Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us First look at 'The Beatles' Biopic Films (updated) | Page 2 | Movie/TV Board
Started By
Message

re: First look at 'The Beatles' Biopic Films (updated)

Posted on 1/29/26 at 12:53 pm to
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
59552 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 12:53 pm to
Maybe just tired of white women? I know tons of white dudes married to Asians.
Posted by skullhawk
My house
Member since Nov 2007
27346 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 12:59 pm to
quote:


Who’s playing Clapton?

Or is that part not in this movie


It's possible. Isn't this project supposed to produce four films? I know that was the original plan.

This should be really good. Count me in.

Hopefully, they don't spend too much time with the India crap.
This post was edited on 1/29/26 at 1:01 pm
Posted by DoomGuy504
Member since May 2024
413 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

hy JL fawn over he so much?


Great musician but he kinda sucks so it makes sense he finally found someone like that.
Posted by BRich
Old Metairie
Member since Aug 2017
2897 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

Maybe just tired of white women? I know tons of white dudes married to Asians.


Apparently he was, because when John and Yoko separated for a while, he was doing May Pang:



The whole thing, which lasted about a year and a half, was actually put together by Yoko Ono herself (I guess she was a female cuck).
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
155943 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

The whole thing, which lasted about a year and a half, was actually put together by Yoko Ono herself (I guess she was a female cuck).

And more than that, during that timeframe apparently it was the happiest and most content John was in a really long time. People said he was sort of back to being himself and saw more of his friends and family than he ever did with Yoko. I believe even one of his sons said he was much better during that time (I assume it had to be Julian who said that).

The story is that John and Yoko loved each other so much that they just wanted to be around each other ALL the time. Which seems nice on the surface, but the deeper you get into that the more disturbing it is when you realize that they never left each other's sides, even when it was causing friction with other things (businesses, the band, personal life, etc.).

Revisionist history has been kinder to Yoko, and Paul and Ringo have eased up on their stances a bit I believe. But IMO she was definitely a huge catalyst in the band breaking up. But I also think John was looking for a way out anyway, and she was the catalyst he needed to achieve that so he rolled with it. Peter Jackson's Get Back doc at least showed that there wasn't just constant hate thrown at her during that time. But it was definitely odd that she was literally always sitting next to John like a little puppy or something.

Just weird for someone to have that much control over someone so famous. And she basically turned him into a househusband for like five years.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
129062 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 2:05 pm to
quote:


Revisionist history has been kinder to Yoko, and Paul and Ringo have eased up on their stances a bit I believe. But IMO she was definitely a huge catalyst in the band breaking up. But I also think John was looking for a way out anyway, and she was the catalyst he needed to achieve that so he rolled with it. Peter Jackson's Get Back doc at least showed that there wasn't just constant hate thrown at her during that time. But it was definitely odd that she was literally always sitting next to John like a little puppy or something.


Didn't George want out even more than John? He was very sick of being 3rd fiddle
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
47698 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

People said he was sort of back to being himself and saw more of his friends and family than he ever did with Yoko. I believe even one of his sons said he was much better during that time (I assume it had to be Julian who said that).
yes it was may pang who put john and julian back together, after john had not seen julian in several years. this is also the time when john and paul started talking again, and even jammed together in los angeles ("a toot and a snore in '74")
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
155943 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

Didn't George want out even more than John? He was very sick of being 3rd fiddle

Well he quit the band during those same sessions.

But yeah he was way too into the India shite and I've seen him say the Beatles felt too much like a job and he would rather be jamming with people like Dylan, Clapton, etc.

George and John had already done some solo stuff, and Paul's debut (I think) album was coming out around the same time as Let It Be. Honestly Ringo was likely the only one who wanted to stay together in the end.
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
38196 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

Who’s playing Clapton?
Clapton plays guitar.
Pattie plays Clapton.
Posted by gumbo2176
Member since May 2018
19869 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

What was Yokos redeeming qualities? Why JL fawn over he so much?



She probably could suck a bowling ball through a garden hose. Other than that, she's not the least bit attractive and sings?? like a cat trapped in a rocker factory.
Posted by PJinAtl
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2007
14273 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

Concept: Four separate films, one for each Beatle, released together as a "cinematic event".


Interesting concept. I wonder if each film will have some common scenes/sequences but show you the same event from the various people's perspective.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39327 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

And more than that, during that timeframe apparently it was the happiest and most content John was in a really long time
Eh. He also nearly drank himself to death during the same "Lost Weekend".

quote:

But IMO she was definitely a huge catalyst in the band breaking up
I don't think so. They were careening towards a crack up, no matter what. I mean, she didn't help and I hate her, but it's simplistic to put it on her.

quote:


Just weird for someone to have that much control over someone so famous. And she basically turned him into a househusband for like five years.


He was a deeply injured and damaged child in a man's body. I credit him for having had the courage to chase down some of those demons.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39327 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

Interesting concept. I wonder if each film will have some common scenes/sequences but show you the same event from the various people's perspective.
Anything is on the table. I'm not sure Raimi is the guy, but let's hope it's a completely fulsome effort. It has the chance to be great.
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
38713 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

Anna Sawai as Yoko Ono

GTFO.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
59552 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 4:14 pm to
quote:

I'm not sure Raimi is the guy, but let's hope it's a completely fulsome effort. I


It's Sam Mendes
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39327 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

It's Sam Mendes
Uh oh. I hated American Beauty.
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
155943 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

I don't think so. They were careening towards a crack up, no matter what. I mean, she didn't help and I hate her, but it's simplistic to put it on her.

I didn’t simply put it on her. I said she was a large catalyst for it. Which is true based on what the other three have said. All three were pretty jarred when John started bringing her into the studio and into their space that they had never shared with anybody else (especially significant others-wise).

But like I said, they were also growing apart by the end as well, and most were doing their own projects and side/solo stuff. And Paul and Ringo now have cooled on the Yoko stuff and chalked it up to John and her being in love and wanting to spend time together.
This post was edited on 1/29/26 at 5:14 pm
Posted by rebelrouser
Columbia, SC
Member since Feb 2013
13069 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 5:24 pm to
I think the Yoko blame is way over blown. They were all ready for something new. Dropping George Martin was part of that. George Martin was really the underappreciated one. He wrote, arranged, orchestrated many parts of their great songs.
Posted by UnluckyTiger
Member since Sep 2003
42481 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 5:42 pm to
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39327 posts
Posted on 1/29/26 at 6:07 pm to
quote:


I didn’t simply put it on her. I said she was a large catalyst for it. Which is true based on what the other three have said.
I'm not sure that's right. Ringo left the band briefly in August 1968 and cited him feeling the odd man out of the 4 as the reason.

I tend to look at the cause and effect the other way: if they hadn't been already careening toward a terminal condition, John would never have invited Yoko to the studio in the first place. The Beatles had been his 24/7 life for a decade. No way he would have let some broad interfere with their goals and doings. But once he was past that, that was it for the band. (Not to mention the fact that John explicitly said when Epstein died that they were finished - and that was a full year before even the Ringo incident).
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram