- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 1/26/25 at 9:44 pm to lsupride87
quote:
What is the brown thing in his hands at the end of his forearms?
I don’t see a brown thing and the only bit of his arms I can see aren’t clearly past the line to gain.
Posted on 1/26/25 at 9:45 pm to lsupride87
*RB10 staring at a brown piece of leather shaped like a football that is being held by a football player in the middle of a football game*
"Well there's no way to know for sure if that's actually a football"
"Well there's no way to know for sure if that's actually a football"
Posted on 1/26/25 at 9:46 pm to lsupride87
quote:
lsupride87
I get it.
It's hard to accept when your team loses and things like this help coping with the loss.
But, this simply isn't a mistake. This is how a good game is called. It's close. But, it's not clear.
Posted on 1/26/25 at 9:48 pm to moneyg
I’m not even close to the one bitching about this or the refs the most 
I 100% put this loss on the defense. They were terrible hoenstly most of the year
The offense and the offensive TOP dominance throughout the year masked it at times
I 100% put this loss on the defense. They were terrible hoenstly most of the year
The offense and the offensive TOP dominance throughout the year masked it at times
Posted on 1/26/25 at 9:49 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
RB10 staring at a brown piece of leather shaped like a football that is being held by a football player in the middle of a football game* "Well there's no way to know for sure if that's actually a football"
What part of the football can you see that’s past the line?
Hint: None of it. The part you see isn’t clearly past the line, which is why the call STOOD and wasn’t CONFIRMED.
You guessing it’s past the line based on where his arms that aren’t past the line are because you can see them isn’t how replay in the NFL is supposed to work.
Posted on 1/26/25 at 9:49 pm to AtlantaLSUfan
Death taxes, and the refs/Goodell having Chiefs players dicks in their mouths 24/7/365.
Worthy didn't catch it.
Bills got the 1st on the 3rd down play.
A play later on the QB sneak, got it again easily but the refs bail the Chiefs out. Again. Shocking.
Worthy didn't catch it.
Bills got the 1st on the 3rd down play.
A play later on the QB sneak, got it again easily but the refs bail the Chiefs out. Again. Shocking.
Posted on 1/26/25 at 9:50 pm to RB10
quote:
I don’t see a brown thing
I circled it for you in yellow 3 times.
Posted on 1/26/25 at 9:51 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
I circled it for you in yellow 3 times.
You two keep asking if I see the football that’s past the line. That isn’t past the line, it’s still short of it.
That’s what you don’t seem to understand.
Posted on 1/26/25 at 9:53 pm to RB10
quote:
You two keep asking if I see the football that’s past the line. That isn’t past the line, it’s still short of it.
That’s what you don’t seem to understand.
Hold a ruler straight up and down up to that photo. Let me know if it crosses your ruler. In that picture the ball is past the line. Then he continues to go forward pushing the ball even further past the line. Earlier you said there was no way to know if the ball was actually behind the Chiefs player's helmet.
This post was edited on 1/26/25 at 9:56 pm
Posted on 1/26/25 at 9:56 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
You two keep asking if I see the football that’s past the line. That isn’t past the line, it’s still short of it.
That’s what you don’t seem to understand.
Hold a ruler straight up and down up to that photo. Let me know if it crosses your ruler.
in the final minutes of the game, the Bills had the ball with a chance to tie or win with a 2 point conversion. That's a fact.
Posted on 1/26/25 at 9:56 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
Hold a ruler straight up and down up to that photo. Let me know if it crosses your ruler.
It doesn’t matter because you CANNOT SEE IT.
For fricks sake man. For the last time, they can’t overturn a called spot based on where they think the football MAY be. They can only go by what they can actually see, hence the phrase “clear and indisputable evidence”. The only part of the ball you can actually see is not clearly and indisputably past the line to gain. Not overturn, no confirmation either, just “stands”.
Posted on 1/26/25 at 9:57 pm to RB10
quote:
It doesn’t matter because you CANNOT SEE IT.
Are you telling me in that picture you cannot see the football? I'm talking about the still shot of that photo.
This post was edited on 1/26/25 at 9:58 pm
Posted on 1/26/25 at 9:58 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
Earlier you said there was no way to know if the ball was actually behind the Chiefs player's helmet.
There isn’t because, again, you CANNOT SEE IT. You don’t know that it’s behind his helmet either, you just think it is. You could be correct, but there’s no way to know because it’s still including an assumption. NFL replays don’t work on any sort of assumption.
This really isn’t that complicated.
This post was edited on 1/26/25 at 9:59 pm
Posted on 1/26/25 at 10:01 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
Are you telling me in that picture you cannot see the football? I'm talking about the still shot of that photo.
You cannot see any part of the football that is clearly past the LOS, no. You also can’t even clearly see that it’s a football. You just know he’s holding a football.
If uou showed that picture to someone who didn’t watch the game they wouldn’t be able to tell you where the ball is.
This is just your inability to understand what is clear and what isn’t.
Posted on 1/26/25 at 10:01 pm to hashtag
quote:
except that's literally on the refs for fricking up twice in a row.
Refs fricked up, but it was a reviewable play on the 3rd down and Bills messed up by rushing and thinking they could get a yard real quick after not getting a yard on the same playcall for what seemed lile 100 times during the game.
Posted on 1/26/25 at 10:08 pm to RB10
quote:
There isn’t because, again, you CANNOT SEE IT. You don’t know that it’s behind his helmet either, you just think it is.
Holy frick you can't be that stupid. So if you watch a person walk behind a column you are going to sit there and say that you don't know if he is actually behind the column even though you just watched it happen?
Posted on 1/26/25 at 10:12 pm to RB10
quote:
You cannot see any part of the football that is clearly past the LOS, no. You also can’t even clearly see that it’s a football. You just know he’s holding a football.
If uou showed that picture to someone who didn’t watch the game they wouldn’t be able to tell you where the ball is.
This is just your inability to understand what is clear and what isn’t.
I can't do this anymore. So they should just get rid of replay because no matter what you think you are seeing, there is no way to actually prove what it is over video. "We can't confirm if it's a catch or not because there is no way to know if it's actually a football. It could actually be a piece of cake that looks like a football"
Posted on 1/26/25 at 10:14 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
I can't do this anymore.
You really shouldn’t. You obviously don’t understand the meaning behind clear and indisputable.
quote:
So they should just get rid of replay because no matter what you think you are seeing, there is no way to actually prove what it is over video. "We can't confirm if it's a catch or not because there is no way to know if it's actually a football. It could actually be a piece of cake that looks like a football"
If they call it an incomplete pass, and they have no angle of the ball that shows it’s clearly a catch, they wouldn’t overturn that either.
Posted on 1/26/25 at 10:16 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
Holy frick you can't be that stupid. So if you watch a person walk behind a column you are going to sit there and say that you don't know if he is actually behind the column even though you just watched it happen?
I would say I cannot see them through the column, just like I cannot see the ball through a helmet.
Page 4 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News