- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Woodward's failed gamble
Posted on 3/13/25 at 12:53 pm to ct4lsu
Posted on 3/13/25 at 12:53 pm to ct4lsu
quote:
don't see a heisman and 2 first round WR on this team.
That’s wasn’t the argument. I said this will be his best roster, not offense, best roster.
And btw, none of us had Jayden winning the Heisman and BTJ being a first rounder pre season. We all thought Malik would be great but that’s it.
Barion, Aaron & Nic all have shots at a big season and Nuss could be really great too.
This post was edited on 3/13/25 at 1:00 pm
Posted on 3/13/25 at 12:59 pm to BilJ
quote:
oust Wade for no cost
That is called "fired with cause". Do you understand what "with cause" means? If there were no cause, there would have been no firing, but there WAS cause.
If you don't want to be fired with cause, don't do shite that will cause your employer to terminate your employment. It's really not hard to understand.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 1:48 pm to GumboPot
quote:This isn't true.
Woody did not have to sell out basketball. Football would have been the same without selling out basketball.
Pat Forde and Dick Vital scared Woody because they are puppets of the basketball blue bloods and they know WW was on the path to turning LSU in to a blue blood competitive basketball program.
Woodward kept Wade at the helm for 3 years once he was hired. Forde and Vital did not "scare Woodward" into firing Wade. Those articles started 4 years prior to the firing. He got fired once it was determined he lied to his boss, paid players directly, and the NCAA issued formal notice.
Some of you have the memory of a goldfish or are being intentionally dishonest. I lean toward no. 2.
We all loved Wade. It sucks how it ended. He is not coming back. We hired an up and coming small school coach (who had success) because we had sanctions on the horizon. It didn't work out. This isn't some grand conspiracy or overly complicated situation.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 1:50 pm to da prophet
Football brings more money than basketball ever will
Posted on 3/13/25 at 1:51 pm to SaintLSU
quote:
But Kelly is still your coach
You're one of those "not my president" mouth breathers, aren't you?
Posted on 3/13/25 at 1:53 pm to PP7 for heisman
quote:
He got fired once it was determined he lied to his boss
He was on probation when he did this
To borrow a popular term, Will Wade fired himself, Woody just informed him
Posted on 3/13/25 at 1:55 pm to Harry Boutte
quote:Lots here don't understand the consequences of actions.
That is called "fired with cause". Do you understand what "with cause" means? If there were no cause, there would have been no firing, but there WAS cause.
If you don't want to be fired with cause, don't do shite that will cause your employer to terminate your employment. It's really not hard to understand.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 1:57 pm to PP7 for heisman
quote:
This isn't true.
Woodward kept Wade at the helm for 3 years once he was hired. Forde and Vital did not "scare Woodward" into firing Wade. Those articles started 4 years prior to the firing. He got fired once it was determined he lied to his boss, paid players directly, and the NCAA issued formal notice.
Some of you have the memory of a goldfish or are being intentionally dishonest. I lean toward no. 2.
We all loved Wade. It sucks how it ended. He is not coming back. We hired an up and coming small school coach (who had success) because we had sanctions on the horizon. It didn't work out. This isn't some grand conspiracy or overly complicated situation.

Posted on 3/13/25 at 1:59 pm to That LSU Guy
quote:
Lots here don't understand the consequences of actions.
Apparently.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 2:12 pm to JiminyCricket
quote:
LSU football is going to have it's best roster yet under Kelly and is likely a preseason top 10 team
And likely a post season 15th or worse which is all that matters. Big Game Kelly needs to beat Clemson, Bama, Ole Miss, and OU away and Aggy and Florida at home.
All the NIL and preseason bullshite is great til he yet again chokes in the most important games. See Texas A&M, Florida, USC in 2024 and most of all Bama at home in 2024.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 2:12 pm to PureMetairie
quote:
Yeah you must've missed the time we won the SEC outright and were rewarded with an 8 seed.
Thank you for proving my point. SEC was A $ $ when Wade won. Kudos to him, but that in no way is predictive of how he'd fare in a newly-fierce conference lineup.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 2:16 pm to JiminyCricket
Means nothing until they produce.
We had the Heisman Trophy winner and still were average.
We had the Heisman Trophy winner and still were average.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 2:20 pm to SaveFarris
quote:
Thank you for proving my point. SEC was A $ $ when Wade won.
I think you misread what he said.
The year LSU won, the SEC had 4 teams in the sweet 16
Posted on 3/13/25 at 2:21 pm to Bottom9
quote:
And likely a post season 15th or worse which is all that matters. Big Game Kelly needs to beat Clemson, Bama, Ole Miss, and OU away and Aggy and Florida at home. All the NIL and preseason bullshite is great til he yet again chokes in the most important games. See Texas A&M, Florida, USC in 2024 and most of all Bama at home in 2024.
You’re entitled to your opinion I guess.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 2:22 pm to Kid Ray
I mean, a lot of the guys in defense have produced at a P4 level. Theres plenty of reason for optimism but I guess if you wanna take the negative route, you’re entitled to do that.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 2:23 pm to JiminyCricket
quote:
You’re entitled to your opinion I guess.
He's won like 35% of games against ranked opponents while at LSU. That isn't a sign of winning big games.
Keep digging your head in the sand.
His two predecessor's btw won like 70% of games against ranked opponents.
Woodward has you fools hook line and sinker thinking Kelly will win here
Posted on 3/13/25 at 2:28 pm to JiminyCricket
Not being negative just being a realist.
What happens if they lose at Clemson?
Will you still be gung ho about '25?
What happens if they lose at Clemson?
Will you still be gung ho about '25?
Posted on 3/13/25 at 2:30 pm to da prophet
Woodward is a fraud. Dude sucks
Posted on 3/13/25 at 2:31 pm to Bottom9
quote:
He's won like 35% of games against ranked opponents while at LSU. That isn't a sign of winning big games. Keep digging your head in the sand. His two predecessor's btw won like 70% of games against ranked opponents. Woodward has you fools hook line and sinker thinking Kelly will win here
Like I said, you’re entitled to your opinion.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 2:32 pm to Kid Ray
quote:
Not being negative just being a realist. What happens if they lose at Clemson? Will you still be gung ho about '25?
Will my expectations of the season change if they lose games once they start? Sure. All we can do is look at teams on paper right now and on paper, I like LSU.
Popular
Back to top



0





