Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Movie 43: 6% on RT | Movie/TV Board
Started By
Message
locked post

Movie 43: 6% on RT

Posted on 1/26/13 at 10:27 am
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 10:27 am
You knew it was going to be awful when they didn't pre-screen the film to any critics.

Richard Roper called it the "Citizen Kane of awful". Just read his review. He destroyed it: LINK

I know it was supposed to be that unspeakable crude film, but this doesn't even sound funny.
Posted by R2Z2
Member since Dec 2012
115 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 10:30 am to
Saw it. A few things worked (Terrence Howard was in the best sketch; Emma Watson was good; couple of fake ads). Most of it was gross out humor that really didn't work.

Felt like the whole thing was made by stoned people. Everything is funny when you're high.

But it really wasn't.
Posted by townhallsavoy
Member since Oct 2007
3045 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 10:38 am to
I read somewhere (I think from a director that did an AMA on Reddit) that one of the best moments in the film was Halle Berry putting her boob in a bowl of guacamole.

6% may be too high.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 10:43 am to
Honestly, films with 10,000 plots and actors should just be banned. This looks unbelievably terrible, and will certainly never watch it.
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 10:48 am to
It gets worse. Berry also supposedly sticks a turkey baster with extra hot sauce...yeah, you know.
Posted by brewhan davey
Audubon Place
Member since Sep 2010
33310 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 10:58 am to
Way too many story lines for one movie.
Posted by brewhan davey
Audubon Place
Member since Sep 2010
33310 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 10:59 am to
quote:

Felt like the whole thing was made by stoned people. Everything is funny when you're high.

But it really wasn't.


Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
67863 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 11:06 am to
Holy frick
Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
52192 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 11:10 am to
RT hates movies like this anyway.
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 11:15 am to
Read the reviews, though. A few reviewers are like "I like the lewd comedies when they have good plot, character development, etc..."
Posted by Rittdog
Yesterday, all my troubles seemed
Member since Oct 2009
9955 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 11:47 am to
Lets be real...
Doesnt it look like something from the makers of "Disaster Movie", "Epic Movie", "Date Movie" and what other crap from Jason Friedberg/ Adam Seltzer.

Posted by shuke33
Under The Bridge
Member since Nov 2010
9052 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 11:55 am to
quote:

Way too many story lines for one movie.


Isn't that the whole point of a sketch comedy film?
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
104585 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 12:00 pm to
Damn, I was looking forward to it, too.
Posted by Tom Sawyer
North Carolina
Member since Oct 2012
1001 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

Farrelly would bring in a director, and they'd shoot a scene. Unfortunately, the shooting was never fatal


My sides.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

RT hates movies like this anyway.


If by that you mean shitty movies, then yeah they do.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
63926 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

Doesnt it look like something from the makers of "Disaster Movie", "Epic Movie", "Date Movie" and what other crap from Jason Friedberg/ Adam Seltzer.
It looks more like that piece of shite movie that has Vince the Sham Wow guy in it.
Posted by SouljaBreauxTellEm
Mizz
Member since Aug 2009
29343 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 12:38 pm to
They are pretty rough on comedy to begin with.

Surely it can't be that bad. Maybe it is. I'll have to check it out and see for myself.
Posted by Murray
Member since Aug 2008
14819 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

I'll have to check it out and see for myself.
Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
68065 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

They are pretty rough on comedy to begin with.

Surely it can't be that bad. Maybe it is. I'll have to check it out and see for myself.



Read a pretty bad review today in the NYT (they're actually not too snooty when it comes to comedies). Just said it was trying too hard for gross out humor and misses the mark more times than not.
Posted by Murray
Member since Aug 2008
14819 posts
Posted on 1/26/13 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

Just said it was trying too hard for gross out humor and misses the mark more times than not.


I could see that but comedy is way too subjective for me to take any critic's word for it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram