- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I wonder why Wade won't meet with the NCAA present?
Posted on 3/24/19 at 3:49 pm to Lester Earl
Posted on 3/24/19 at 3:49 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
It can be tied individually to coaches & staff members:
They will vacate a season where a coach was proven to have paid players. The fact that you think otherwise lets everyone know youre believing what you want.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 3:50 pm to Rickdaddy4188
These are obvious and known things. I don’t know why he’s arguing this, even for him that’s just beyond stubborn.
This post was edited on 3/24/19 at 3:51 pm
Posted on 3/24/19 at 3:54 pm to Rickdaddy4188
Show me how they nail duke without them having any ties to this
All you fricks want to sit here and say everyone is cheating but fail to acknowledge that it’s easy to skate if your coach isn’t an idiot.
They have nothing on duke in regards to this story.
All you fricks want to sit here and say everyone is cheating but fail to acknowledge that it’s easy to skate if your coach isn’t an idiot.
They have nothing on duke in regards to this story.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 3:55 pm to Madking
quote:
don’t know why he’s arguing this, even for him that’s just beyond stubborn.
He is arguing it because it lets him say," they handled this the best way they could" and act like suspending Wade would stave off the NCAA vacating th season. If he admits that the ncaa will vacate the season then he would have to admit suspending wade was irrelevant.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 3:55 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Duke has no connection with the FBI investigation
Offered 6 figures and a very nice home rent free at Kansas.
Goes to Duke for free.
You’re right nothing to see here.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 3:55 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
They will vacate a season where a coach was proven to have paid players. The fact that you think otherwise lets everyone know youre believing what you want.
It’s pointless to argue about this with someone that clearly isn’t familiar with this whole investigation.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 3:56 pm to Lester Earl
Well Marvin Bagleys family went from bankruptcy to living in a 2.4 million dollar home after he signed with Duke so if they want to get Duke they will. The problem is the NCAA has no interest in going after Duke.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 3:56 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
It’s pointless to argue about this with someone that clearly isn’t familiar with this whole investigation
This post was edited on 3/24/19 at 3:58 pm
Posted on 3/24/19 at 3:57 pm to Madking
quote:
They lied about the Friday meeting, they lied about multiple aspects of that situation. They’ve lied about Wade’s willingness to meet with them and Alleva was still holding to that lie as of Thursday. Are those two not enough? Do I need to find more because I’m sure there are more.
Show proof.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 3:57 pm to ItTakesAThief
quote:
You don’t hem yourself into a story with prior statements that can be used Against you and investigated before you testify so that a perjury trap can be set for you.
It’s that simple.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 3:57 pm to ExpoTiger
Guys...Lester is just upset CWW became beloved by LSU fans and is a great coach...as opposed to shrimp boat captain
Posted on 3/24/19 at 3:58 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
They have nothing on duke in regards to this story.
They've got nothing on Wade but a vague conversation, presumably about a player that as you've acknowledged has been cleared.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 3:58 pm to Lester Earl
Hes right. Just because you cooperate doesnt mean jack.
Ask Missouri
Ask ole piss
Ask Missouri
Ask ole piss
Posted on 3/24/19 at 3:58 pm to Goldrush25
quote:
Is there precedent for the NCAA determining a current player to be ineligible and not vacating wins in which said player took part?
I realize this is ancient basketball history, but Kentucky kept its national titles after they got the death penalty, even though players on those teams were eventually ruled ineligible.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 3:58 pm to Goldrush25
quote:
there precedent for the NCAA determining a current player to be ineligible and not vacating wins in which said player took part?
By all reports the NCAA was present during the Smart reinstatement. Could he be ruled ineligible? I guess. I’d be surprised
Posted on 3/24/19 at 3:59 pm to Lester Earl
I agree with you Lester Earl. People think because you want to be realistic that you're wrong. Let those idiots continue to believe what they want. WW is not coming back to LSU to coach. Please name one Division I program that has suspended their HC, the head coach refused to his bosses, that the coach was ever brought back. LSU is not going to sit idly for months to make a decision when WW decides it's best for him to talk. He's gone!
Posted on 3/24/19 at 3:59 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Show proof.
Show proof Wade declined the 1st meeting.
Its amazing watching you ask for proof in certain situations but then taking the lsu admin at their word at every turn.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 4:00 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Duke has no connection with the FBI investigation
Yes, they do.
50 schools involved
The report does not go into specifics regarding which programs, coaches or players could be involved, but if nearly half of the 16 teams listed by the NCAA Tournament committee are truly involved, you may be able to figure them out for yourself.
Here are the 16 teams the source refers to:
1. Virginia
2. Villanova
3. Xavier
4. Purdue
5. Auburn
6. Kansas
7. Duke
8. Cincinnati
9. Clemson
10. Texas Tech
11. Michigan State
12. North Carolina
13. Tennessee
14. Ohio State
15. Arizona
16. Oklahoma
This post was edited on 3/24/19 at 4:04 pm
Posted on 3/24/19 at 4:00 pm to Lester Earl
Lester, if we have an ineligible player the wins will be vacated nomatter what els happens period. This isn’t an arguable point my man.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 4:00 pm to Madking
quote:
They lied about the Friday meeting, they lied about multiple aspects of that situation. They’ve lied about Wade’s willingness to meet with them and Alleva was still holding to that lie as of Thursday. Are those two not enough? Do I need to find more because I’m sure there are more.
Thank you. This cannot be stated enough.
Popular
Back to top


3




