- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/10/15 at 11:52 am to TTownTiger
I agree about adding DL spots. That would help.
but i dont think you should be able to stash DL guys in the offseason
I was dead in the water because of injuries this year.
but i dont think you should be able to stash DL guys in the offseason
I was dead in the water because of injuries this year.
This post was edited on 8/10/15 at 11:53 am
Posted on 8/10/15 at 11:52 am to TTownTiger
quote:
Roster size isn't an issue, imo. I think it's DL size that can be increased and I was going to propose that this offseason. Just increasing DL spots from 3 to 5 would open up available lineup spots for those teams that need it. Let's face it, you can easily get screwed if you have more than 3 guys on the DL and none of them have MiLB eligibility left.
My suggestion for this was to not have a limit for the number of guys you can have on the DL. The only requirement is that the player has to actually be on your team when he got hurt. You aren't allowed to add injured players to your roster for the purpose of stashing.
Posted on 8/10/15 at 11:52 am to Lester Earl
Basically just the close interaction many owners have with each other in this league. No real example pops into my head.
Like I've been saying, I'm just concerned that since some aren't as familiar with the overseers, they won't be given the same leeway.
But since I've made my point, whether it be right or wrong, I'm sure everyone will be treated fairly.
Like I've been saying, I'm just concerned that since some aren't as familiar with the overseers, they won't be given the same leeway.
But since I've made my point, whether it be right or wrong, I'm sure everyone will be treated fairly.
Posted on 8/10/15 at 11:53 am to papz
quote:
and even rondo, who's surprised me,
you guys let Redd's unabashed unmerited hatred get the best of you...
Posted on 8/10/15 at 11:53 am to reddman
quote:
Not against the rules.
K
There was a huge push in other leagues to ensure guys like JewT filled an optimal lineup. I would like to propose this rule for this league starting next season.
I didnt even notcie Earl has Jenry Mejia in his lineup too.
Posted on 8/10/15 at 11:54 am to MrWiseGuy
well i like a few, some are just there, and there are a few that are pretty disliked. Im sure they'd say the same about TBM
Posted on 8/10/15 at 11:54 am to rondo
quote:
rondo
Each time there has been a ruling to be made so far in this league, I have agreed with your opinion 100%
Posted on 8/10/15 at 11:54 am to papz
quote:
hether one chooses to acknowledge it or not, there is a double standard when it comes to these things amongst the "regulars". I've always felt that way as well.
now you know how Ian feels when it comes to his parents treating of him and his siblings
Posted on 8/10/15 at 11:54 am to Lester Earl
quote:
fwiw i dislike more regulars than i like.

Posted on 8/10/15 at 11:56 am to MrWiseGuy
quote:
I have agreed with your opinion 100%
fair and balanced
Posted on 8/10/15 at 11:56 am to reddman
Going back to roll not hitting his innings minimum this week, is it a fantrax bug that he won era and whip and tied s+h? Because all pitching should be forfeited right?
This post was edited on 8/10/15 at 11:57 am
Posted on 8/10/15 at 11:56 am to Lester Earl
quote:
Im sure they'd say the same about TBM
I have always been a fan of TBM FWIW
Posted on 8/10/15 at 11:59 am to OneMoreTime
quote:
Going back to roll not hitting his innings minimum this week, is it a fantrax bug that he won era and whip and tied s+h? Because all pitching should be forfeited right?
Just the ratio categories
Posted on 8/10/15 at 11:59 am to MrWiseGuy
I've played with these dudes for awhile, just know I wouldn't let them get away with any favoritism without calling them out on it
Posted on 8/10/15 at 12:01 pm to MrWiseGuy
Well this is what the rules say
quote:
3. Teams not meeting the weekly pitching requirements will forfeit all pitching stats for the week.
Posted on 8/10/15 at 12:01 pm to reddman
quote:
quote:
My suggestion for this was to not have a limit for the number of guys you can have on the DL. The only requirement is that the player has to actually be on your team when he got hurt. You aren't allowed to add injured players to your roster for the purpose of stashing.
I think that kind of a rule change suggestion would probably pass league vote unanimously..
Posted on 8/10/15 at 12:01 pm to GynoSandberg
It's been 4 years or so already and I still don't know what TBM means. What does this stand for?
Posted on 8/10/15 at 12:02 pm to GynoSandberg
All I'm concerned about. Not trying to ruffle feathers, Redd
Posted on 8/10/15 at 12:04 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
Fantrax monitors DL guys. Sometimes they are a day off. You cannot make moves if you have an active guy still on your DL
I was actually talking about you in regards to Utley. Im aware of all the above, just the actual rule on the webpage is really vague.
Popular
Back to top



0





