Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us The Martian | Movie/TV Board
Started By
Message

The Martian

Posted on 10/2/15 at 9:42 am
Posted by Cruiserhog
Little Rock
Member since Apr 2008
10460 posts
Posted on 10/2/15 at 9:42 am
Closing up my shop for the morning and taking the guys to see the Martian

will report back in about 3 hours.
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 10/2/15 at 9:56 am to
I'll probably see this today or Monday.
Posted by Wooly
Member since Feb 2012
13851 posts
Posted on 10/2/15 at 9:58 am to
Seeing it today, hopefully it's a solid kickoff to my birthday weekend. Let me know if the 3d is any good
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53067 posts
Posted on 10/2/15 at 9:58 am to
Saw it....not sure how to rate it.

Its not a bad film, but I am stuck comparing it to the book.

They missed big time on the humor element of the book IMO. Flashes of it was there, but they skipped a lot of it.

MILD SPOILERS





While I expected them not to be able to cover the science of what he was doing and the factors of his situation, they took it a step further and whitewashed pretty much ALL of his struggles. As far as I can tell, the only problem Mark had other than isolation was having to endure disco. No problems or issues other than that. Pretty much twiddling his thumbs waiting for time to pass.

No trial and error to figure out how to manufacture enough water. No cowering in the rover for days as he realized that he fricked up and turned the whole Hab atmosphere to hydrogen.

The trip to the MAV was the worst....no dust storm and no tumble of the rover. No loss of communication to NASA due to a momment of dumbassery. It was literally just a 5 minute montage across Mars. They spent more airtime to bring up the whole space pirate crap in multiple situations than to any problem. Even when they insinuate a problem with their earth bound testing, it never really materializes in any form in practice.

I've seen joy rides with more stress than what he suffered on his long trip to the crater. Hell, at least half of the 5 minute montage of the trip was showing him just chilling and sleeping.

Apparently that was his biggest problem on the trip: the boredom.

Even with the included Hab breach, they toned down the danger. He didn't pull a miracle out of his arse after recovering. Nah...just slap some ducttape on his suit, and he is good to take a leisurely stroll, checking out plants and stuff, before getting a new helmet and calmly walking back to the rover.


I know the run time was 2 hours and therefore things had to be cut.

But the whole story is that of survival on such a harsh and inhospitable world. Gimme SOME adversity. frick.

I'll give the movie this though: its ending is far superior to the book ending of "I reek to an absurdly shocking degree but hey, all of humanity worked together to bring me home so we are all okay"
This post was edited on 10/2/15 at 10:11 am
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 10/2/15 at 10:04 am to
Seems I just missed a perfect 1015 showtime...I mean...nearly missed.
Posted by BigturboSRTboy
Augusta GA
Member since Apr 2009
195 posts
Posted on 10/2/15 at 10:06 am to
To sum it up, cast away on mars.
This post was edited on 10/2/15 at 10:06 am
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
38281 posts
Posted on 10/2/15 at 10:08 am to
quote:

To sum it up, cast away on mars.


Nah. More Apollo 13 than Cast Away.
Posted by FootballNostradamus
Member since Nov 2009
20509 posts
Posted on 10/2/15 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

They missed big time on the humor element of the book IMO. Flashes of it was there, but they skipped a lot of it.


Ugh

quote:

While I expected them not to be able to cover the science of what he was doing and the factors of his situation, they took it a step further and whitewashed pretty much ALL of his struggles. As far as I can tell, the only problem Mark had other than isolation was having to endure disco. No problems or issues other than that. Pretty much twiddling his thumbs waiting for time to pass.

No trial and error to figure out how to manufacture enough water. No cowering in the rover for days as he realized that he fricked up and turned the whole Hab atmosphere to hydrogen.


Ugh ugh

quote:

The trip to the MAV was the worst....no dust storm and no tumble of the rover. No loss of communication to NASA due to a momment of dumbassery. It was literally just a 5 minute montage across Mars. They spent more airtime to bring up the whole space pirate crap in multiple situations than to any problem. Even when they insinuate a problem with their earth bound testing, it never really materializes in any form in practice.

I've seen joy rides with more stress than what he suffered on his long trip to the crater. Hell, at least half of the 5 minute montage of the trip was showing him just chilling and sleeping.



WTF?!?!

quote:

Apparently that was his biggest problem on the trip: the boredom.


Fvck this movie

Dammit I'm depressed as shite right now.

Like someone said, this is supposed to be Apollo 13 on Mars not fvcking Castaway.
Posted by 3nOut
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Jan 2013
32217 posts
Posted on 10/2/15 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

They missed big time on the humor element of the book IMO. Flashes of it was there, but they skipped a lot of it.




THIS IS EXACTLY WHY I WAS MAD THEY CAST DAMON.



the dude can be funny in some things like Oceans 11, but Mark Watney was hilarious and dripped sarcasm.

Should have been Pratt, despite his oversaturation right now.
Posted by GeauxTigers2020
Member since Sep 2013
28667 posts
Posted on 10/2/15 at 1:49 pm to
Disclaimer: I didn't read the book so I don't know how it compares.

Best thing Ridley Scott or Damon have done in a while. Was surprisingly funny. Visually it was beautiful.


There was one line of a dialogue/foreshadowing that was so cliche it caused me to cringe. Other than that, I had few complaints.
Posted by Cruiserhog
Little Rock
Member since Apr 2008
10460 posts
Posted on 10/2/15 at 1:56 pm to
I have not read the book so...

Enjoyed it...had a nice pace but I have to agree with Volvagia....

show abit more of the life threatening decisions
Posted by Evolve
Texas
Member since Aug 2012
3407 posts
Posted on 10/2/15 at 2:22 pm to
Read the book. Saw the movie last night. As with almost any book/movie the book is way better. This is true in this case as well. However, the movie is really well done, and very entertaining. In concept it is similar to cast away, but has much more pace, humor, and content to work with. I really enjoyed the movie, and the book is really a great read.
Posted by The Egg
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2004
83583 posts
Posted on 10/2/15 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

There was one line of a dialogue/foreshadowing that was so cliche it caused me to cringe.
let me guess.
Posted by gpburdell
ATL
Member since Jun 2015
1589 posts
Posted on 10/3/15 at 12:47 am to
Just saw it. Didn't read the book, but I loved the movie. I was engaged the whole time and no parts of it felt slow. When it was over, I had no idea it was over 2.5 hours.

One of the best I've seen in awhile. I plan to read the book and buy the blu ray.
Posted by auburn32
Auburn
Member since Dec 2009
2510 posts
Posted on 10/3/15 at 6:46 am to
I liked the movie a lot, but I think I would have liked it more if I hadn't read the book or watched any previews.
Posted by lsufan112001
sportsmans paradise
Member since Oct 2006
11204 posts
Posted on 10/3/15 at 7:39 am to
I'd give it a solid 3.5 stars. It had good pace so the movie didn't seem to be that long
Posted by DirtyMikeandtheBoys
Member since May 2011
19467 posts
Posted on 10/3/15 at 9:38 am to
Movie's a POS. As anticipated Scott/Damon completely fricked what could have been a great film.

1. It was nothing like Apollo 13 or Castaway. If it had been it would have been better. Apollo 13 was constant stress overload and science. Castaway was a brilliant character study on isolation. The book incorporates major elements of both scenarios and the movie didn't accomplish either.

2. I'm pretty sure the only actor that did somewhat of a good job with their character was Ejiofor. Although other characters were so glossed over it's probably more of an indictment on Scott than the actors. Daniels was trash though

3. Why'd they make the already rushed ending from the book, also unbelievable?

4/10
Posted by Wooly
Member since Feb 2012
13851 posts
Posted on 10/3/15 at 10:20 am to
So after seeing this movie I have the following thoughts.

I always thought people who said "the book is sooo much better" were pretentious arse hats. But after reading the book and finishing it 2 nights before seeing the movie, I am said pretentious arse hat.

They left out too much stuff imo.


Spoilers:






















I didn't like how they completely skipped the fact that he broke pathfinder. And they completely left out the dust storm while driving to ares 4, and the accident on the way.

The whole part where he explains why he is a space pirate doesn't make sense in the movie because in the movie he never lost contact with nasa, so they did order him to take the mav, so that part only makes sense in the book
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 10/3/15 at 11:47 am to
Great movie...probably in my top 5. My wife loved it because there wasn't a single car chase :P
Posted by Patrick_Bateman
Member since Jan 2012
17823 posts
Posted on 10/3/15 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

Great movie...probably in my top 5.

Ever?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram