- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
LSU's defense will allow an average of 18 points/game in 2010..
Posted on 2/24/10 at 11:26 pm
Posted on 2/24/10 at 11:26 pm
True or False
9
Posted on 2/24/10 at 11:27 pm to Rocket
less
Posted on 2/24/10 at 11:28 pm to Rocket
I say true because it will be bend but don't break defense but LSU won't score much either
Posted on 2/24/10 at 11:32 pm to Rocket
It would be a better over and under question.
I'll say over due to inexperience at many positions, tougher OOC schedule, and better offenses in our division.
I'll say over due to inexperience at many positions, tougher OOC schedule, and better offenses in our division.
Posted on 2/24/10 at 11:34 pm to wahoocs
what I'm hoping for this year is if LSU can actually sustain some drives to let the defense rest
Posted on 2/24/10 at 11:38 pm to KingwoodLsuFan
The best defense is a ball controlled offense.
Given our ability to play pitch and catch, run block and pass protect, I'm going to go out on a limb and say with little returning experience at the WR and RB positions, we won't sustain many more drives this year compared to the last.
Given our ability to play pitch and catch, run block and pass protect, I'm going to go out on a limb and say with little returning experience at the WR and RB positions, we won't sustain many more drives this year compared to the last.
Posted on 2/24/10 at 11:40 pm to wahoocs
ug I hate bend but dont break defenses on a team that can't sustain drives. Such a bad combo.
Posted on 2/24/10 at 11:46 pm to wahoocs
I'm not feeling good about this season right now.
Posted on 2/24/10 at 11:49 pm to Rocket
yep
Posted on 2/24/10 at 11:51 pm to filmmaker45
I say true but only because I believe they take a step back this year. Some of their turnovers do not turn into touchdowns and they do not force as many turnovers as the previous season.
Posted on 2/24/10 at 11:56 pm to Rocket
quote:
I'm not feeling good about this season right now.
Im not worried about the defense. Basically where we got hit most is at LB. However we have a LB specialist in Chavis and he will make them a good unit (plus big things are expected from Baker anyway).
The DL did not produce much last year and the best player at each position is back imo in Nevis at DT and Edwards at DE. We have a lot of talented young guys ready to take on bigger roles.
The secondary is a strength despite CJ leaving. Great corner combo and enough talent at safety that makes me confident whoever wins the jobs will be very good.
To sum up: we'll be fine on D and the offense can only go up. Cheer up
Posted on 2/24/10 at 11:57 pm to Rocket
False
It will be less than that. I have a good feeling about this year.
It will be less than that. I have a good feeling about this year.
Posted on 2/24/10 at 11:58 pm to themunch
I will feel a lot better if a rb steps up
Posted on 2/25/10 at 12:01 am to Waldo
Right now, true. I think the defense is solid, but if our offense fails like it did last year, they won't stop anybody major in conference, not to mention WVU.
If we can move the ball like a BCS school, our defense could easily allow less than 18 per game.
If we can move the ball like a BCS school, our defense could easily allow less than 18 per game.
Posted on 2/25/10 at 12:10 am to Rocket
I will take the over
Posted on 2/25/10 at 7:28 am to Rocket
Where did the Saints D finish this past year?
No, don't turn this comment into something it's not. The D just needs to be opportunistic.
No, don't turn this comment into something it's not. The D just needs to be opportunistic.
Posted on 2/25/10 at 7:33 am to Rocket
I'll say under. The D-line should be better, I think Chavis will do a good job with the young LBs, and the secondary will be about the same or maybe slightly better.
I'm much more concerned about the offense next year, but seriously, how much worse can it get? If it gets any better at all it will help the D by keeping them off the field more than they were in 2009.
I'm much more concerned about the offense next year, but seriously, how much worse can it get? If it gets any better at all it will help the D by keeping them off the field more than they were in 2009.
Posted on 2/25/10 at 7:39 am to LSUME86
Outside of Bama and Arkansas, what team will be that much better of offense? I say this due to most teams we play will be breaking in a new QB. Unless you have an outstanding running game I think a new QB hurts.
I think our defense will be fine.
I think our defense will be fine.
Posted on 2/25/10 at 8:02 am to wahoocs
quote:tell that to Charlie Weis. ND was in top 10 of T.O.P. during his tenure, and his defenses still lost him games.
The best defense is a ball controlled offense.
The best defense is a good defense.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News