- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 4/11/19 at 6:05 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
He was following advice of counsel. It was sound advice. That FACT is not really even debatable.
The FACT that his counsel is now saying take the meeting shows precisely that his previous counsel was misguided.
quote:
FKing's plan for inclusion of outside, adversarial parties to participate in a WW meeting via conference call was inexcusably stupid.
It was self-preservation. The man is not well liked in areas outside of athletics, he wants to maintain plausible deniability in all this. It's a tar baby his tenure at LSU can't really afford.
quote:
It was/is so witless that by itself it should raise questions as to whether FKing is qualified to remain in his job.
That's just it, it's not by itself. His being exposed as knowing about violations and not reporting them immediately would be the end of him. His bumbling a coach firing is a trifle - he's already proven that.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 6:05 pm to xiv
quote:a quality you share with Ross Dellenger, Pat Forde, Pete Thamel and Dan Wetzel
I’ve never been a journalist.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 6:11 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:Excuse me. Is Wade still slated to testify on the same subject in Federal proceedings? Is the "meeting" slated to include outside and potentially adversarial parties and/or their attorneys over a speakerphone? Is Wade going to attend a meeting with attorneys of other parties, but without his own counsel present?
The FACT that his counsel is now saying take the meeting
No?
Yeah, I didn't think so.
You are far better than this WT.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 6:12 pm to tigerfan0082
quote:
Always, always listen to your legal counsel. Period. End of story.
Not all lawyers are created equal...some give much better and more effective advice than others. So, always listen to good lawyer's advice.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 6:12 pm to Irish LSU Fan
No they aren’t. You keep spreading rumors and lies and it’s fricking bullshite the TD admins haven’t banned you yet.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 6:14 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Wonder why he got newcouncil and is now going to talk?
He still has his others
Posted on 4/11/19 at 6:17 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:It was befuddled incompetence . . . at best.
It was self-preservation.
quote:Then the choice was to let Alleva do his goddamn job/. Let Alleva find out what he could in a one-on-one meeting with Wade. Then pass that info on to FKing and whomever else the feckless fking nitwit decided to include in the conversation.
The man is not well liked in areas outside of athletics, he wants to maintain plausible deniability in all this
Posted on 4/11/19 at 6:21 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Is Wade going to attend a meeting with attorneys of other parties, but without his own counsel present?
I have. It's not that big of a deal if you maintain control of your faculties.
quote:
You are far better than this WT.
Indeed.
OR
Wade's counsel could've been negotiating the terms of the meeting a long time ago instead of a flat refusal to meet. Hard evidence can't be found that LSU knew of violations and didn't report them immediately.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 6:26 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
You ever attended a meeting without your legal counsel, with your boss and his legal counsel, a third party and their counsel, all while you’re a witness in a federal case that they want you to talk about?
No you haven’t. Shut up.
No you haven’t. Shut up.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 6:27 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:That "flat refusal" was contingent on legal lay-of-land at the time as well as FKing-Alleva's flat refusal to meet without impossible stipulations attached. By all accounts, Wade agreed to an initial meeting.
instead of a flat refusal to meet.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 6:34 pm to Irish LSU Fan
You sound like a little bitch boy
Posted on 4/11/19 at 6:36 pm to Irish LSU Fan
Yep. Fuk the idiots with an agenda. He got bad advice from an inexperienced attorney in these matters
Posted on 4/11/19 at 6:37 pm to Irish LSU Fan
How do you know what his contract specifically states?
Posted on 4/11/19 at 6:38 pm to More beer please
I have attended a meeting with a second party and their counsel, over a federal lawsuit, without counsel.
Just one time I have attended a meeting in front of counsel without counsel. You just stick to your guns.
Beyond that, why has it taken so long for Wade's counsel to get him in a meeting?
Just one time I have attended a meeting in front of counsel without counsel. You just stick to your guns.
Beyond that, why has it taken so long for Wade's counsel to get him in a meeting?
Posted on 4/11/19 at 6:38 pm to Irish LSU Fan
It was never about just attending a meeting. It was a trap.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 6:43 pm to Irish LSU Fan
RA'd for spam.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 6:44 pm to Irish LSU Fan
quote:
WW violated his contract by refusing to cooperate (attend a meeting).
Since you ignored it the first time, I’ll ask again. What does him still having a job say about this statement? I won’t hold my breath for a response.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 6:48 pm to Irish LSU Fan
quote:
Irish
Feck off. You’re a disgrace to MY Island.
Here is a song JUST for you:
Bugger Off
This post was edited on 4/11/19 at 6:52 pm
Posted on 4/11/19 at 6:50 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
That "flat refusal" was contingent on legal lay-of-land at the time as well as FKing-Alleva's flat refusal to meet without impossible stipulations attached. By all accounts, Wade agreed to an initial meeting.
They weren't impossible stipulations, they were an overabundance of caution. LSU can't find out about violations in a meeting from which the minutes could be subpoenaed. At least not before the NCAA does.
All I'm really saying is that there's a rational explanation for just about everything that has happened to this point. No one has really done anything surprising or out of the ordinary - especially when you consider the extraordinary circumstances that have led to all this, which is how I would characterize a federal wire tap.
Page 5 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News