- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Holy shite, Cooks had caught it and knee went down
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:21 pm to saintsfan1977
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:21 pm to saintsfan1977
he was on his back, ball was out
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:26 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
If there had been no defender and the ball had popped out on the ground, there's no chance they would have given him the catch
Of course not, because he wouldn't have completed the process.
quote:
There simply was no way for him to have completed it prior to the ball coming out.
There's simply no way to say that with any certainty when there actually was a defender, and he ripped it out after Cooks was already on the ground.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:34 pm to infantry1026
Now these refs are doing dumb shite for the SF-SEA game
I can’t believe they gave SEA that time out as the ball was being snapped. SF had made that 1st down. Shannahan is losing his fricking mind on the sidelines lol
I can’t believe they gave SEA that time out as the ball was being snapped. SF had made that 1st down. Shannahan is losing his fricking mind on the sidelines lol
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:37 pm to infantry1026
Irrelevant, the refs ignored an obvious hold by Buffalo in the endzone earlier in that drive that would have ended the game. The announcers even commented on it.
Was it rigged or just the same old bad reffing? Can't say Buffalo was screwed by refs after Denver was already screwed out of the win by the same refs.
Was it rigged or just the same old bad reffing? Can't say Buffalo was screwed by refs after Denver was already screwed out of the win by the same refs.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:45 pm to nvasil1
quote:I think it's very easy to say he hadn't yet survived the ground just because he touched it for a split second.
There's simply no way to say that with any certainty when there actually was a defender, and he ripped it out after Cooks was already on the ground.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:51 pm to Big Scrub TX
I remember a play like this when LSU played at Texas in 2019 - ended up just calling it incomplete, which is what I think should have happened here. Split the difference if it’s not definitive.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:55 pm to infantry1026
quote:
Play should have been over
Looks like Broncos won 33-30. Time to go home bro.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:58 pm to RB10
Just let it be 2 steps frick everything else.
This post was edited on 1/17/26 at 7:59 pm
Posted on 1/17/26 at 8:00 pm to infantry1026
I’m ok with how it was called, the ball was in both possessions as they went to the ground and defender had control immediately after hitting ground.
Of course Josh Allen leg humpers will say orherwise.
Of course Josh Allen leg humpers will say orherwise.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 8:02 pm to GatorPA84
Tie goes to WR and the WR was down before the ball even began to move towards the defender. The NFL consistently cannot define what is and isnt a catch and didnt even bother to review this season defining play. The refs consistently suck for some reason and always seem to insert themselves at the worst time.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 8:03 pm to infantry1026
quote:
Holy shite, Cooks had caught it and knee went downby
Play should have been over
You have to survive the ground. If the ball had bounced up and then landed in the ground nobody would be saying it was complete.
He lost it when he hit the ground. It just happened to be in the hands if the defender when that happened.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 8:04 pm to GWfool
quote:
hat either has to be a catch and down by contact or just an incomplete. How can it be an interception when he is laying on the ground with the ball and the defensive back takes it away after he would be down on any other play? Makes no sense
How could it be incomplete if the ball never touches the ground?
One thing is for sure, it’s either complete or an interception.
If everything happens exactly the same but the DB doesn’t possess the ball it’s ruled incomplete 99% of the time. Therefore it’s a pick, imo. Should it be is a completely different argument.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 8:05 pm to canyon
Posted on 1/17/26 at 8:06 pm to moneyg
The ground didnt "cause" anything though, he was down and being touched by a defender which should mean dead play. Theres a picture somewhere where he has his left knee down and clearly has the ball in his chest. Should be dead play right there. ^^its actually right above this now
This post was edited on 1/17/26 at 8:07 pm
Posted on 1/17/26 at 8:11 pm to The Tiger322
quote:
The ground didnt "cause" anything though, he was down and being touched by a defender which should mean dead play.
Cause isn’t relevant. You have to complete the catch and completing the catch means you control the ball through the ground and maintain that control.
That didn’t happen. Him hitting the ground and losing it tot he defender was all a simultaneous act.
I hate Denver. But that was not a catch.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 8:11 pm to infantry1026
Are you guys just Payton haters? Broncos DB had his arm under the ball the entire time.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 8:12 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:The defensive lineman is clearly not in the endzone in your picture
game over right there
Posted on 1/17/26 at 8:20 pm to infantry1026
Yep, maybe, it could've gone either way
I'm glad it went the Broncos way.
Team Payton
I'm glad it went the Broncos way.
Team Payton
Posted on 1/17/26 at 8:26 pm to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:
I remember a play like this when LSU played at Texas in 2019 - ended up just calling it incomplete, which is what I think should have happened here. Split the difference if it’s not definitive.
How can it be incomplete when the ball never touched the ground and both players were in bounds?
Popular
Back to top



2







