- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Best / Worst NFL Stadium Locations:
Posted on 1/14/26 at 10:18 pm to lsudave1
Posted on 1/14/26 at 10:18 pm to lsudave1
quote:
Because Atlanta and the Falcons fanbase are somehow even more ghetto than us and that’s saying something
People in glass trap houses shouldn't throw stones at each other, but I don't think this is really true
0
Posted on 1/14/26 at 11:23 pm to Wildcat98USA
Worst Redskins and it’s not even close
Posted on 1/14/26 at 11:39 pm to GentleJackJones
quote:
Best: Saints
quote:
Worst: Falcons
You clowns never change.
Seriously, please never change
Posted on 1/15/26 at 6:36 am to StraightCashHomey21
Many of you don’t realize that tons of local NfL fans prefer parking lot stadiums. NFL fans are mostly blue collar people that want to easily get to the stadium (usually driving), park, go to the game, and get home. Parking also allows tailgating, when nfl games are expensive some people really enjoy making it an all day affair by tailgating.
Lot of bears fans hate not being able to park and walk to the stadium easily. It also prevents people from going to games because it can make a 3 hour a game a 6-8 hour ordeal.
Great metro service is certainly preferred also, but smaller cities people don’t give a shite as most aren’t taking a metro anyway. But yeah places like NOLA and Nashville with parking but also walking distance to downtown seems like the best option.
I’m just saying the best stadium for visitors staying in a hotel downtown does not necessarily equate to a stadium good for locals.
Lot of bears fans hate not being able to park and walk to the stadium easily. It also prevents people from going to games because it can make a 3 hour a game a 6-8 hour ordeal.
Great metro service is certainly preferred also, but smaller cities people don’t give a shite as most aren’t taking a metro anyway. But yeah places like NOLA and Nashville with parking but also walking distance to downtown seems like the best option.
I’m just saying the best stadium for visitors staying in a hotel downtown does not necessarily equate to a stadium good for locals.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 7:13 am to Pettifogger
quote:
Why would the Falcons be under worst?
As a local, I like the Benz. I can just take MARTA there for $5 round trip and don’t have to fight traffic. Concessions are cheap too.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 7:27 am to CatfishJohn
quote:
Titans...With the new stadium it’s going to be even better. A bunch of bars and restaurants will be out in front of it, in addition to Broadway attractions.
The East Bank development is going to be amazing. Going from this:
to approximately this:
Posted on 1/15/26 at 8:11 am to Pettifogger
When I visit a stadium I love for it to be downtown
I would hate my home stadium to be downtown. Just a pain in the arse overall
I would hate my home stadium to be downtown. Just a pain in the arse overall
Posted on 1/15/26 at 8:20 am to Wildcat98USA
quote:
meadowlands is a desert
What's wrong with Metlife? It's a stadium with a bunch of parking for tailgating and such. What do you want it to be?
Posted on 1/15/26 at 8:24 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Idk what it’s like now, but when I lived out there the stadium was in the middle of nowhere
The area has been incredibly developed the past few years with shopping, dining, hotels (massive hotel/waterpark opening soon) and entertainment options. The NFL mandated that they offer more lodging/dining options in order to get another Super Bowl and the amount of hotels that have been built is staggering but the stadium is still off the beaten path in Glendale.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 3:44 pm to EmperorGout
quote:
SF is the worst. Not only remote but the stadium itself sucks, too.
You look at that shithole and wonder how they spent as much money on it as they did.
Nashville and Indy are great. Pittsburgh good as well. It’s fine to have a stadium near downtown but I like ones that also have lots for more traditional tailgating as well. Minnesota doesn’t have that, thus they suck.
This post was edited on 1/15/26 at 3:49 pm
Posted on 1/15/26 at 9:49 pm to GentleJackJones
I’m a Cowboys fan and could not agree more. Sterile, shitty environment with poor sight lines and idiotic design (sun), in a shite location. Everyone blames Laura Miller but Jerry is equally (it not moreso) to blame. The original and REAL Cotton Bowl has more character in a 75-year old stall shitter than Jerry World has in its entirety. And way better design and sight lines (end zone seats are actually decent due to the design).
I would rather Dallas play there with zero renovations than where they are playing now. Texas Stadium sucked but I’d take that over Jerry World.
I would rather Dallas play there with zero renovations than where they are playing now. Texas Stadium sucked but I’d take that over Jerry World.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 9:53 pm to Wildcat98USA
I’d vote in no particular order (I strongly prefer urban stadiums) - New Orleans, Seattle, Pittsburgh, SoFi (not the best location in LA but at least in the city and the design is great). Jerry World and San Fran blow.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 9:55 pm to CunningLinguist
I’m a 7th generation Dallasite so you can guess my allegiance, and our stadium is awful and an embarrassment to the franchise and the city.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News