- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Veto Worthy?
Posted on 10/19/17 at 9:39 pm
Posted on 10/19/17 at 9:39 pm
M Gordon for Cooper/Montgomery, standard league. Seems lopsided to me but I'm not big on vetoing trades based on stupidity. Does this seem like collusion or just poor management? The guy trading away Gordon is 2-4 and his team is garbage, not sure if this is a desperation move or purposeful. Thoughts?
Edit: thanks for the feedback - not gonna veto
Edit: thanks for the feedback - not gonna veto
This post was edited on 10/20/17 at 8:30 am
Posted on 10/19/17 at 9:40 pm to BigOrangeVols
Seems like a fair 2 for 1 deal
Posted on 10/19/17 at 9:40 pm to BigOrangeVols
Only outright collusion should be vetoed. This almost certainly isn’t that.
This post was edited on 10/19/17 at 9:41 pm
Posted on 10/19/17 at 9:40 pm to BigOrangeVols
I mean, it's a trade I wouldn't make, but not enough to show collusion. Let it through.
Posted on 10/19/17 at 9:43 pm to BigOrangeVols
If you veto that trade you’re in a vag league. Let people run their teams how they want
Posted on 10/19/17 at 9:44 pm to BigOrangeVols
Sounds like trade envy
Posted on 10/19/17 at 9:47 pm to BigOrangeVols
trying to figure out which side is winning big over here
Posted on 10/19/17 at 10:26 pm to BigOrangeVols
Collusion is the only reason for veto no matter how lopsided a trade is
Posted on 10/19/17 at 10:27 pm to TigerTatorTots
But that’s not even all that lopsided. Guy is 2-4 and bought low on what could be two studs or one and an RB2
Hell I bet the guy that gave cooper is pissed right now
Hell I bet the guy that gave cooper is pissed right now
Posted on 10/19/17 at 10:35 pm to BigOrangeVols
I don't even think that it's a bad trade, let alone veto worthy. I was trying to figure out which side you didn't like. I'll also throw out the "veto only for collusion... yadayadayada..."
This post was edited on 10/19/17 at 10:37 pm
Posted on 10/19/17 at 11:00 pm to BilJ
Correct, not lopsided at all. OP is dumb
Posted on 10/19/17 at 11:03 pm to BigOrangeVols
I hate vetos. I had a good trade with another league member and it was vetoed 3 times. No collusion and we both thought the trade helped us out.
Vetos are an abomination. Does that answer your question?
Vetos are an abomination. Does that answer your question?
Posted on 10/19/17 at 11:05 pm to DeionDeion
Vetos are for jealous, butthurt pussies
Posted on 10/19/17 at 11:10 pm to DeionDeion
I would throw a fit. In fact I did a few years ago when a few a-hole members of my league veto'd a trade, and the explicit reason one of them gave was that it made my team too good. I threatened to quit the league, and meant it, and they backed down from it. It ended up that I would have been better off without making the trade, so that shows their crystal ball must have been broken. Anyway, I wouldn't tolerate that. If they veto'd a trade that wasn't collusion and wouldn't listen to reason then I would quit.
Posted on 10/19/17 at 11:13 pm to Peazey
quote:
I would throw a fit. In fact I did a few years ago when a few a-hole members of my league veto'd a trade, and the explicit reason one of them gave was that it made my team too good.
the exact reason my trade got vetoed. this happen over a week ago and I'm still fuming over it. its the classic childish logic of "if I can't have that, then no one can"
I won't quit my league but I'm not going to lie I've still got smoke coming out of my ears. Both me and the other trade partner are planning on vetoing every trade that comes down the pipe now
This post was edited on 10/19/17 at 11:18 pm
Popular
Back to top

10









