Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us What is the board's opinion on lacrosse? | Page 3 | More Sports
Started By
Message

re: What is the board's opinion on lacrosse?

Posted on 4/22/15 at 12:33 pm to
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
43536 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

It's for kids that couldn't hack it in baseball or got burnt out on baseball. Partly kidding...partly




In areas that are just now getting the sport I'd agree with that assessment. But areas that have had it for 20+ years I'd say that's wrong.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 12:47 pm to
I've nver understood baseball players' hatred of lacrosse. This is a real thing. The baseball team at my high school HATED the lax team. Just hated them.

I felt it was a weird sport for the baseball guys to hate. It's not like they had anything in common, really.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
80331 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 12:49 pm to
It probably stems from the baseball coaches' hatred for lacrosse.

It takes away from their talent pool. Same with track, and boys volleyball.
Posted by FootballNostradamus
Member since Nov 2009
20509 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

Seems like it would be fun to play but it's un-watchable to me.




This is it's biggest hurdle. It's not as condensed and fast as hockey, nor does it have the loyal following hockey does.

It is an absolute blast to play, though. Lots of us football players played it in the offseason, was fun and got you in great shape.
Posted by Larry Gooseman
Houston
Member since Mar 2014
2767 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

It's for kids that couldn't hack it in baseball or got burnt out on baseball. Partly kidding...partly



Or maybe they wanted something a little more physical?

Lacrosse players, midfielders specifically, are 10x more athletic than baseball players.

Great sport because size is secondary to quickness, technique, and skill.
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
27359 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 2:57 pm to
Lacrosse players are not 10x more athletic than baseball players. Haha. How do you even conclude this?

Lacrosse is very difficult to watch. It will be just like soccer. Soccer is only watchable for big games like the World Cup, and even that is difficult to watch when there are no marquee names

Posted by Kamtheman106
In that number.
Member since Mar 2012
404 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 2:59 pm to
It's a dumb sport that Northern kids taking super seriously to make themselves feel like real athletes.


It's essentially a bunch of guys running around with sticks, hitting each other. Dumb sport is dumb.
Posted by BRgetthenet
Member since Oct 2011
118241 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 3:00 pm to
Agreed. Hard to tell who has the ball.

I don't care enough to really figure out who has it. I like the look on the goalie's face when he gets burned.
Posted by Veritas
Member since Feb 2005
10530 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

It's a dumb sport that Northern kids taking super seriously to make themselves feel like real athletes.


It's generally a rich kids sport, hence the Northern.

And the sport that lacrosse resembles the most is Basketball, with elements of Hockey (physicality, penalties).
This post was edited on 4/22/15 at 3:08 pm
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37371 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 3:02 pm to
awesome sport

harder to televise than football but entertaining in person
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37371 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 3:08 pm to
quote:


It's essentially a bunch of guys running around with sticks, hitting each other. Dumb sport is dumb.


Posted by BoatSchoolTiger
Houston, TX
Member since May 2013
659 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

the sport that lacrosse resembles the most is Basketball, with elements of Hockey (physicality, penalties).


I have always said it like hockey above the waist on grass.

Posted by BoatSchoolTiger
Houston, TX
Member since May 2013
659 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

harder to televise than football


This is why football will remain king in U.S. built in breaks for ads.
Posted by Larry Gooseman
Houston
Member since Mar 2014
2767 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

Lacrosse players are not 10x more athletic than baseball players. Haha. How do you even conclude this?


Easy, I've been to both sports in person. Baseball is sedentary by comparison.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61441 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

Lacrosse players are not 10x more athletic than baseball players. Haha. How do you even conclude this?

Lacrosse is very difficult to watch. It will be just like soccer. Soccer is only watchable for big games like the World Cup, and even that is difficult to watch when there are no marquee names




Love the site man but you need to get out more.
Posted by Keys Open Doors
In hiding with Tupac & XXXTentacion
Member since Dec 2008
32838 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 5:16 pm to
The baseball/lacrosse fight is hilarious for me. The lacrosse companies are still small enough to have edgy ads. I mean can you imagine a Nike ad with Kevin Durant or LeBron in drinking champagne with models in a hot tub or wearing a pimp outfit coming out of a private jet? That was essentially the crux of the Maverick ads with Danowski and Rabil a few years ago.

Anyways, all of the lacrosse companies make sure their guys trash the hell out of baseball in interviews. I think they view baseball as by far the most susceptible sport for their target demo (5-15 year olds from Charlotte to Boston, and then out to Ohio, plus Denver).

Basically all of the guys who play lacrosse at the big schools were first team All-State or at least All-County guys in football, if they play the stronger positions, like SSDM, LSM, or Defense. I've noticed a lot of the smaller, skilled guys have soccer backgrounds, as well as hockey.

I know Duke had a defender who graduated last year who started 4 years, who turned down an SMU football offer, but I don't think that's really common yet. People like Myles Jones still really stick out in college lacrosse, and not because of his race.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61441 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 5:19 pm to
quote:


I know Duke had a defender who graduated last year who started 4 years, who turned down an SMU football offer, but I don't think that's really common yet


I'd turn down June Jones too.

He was such a lazy arse that some kids found out they had SMU offers via twitter b/c the fat frick didn't take the time to call them.
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
71727 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 6:25 pm to
Boring as hell on TV to me but I also thought that of soccer which is now my favorite sport to follow. I try to keep an I open mind. Seems like it would be fun to play.
Posted by auzach91
Marietta, GA
Member since Jan 2009
41309 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 6:27 pm to
At my school it was all the stoners and rejects who couldn't cut it playing football or baseball
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
27359 posts
Posted on 4/22/15 at 6:46 pm to
Sorry, but once you get to high school, you cannot be unathletic and play baseball.

Just look at LSU's baseball team as an example... every outfielder and every middle infielder will be as athletic (if not more) then the most athletic lacrosse player.

Perhaps you meant lacrosse players are 10 times more conditioned, which I won't argue.

Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram