- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: A mobile QB is better for RPO
Posted on 4/28/22 at 9:58 pm to sabes que
Posted on 4/28/22 at 9:58 pm to sabes que
I don’t even really know how these points y’all are trying to make have anything to do with our current situation.
I guess you’re trying to say Myles won’t be a NFL caliber QB. I really don’t care. It still doesn’t mean he’s not the best option. Don’t underestimate how important decision making and ball protection are to Kelly. And he can get the ball down the field. Mac did it. Myles can do it. There are other factors besides athleticism.
If Kelly didn’t think he could run his offense, he wouldn’t be here.
I guess you’re trying to say Myles won’t be a NFL caliber QB. I really don’t care. It still doesn’t mean he’s not the best option. Don’t underestimate how important decision making and ball protection are to Kelly. And he can get the ball down the field. Mac did it. Myles can do it. There are other factors besides athleticism.
If Kelly didn’t think he could run his offense, he wouldn’t be here.
This post was edited on 4/28/22 at 10:00 pm
Posted on 4/28/22 at 10:08 pm to lostinbr
Name the top 7 NFL QBs, how many are mobile?
Posted on 4/28/22 at 10:18 pm to sabes que
I mean it’s not that hard to go back and see what you said and how I responded. But OK. Doesn’t sound like there’s much reason to continue arguing then. 
Posted on 4/28/22 at 10:24 pm to lostinbr
Me and the dude were joking around about Brady having Lamar’s athleticism. I committed that the modern great QBz like Burrow and Allen are mobile
Posted on 4/29/22 at 5:09 am to sabes que
quote:
sabes que
Do you even watch football?
Posted on 4/29/22 at 7:30 am to sabes que
Posted on 4/29/22 at 8:00 am to sabes que
another football ignorant ranter as always
the read for a RPO and the read for a ZONE READ/READ OPTION are both different reads.
here read this and educate yourself clown
Posted on 4/29/22 at 8:32 am to Fat Bastard
quote:
the read for a RPO and the read for a ZONE READ/READ OPTION are both different reads.
here read this and educate yourself clown
Ennnnh the 1st level RPO and Read Option are kind of the same play. I can run any run concept away from the multiple WR side and bubble the inside receiver. Or I can run a quick screen with the outside receiver. I read the end man on the line for the give/keep, and if I keep I can read the man covering the slot for to decide if I'm running or throwing it out to the bubble. This would be a Jayden Daniels kind of play and still falls under the RPO umbrella, even through its technically a triple option play. You can turn it into a 2nd level RPO simply by changing the read to the backside LB and having the slot run a slant and OR run a 5 and in. Point being: RPO can be run on all three levels of the defense.
Playaction is hard to distinguish if the QB shows a read action, which is almost always the case in an RPO offense. RPO plays won't have a #2 or #3 progression, even with 3rd level RPOs. So if a QB pulls it down and runs when there's no pressure, it's usually because the read wasn't there.
This post was edited on 4/29/22 at 10:37 am
Posted on 4/29/22 at 10:29 am to sabes que
quote:
A mobile QB is better for RPO
And grass is green.
Posted on 4/29/22 at 12:16 pm to GEAUX5
quote:
THE “R” IN RPO MEANS RUN FOR THE RUNNING BACK. ZONE READ OPTION AND RPO ARE DIFFERENT PLAY CONCEPTS.
This should be the subtitle to Tiger Rant
Posted on 4/29/22 at 12:19 pm to sabes que
How do so little of our fans not understand what an “RPO” is?
Popular
Back to top


0






