- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/30/25 at 2:28 pm to tomcatrav
False, but if Nuss gets benched and Berry gets an appropriate amount of touches… maybe?
Posted on 10/30/25 at 2:28 pm to tomcatrav
Those games are lost either way. Whit wouldn’t had made difference like how people are trying to spin it. He would of been in man coverage like all the other LBs.
This post was edited on 10/30/25 at 2:45 pm
Posted on 10/30/25 at 2:32 pm to JimTiger72
I actually agree with Jim.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 2:32 pm to tomcatrav
False. Having Weeks would make little to no difference for the defense. The scheme is a failure.
You will see this the next time LSU plays an offense in the top 50.
You will see this the next time LSU plays an offense in the top 50.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 2:45 pm to tomcatrav
Whit weeks is not making a massive difference with our struggles to stop the running qb. We have massive schematic issues stopping qb’s that can move whit weeks alone is not fixing that
This post was edited on 10/30/25 at 2:46 pm
Posted on 10/30/25 at 2:46 pm to tomcatrav
False.
It’s a scheme issue on defense not a players issue.
Pavia still does his thing and A&M still beats the snot out of LSU. So unless whit weeks completely changes the defensive scheme nothing changes.
It’s a scheme issue on defense not a players issue.
Pavia still does his thing and A&M still beats the snot out of LSU. So unless whit weeks completely changes the defensive scheme nothing changes.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 2:52 pm to LSU817
Teams are in man much of the time and running QBs indeed have an advantage there because the defense has their backs turned. Having said that, Vandy had at least 6 guys in the backfield after the play started with the OL retreating. LSU only rushed 4 which gives LSU 2 more guys defending past the LOS. Numbers count! Also, Whit Weeks as I've said more than a dozen times has great football instincts. I will hazard to guess that he would NOT have been fooled to leave the center of the field WIDE OPEN regardless of how the skilled players ran their patterns. Once again, PASS OFF a receiver to someone else. You have 2 extra guys to do that with. As far as Perkins goes, my brother and I both consider LSU's defense to be playing with 10 on defense when he is in there. Perkins has the WORST football instincts I've ever seen. Most of the plays he gets suckered so badly that they don't even need to block him
Posted on 10/30/25 at 2:52 pm to tomcatrav
Extremely false. I don't think Weeks not being in the games had anything to do with players not being able to tackle or being in the right places.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 2:54 pm to tomcatrav
Some of you are out of your mind. Whit Weeks would have made plenty of difference if 100% healthy. Enough to beat Vandy. As for A&M, I have no clue WTF happened in the second half. We were up at halftime and then it was like the whole team totally quit.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 2:57 pm to SludgeFactory
quote:
Having Weeks would make little to no difference for the defense. The scheme is a failure.
Agree with your scheme comment...disagree with your difference in the defense comment. 2 reasons: 1) Whit Weeks has BY FAR the best instincts of any LSU football player. I have said many time he reminds me of Ron Sancho who seemed to have known where the play was going at the snap. 2) WW can actually TACKLE! Pyburn and Perkins for example MISS more tackles than they execute. The two difference makers on defense IMO are clearly Delane and Whit Weeks. Haulcy is good also but Delane and Whit are in a class by themselves for LSU.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 3:02 pm to JimTiger72
quote:
We still lose to Vandy with Whit.
We probably beat Vandy.
quote:
Maybe our defense doesn’t give up 49 but we still lose to A&M
One hundred percent.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 3:05 pm to Barbellthor
A&M didn’t even try to score in the 4th. They ran HB dives every possession to milk the clock. They coulda hung 65 on us if they attempted to score.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 3:13 pm to tomcatrav
We probably win the Vandy game, so true
Posted on 10/30/25 at 3:13 pm to tomcatrav
Does Weeks play QB? so False.
Popular
Back to top


0





