Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us How many points must we score???????? | Saints Talk
Started By
Message
locked post

How many points must we score????????

Posted on 1/10/10 at 7:44 pm
Posted by redfish99
B.R.
Member since Aug 2007
18850 posts
Posted on 1/10/10 at 7:44 pm
I think we need minimum 38 points.I hope we're able to run it enough to control the clock.This game has all the makings of a repeat of what we just watched.Ball control for Saints will be crucial.
Posted by shortstop1627
shreveport
Member since Aug 2008
1272 posts
Posted on 1/10/10 at 7:45 pm to
28 will get it done watch.
Posted by guttata
prairieville
Member since Feb 2006
22645 posts
Posted on 1/10/10 at 7:46 pm to
Green Bay has alot better defense than the Saints.
Posted by catholictigerfan
Member since Oct 2009
59700 posts
Posted on 1/10/10 at 7:46 pm to
it all depends on the D if we can play D which i think we can enough to slow them down so we can beat Zona
Posted by GEAUXTIGER23
Member since Apr 2008
4893 posts
Posted on 1/10/10 at 7:49 pm to
1 more
Posted by LSU fan 246
Member since Oct 2005
90567 posts
Posted on 1/10/10 at 7:52 pm to
quote:

I think we need minimum 38 points.


you know how ridiculous that sounds?
Posted by msukb79
South Mississippi
Member since May 2009
10112 posts
Posted on 1/10/10 at 7:54 pm to
31 in my opinion.
Posted by TJG210
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2006
29306 posts
Posted on 1/10/10 at 8:01 pm to
If you can get Warner off of his game early, he is likely to unravel and become a turnover machine like Brett Favre. Hopefully Sharper has an early pick six and we never look back.
Posted by redfish99
B.R.
Member since Aug 2007
18850 posts
Posted on 1/10/10 at 8:49 pm to

you know how ridiculous that sounds?

I do............I can't help but see this game be a track meet.They have a great group of recivers,you do relize that Gay or Jenkins will be lined up across from a stud all day.Quick throws slants screens dbl moves with a HOF QB in the pocket..............Green Bay was a top 5 D against the pass who forced 40 TO's.I'll be there with the rest.................
Posted by cypresstiger
The South
Member since Aug 2008
13704 posts
Posted on 1/10/10 at 8:51 pm to
"1 more"

Exactly
Posted by GEAUXTIGER23
Member since Apr 2008
4893 posts
Posted on 1/10/10 at 9:39 pm to
Yep only need 1 more.

But it would be nice to only need 20.
This post was edited on 1/10/10 at 9:41 pm
Posted by clooneyisgod
Member since Feb 2006
7838 posts
Posted on 1/10/10 at 9:49 pm to
quote:

Green Bay has alot better defense than the Saints.


I'm not so sure about that. I remember going into the Monday Night game last year in the dome and ESPN's talking point was that Green Bay had the best pass defense in the league. And then we shredded them. They seem like one of those defenses that can get a lot of picks but otherwise can't actually stop anybody (SEE the Arizona game tonight). I think Green bay's defense was highly overrated.
Posted by LAfootballDude
Sulphur
Member since Feb 2007
2425 posts
Posted on 1/10/10 at 9:53 pm to
quote:

Green Bay has alot better defense than the Saints.


Really? they are down their starting 3 CB's and if I am not mistaken BISBY went down as well...
I think a healthy (first half of the season) saints defense is 14 to 21 points better than what we saw tonight...

That being said it all comes down to Turnovers... Can't give them a short field, Period!!! Its true for every game but even more so true next saturday night when the only stops may be due to fumbles or INTs
Posted by Flowbie
Minnesota
Member since Sep 2009
869 posts
Posted on 1/10/10 at 9:54 pm to
prob about 40

the saints dont have a charles woodson on the roster
Posted by Sammobile
Hollywood South
Member since Jan 2009
22413 posts
Posted on 1/10/10 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

the saints dont have a charles woodson on the roster

true but Greer and Porter are a very nice combo


and the Pack didn't have a Will Smith on theirs either
Posted by clooneyisgod
Member since Feb 2006
7838 posts
Posted on 1/10/10 at 9:59 pm to
quote:

the saints dont have a charles woodson on the roster


That dude is 5 years passed his prime. I think he's ridiculously overrated. Interceptions do not necessarily indicate solid coverage skills. Not totally unlike Darren Sharper.
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
34984 posts
Posted on 1/10/10 at 10:12 pm to
quote:

Green Bay has alot better defense than the Saints.


why do you even come here?
Posted by saintsrow
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
681 posts
Posted on 1/10/10 at 10:20 pm to
This Saints defense should be ok to contain Arizona to sub 30s if they tackle well and communicate really well.

Coaches pull out all the stops at this time of year, and the calls coming in are some of the ones on the last page of the playbook. God, it'll be great to have that defense healthy again. I'm also happy that Grant isn't playing.
Posted by THRILLHO
Metry, LA
Member since Apr 2006
50278 posts
Posted on 1/10/10 at 10:24 pm to
quote:

the saints dont have a charles woodson on the roster


LINK

Greer isn't exactly far off.
Posted by efrad
Member since Nov 2007
18702 posts
Posted on 1/11/10 at 12:33 am to
Stop melting down, people. Yes, Arizona scored a frickton of points tonight. They're also only averaged like 23 points this season. We will be okay if our good defense shows up next week.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram