
80436 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 8:21 am to
Steiner's assault will clear it up.
Posted by SoDakHawk
South Dakota
Member since Jun 2014
10542 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 8:35 am to
Patton thought we'd take the Russians, I think I'd agree with him.
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
149939 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 8:37 am to
quote:

The Battle of Seelow
Posted by Mstate
Birmingham
Member since Nov 2009
10510 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 8:49 am to
quote:

This is why I laugh when people think the Soviets stood a chance against the US Army in 1945 in the usual "what ifs". The Germans were on the verge of collapse. No fuel, limited ammo, no air power, putting boys and old men at the front; yet, they killed the Russkies by the scads. What would the US Army do with its advanced artillery tactics, overwhelming air superiority, command and control, and massive material and logistics support do to the Red Army? Vaporize it.


I think most people realize if the US had thrown its full might at the Soviets we would likely win. The question/problem is did we have the stomach for it right after ending the largest and most bloody war we have ever fought. I highly doubt the American public would’ve been gung ho to fight the Soviets

It’s a lot different defending your capital city to the oncoming Russian hordes who are going to pillage your people vs sending Johnny from Omaha to the Russian steppes to fight
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
40589 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 8:52 am to
Obviously, political will is always going to be the limiting factor on any American military operation.
Posted by HeadSlash
TEAM LIVE BADASS - St. GEORGE
Member since Aug 2006
55789 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:44 am to
quote:

they killed the Russkies by the scads.


Russia wasn't concerned about losing soldiers. That trend continues today.
Posted by Beauw
Blanchard
Member since Sep 2007
4180 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 10:12 am to
The MIC realized the $ they could make, and we haven’t “won” a war since.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram