- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Correcting some important information in the Will Wade situation
Posted on 3/16/19 at 2:58 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 3/16/19 at 2:58 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
kinda think his emotional outbursts are cute, in a condescending sort of way.
Says the guy that calls people “motherfricker” while attempting to drop grammar (and “emotional”) checks on people any time he can’t respond, including this very page:
quote:
What kind of language is this? Grammar motherfricker...
It’s the “cutest” when the posts he’s desperate to respond to are grammatically correct
This post was edited on 3/16/19 at 3:02 pm
Posted on 3/16/19 at 3:00 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I can look at this situation outside of the Duke situation.
"Besides your husband being assassinated, how did you enjoy the play Mrs. Lincoln?"
Posted on 3/16/19 at 3:01 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
The duty of the officers isn't to protect Will Wade, it's to protect LSU.
I'm sorry but you cannot separate the two. Until WW is fired WW is LSU from an NCAA perspective.
Posted on 3/16/19 at 3:01 pm to lsutiger2010
quote:
Every college basketball program that has success is slimy. Don't be dense.
Most college head coaches are separated from the slime.
I don't think this ends well for KU, or Arizona.
Posted on 3/16/19 at 3:02 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
LSU invited the NCAA to be present
Did NCAA do this for every school associated with the pay for play leaks?? If not then LSU SHOULD CALL THEIR BLUFF. If UNC didn’t get the “lack of institutional control” hammer after they were caught in the grade/class scandal then LSU isn’t going to get it for this situation.
Posted on 3/16/19 at 3:03 pm to bencoleman
quote:
Can you point to any of my posts that could be considered. "Damage control"
Thank you.
My bad Ben.
I deleted the post you replied to because I was wrong to quote a post with your name in it and reply with my response.
While I'm not entirely disowning the comment, your name should not have been mentioned in conjunction with it and I apologize for that.
It wasn't meant as an attack on you personally.
It was poor judgment to post that comment alongside that quote.
Posted on 3/16/19 at 3:04 pm to RogerTheShrubber
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/19/21 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 3/16/19 at 3:04 pm to GumboPot
quote:
I'm sorry but you cannot separate the two.
What?
If this was the case, no coaches would ever be fired.
Posted on 3/16/19 at 3:05 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
The administration did what most competent people would have done considering all the circumstances.
No, you are dead-arse wrong here.
The administration only had to lay low. Not comment about it at all to the media. Take the brunt of the media pressure. Support your coach through the season. Wait until the trial is over. Then... after the trial, after Wade has testified, call him in to discuss. If you don't like what he has to say, then fire him. Pretty fricking simple.
Posted on 3/16/19 at 3:05 pm to Revelator
quote:
"Besides your husband being assassinated, how did you enjoy the play Mrs. Lincoln?"
That would only make sense if The Duke situation would have happened at LSU and involved Will Wade.
Posted on 3/16/19 at 3:10 pm to Lester Earl
So he has the right to not talk to them and plead the 5th during the entire meeting, but he still should have met with them to plead the 5th to every question? And if that’s what Wade would have done, he wouldn’t be suspended today?

This post was edited on 3/16/19 at 3:17 pm
Posted on 3/16/19 at 3:11 pm to Tammany Tom
quote:
Lester continually defends the administration that you want gone. lol He continually attacks a coach that we all want to stay.
The bottom line here that has clearly been stated numerous times is:
It was beyond stupid for the Administration to try to force a meeting with Wade right now. Beyond stupid!!!!
Face up to the media pressure, withstand the initial blast. Let Wade coach the team through the SEC and NCAA tournaments. Let the national media whine and bitch, support your coach, until the season ends.
Wait until the trial in April. Let Wade testify. Then.... AFTER the trial, call Wade in to talk about everything.
It's a pretty simple strategy.
Hopefully his message is catching on. It seems the media currently reporting on this manner cannot think this deep. They will be forced to see it eventually because it makes too much logical sense.
Furthermore, not only is F King and Alleva reactionary to the media I highly suspect that they do not challenge the compliance department and take everyone of their super conservative demands at face value. Their opinion/interpretation is very important but from an executive level you have to realize their perspective is very narrow. As an executive you have to bring in the full context and make decisions a little less myopically.
Posted on 3/16/19 at 3:12 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
That would only make sense if The Duke situation would have happened at LSU and involved Will Wade.
I don't see how you can disconnect Alleva's decision making skills from his Duke Lacrosse debacle?
This post was edited on 3/16/19 at 3:14 pm
Posted on 3/16/19 at 3:14 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:quote:
I'm sorry but you cannot separate the two.
What?
If this was the case, no coaches would ever be fired.
LSU and WW cannot be separated in terms of NCAA violations.
A WW violation is an LSU violation until WW is fired or quits.
Posted on 3/16/19 at 3:15 pm to Philippines4LSU
quote:
More of the same BS. I can think for myself. I'm not going to believe them now no matter how much they repeat themselves unless new information comes out that validates their position.
What in the OP was inaccurate?
Posted on 3/16/19 at 3:17 pm to KG5989
quote:
So he has the right to not talk to them and plead the 5th during the entire meeting, but he still should have met with them to plead the 5th in every question? And if that’s what Wade would have done, he wouldn’t be suspended today?
Yeah, they are contradicting themselves and are not even self-aware. If Alleva is going to rely on GG and Delly for PR it's going to be hilarious as they back themselves further and further into a corner.
Posted on 3/16/19 at 3:18 pm to GumboPot
quote:
LSU and WW cannot be separated in terms of NCAA violations.
True. However it's the duty of the officers to protect LSU, not any HC.
Posted on 3/16/19 at 3:20 pm to Macavity92
quote:
What in the OP was inaccurate?
Meeting demands in terms of timing.
Posted on 3/16/19 at 3:20 pm to Macavity92
quote:
What in the OP was inaccurate?
The OP is irrelevant. Just like him, You are missing the whole point.
The Administration should NEVER, EVER, EVER called a meeting with Wade in the first place. No meeting should ever have been asked for until AFTER the trial. Got it????
Posted on 3/16/19 at 3:21 pm to GumboPot
There really was no contradicttion. The tweet said he has the right to plead the 5th in criminal proceeding. A meeting with your bosses is not a criminal proceeding and as Lester had already posted, Will Wade is contractually obligated to meet with his bosses to discuss any possible NCAA infractions.
Popular
Back to top



0




