- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Early 2012 Heisman Favorites
Posted on 12/15/11 at 6:54 pm to VerlanderBEAST
Posted on 12/15/11 at 6:54 pm to VerlanderBEAST
quote:
Not to mention you guys are about to lose a ton of starters to graduation and the NFL.
Like LSU, Bama backups are better than most teams starters.
Posted on 12/15/11 at 6:55 pm to wildtigercat93
Oregon didn't return the experience Michigan will next year and I don't think next years Alabama team is going to be anywhere near as good as this years LSU team
Posted on 12/15/11 at 9:59 pm to VerlanderBEAST
quote:
Oregon didn't return the experience Michigan will next year and I don't think next years Alabama team is going to be anywhere near as good as this years LSU team
"All the players gained expierence from the BCSNC game and that will be a great thing for the Oregon team. LSU is losing there top defensive player on each level: Patrick Peterson, Kelvin Sheppard, and Drake Nevis. The Oregon Speed will be too much for LSU to handle, and the offense will never be enough to score more than 17 on our fast defense."
I could go on, just saying dont set yourself up for a steep fall like OU fans did.
Posted on 12/15/11 at 10:02 pm to VerlanderBEAST
quote:
I am not worried about Alabama. Next year will be the most experienced Michigan team I have ever seen. We are set to have about 14 seniors starting. Not to mention you guys are about to lose a ton of starters to graduation and the NFL.
I bet you a month ban that Alabama wins.
Posted on 12/16/11 at 4:17 am to BayouBengals03
SEC! SEC! SEC!
This post was edited on 12/16/11 at 4:18 am
Posted on 12/16/11 at 4:26 am to wildtigercat93
quote:
"All the players gained expierence from the BCSNC game and that will be a great thing for the Oregon team. LSU is losing there top defensive player on each level: Patrick Peterson, Kelvin Sheppard, and Drake Nevis. The Oregon Speed will be too much for LSU to handle, and the offense will never be enough to score more than 17 on our fast defense."
I could go on, just saying dont set yourself up for a steep fall like OU fans did.
Michigan isn't Oregon and Alabama isn't LSU
This years Oregon team was a lot less experienced then Michigan will be next year. Not a chance in hell next years Alabama team will be as good as this years LSU team.
Posted on 12/16/11 at 6:52 am to VerlanderBEAST
I think Aaron Murray has a legitimate shot at getting his name into the mix if he can stay healthy. Most of the WR's Murray was throwing to this year were true Freshmen. With a full football season under their belts, and a solid spring practice, we could see some serious numbers put up. If we can knock of Bama which I am sure will be a hard thing, that could be Murray's "Heisman moment"
Posted on 12/16/11 at 7:32 am to VerlanderBEAST
quote:
Michigan isn't Oregon and Alabama isn't LSU
Correct. Oregon doesn't have 3-9 and 5-7 seasons in their recent history.
Posted on 12/16/11 at 7:44 am to VABuckeye
Mettenberger is going to take the 2012 Heisman by storm like Griffin III did this season. BOOK IT!
Posted on 12/16/11 at 7:59 am to LSUBoo
I'm surprised by how much people are just disregarding Mich in that game next year. No reason to think they won't start in the top 10 and remain right in that area the whole year.
Michigan still has talent; last 4 years rivals 2 top 10s, 20th and 21st, and top 5 for the incoming class. Should be a good game
Michigan still has talent; last 4 years rivals 2 top 10s, 20th and 21st, and top 5 for the incoming class. Should be a good game
This post was edited on 12/16/11 at 8:01 am
Posted on 12/16/11 at 8:03 am to Buckeye06
The reason why no one is counting on Michigan is because when you stop Denard Robinson, there's nothing else Michigan can do. They don't have a great defense, and they have no running game outside of D-Rob. LSU will beat Michigan and it won't even be close.
Posted on 12/16/11 at 8:04 am to USAF Hart
quote:
The reason why no one is counting on Michigan is because when you stop Denard Robinson, there's nothing else Michigan can do. They don't have a great defense, and they have no running game outside of D-Rob. LSU will beat Michigan and it won't even be close.
They do have a defense and they aren't playing LSU anytime soon.
LINK
Dunno if you've heard of this guy...but he's pretty good and they'll have another year under him
Posted on 12/16/11 at 8:19 am to Buckeye06
my bad, I meant Alabama.
Posted on 12/16/11 at 8:22 am to Buckeye06
I think Michigan's defense is pretty overhyped to be honest. Our lackluster offense put up 34 points on them (and should have had 14 more if Braxton didnt overthrow Posey all the time
). I know it's gotten better, but I still think they have plenty of holes on D.
Posted on 12/16/11 at 9:56 am to Zamoro10
quote:Don't see what all the shoutin's about...
If Barkley stays...then him.
Posted on 12/16/11 at 10:27 am to wildtigercat93
quote:
"All the players gained expierence from the BCSNC game and that will be a great thing for the Oregon team. LSU is losing there top defensive player on each level: Patrick Peterson, Kelvin Sheppard, and Drake Nevis. The Oregon Speed will be too much for LSU to handle, and the offense will never be enough to score more than 17 on our fast defense."
Of course fans said many different things about why we should beat LSU, but any rational Duck fan was concerned about losing so much from our front 7, Cliff Harris suspended leaving us with 2 freshman corners, and replacing offensive lineman with players starting their first game vs a SEC D. Nobody was claiming we were experienced outside of DT and LaMike.
Posted on 12/16/11 at 11:47 am to USAF Hart
quote:
The reason why no one is counting on Michigan is because when you stop Denard Robinson, there's nothing else Michigan can do. They don't have a great defense, and they have no running game outside of D-Rob. LSU will beat Michigan and it won't even be close.
Actually our RB Fitzgerald Toussaint has stepped up in a big way
Posted on 12/16/11 at 11:49 am to VerlanderBEAST
It's going to be an interesting game, but I think Depth will catch up to Michigan in the end, letting Alabama pull away.
Posted on 12/16/11 at 2:13 pm to USAF Hart
quote:
It's going to be an interesting game, but I think Depth will catch up to Michigan in the end, letting Alabama pull away.
We return like 80% of our 2 deep on defense. Depth isn't an issue
Posted on 12/16/11 at 2:16 pm to Buckeye06
quote:
Michigan still has talent; last 4 years rivals 2 top 10s, 20th and 21st, and top 5 for the incoming class.
Hasn't Bama finished 1st, 3rd, 1st, and possibly 1st again over that same time period.
As far as the game, I'd pick Bama. I'm honestly not sure who all will return, but I can't see Denard having a great time with that defense. Michigan will need a very good game defensively to have a shot.
This post was edited on 12/16/11 at 2:18 pm
Popular
Back to top


0






